Rigondeaux > Lomachenko

[DuckAdonis]

Loma schooled him and made him quit, gtfoh with this bs. Rigondeaux couldn't even land a solid punch on him

[DuckAdonis]

You can't just "take off" the Donaire win. It happened and it's not like Rigondeaux's other wins are bad (and nor is it like Lomachenko's resume is that special).

Loma schooled Walters and made him quit like a ***** (did the same to your boy Rigo). Walters KO'd Donaire

Next

[Jsmooth9876]

Another imbecile makes their way to NSB. Welcome, the slow table is over there to the left......

[ShawnTaylor]

Loma schooled him and made him quit, gtfoh with this bs. Rigondeaux couldn't even land a solid punch on him

Imagine if it had been a prime Rigondeaux, at a fair weight. If you're even capable of thinking that far.

I don't get why you people ignore the Salido loss so much... Rigondeaux would never lose to such a fighter.

[Vlad_]

Nope. Loma schooled Rigo without using his size advantage. It was all skill and Rigo just quit like a bitch.

Next question.

[QueensburyRules]

First of all, yeah, I gotta give it to Lomachenko, he's a good boxer. No doubt about that. But I honestly think Rigondeaux should be considered the superior fighter.

Lomachenko defeated him, but that was due to a massive size advantage. Lomachenko himself admitted that after their fight. Basically, that fight means nothing in a P4P context. And if we do compare them in a P4P context, I think Rigondeaux is easily superior. The reasons are many.

1: Rigondeaux schooled Donaire in his prime, which was a far superior win to anything Lomachenko has accomplished as a professional.
2: Lomachenko lost to Salido. He did redeem himself after that, but come on, the very thought of Rigondeaux losing to such a low-level fighter is unthinkable. Rigondeaux is more consistent than Lomachenko.
3: Rigondeaux and Lomachenko are both technicians, but Lomachenko is kinda featherfisted, while Rigondeaux also happens to be one of the most hard-hitting fighters in his division. Much more dangerous.
4: Lomachenko's got old faster. Rigondeaux has been old and past it for years, while Lomachenko is a young man who already is stepping out of his prime at significant speed. He looked horrible against Campbell and Pedraza, who both took him through 12 rounds.

Again, I respect Lomachenko, but I don't respect the fact that so many consider him a superior fighter to Rigondeaux. When you take all the facts into consideration, Rigondeaux simply appears to, P4P, be the superior fighter, who has been unfairly pushed aside due to stepping up and losing against a far bigger and far younger opponent.

- -You young, dum, and full of dummy?

Donaire knocked down Rigomortis 2x to lose a political decision.

Rigomortis offered Loma at 126, but turned it down like he does most every hard fight. He was finally forced to take a Loma fight to recoup the losses his minders have incurred feathering his nest for you light in the loafers.

And he QUIT...LITL!!!

[Rusty Tromboni]

First of all, yeah, I gotta give it to Lomachenko, he's a good boxer. No doubt about that. But I honestly think Rigondeaux should be considered the superior fighter.

Lomachenko defeated him, but that was due to a massive size advantage. Lomachenko himself admitted that after their fight. Basically, that fight means nothing in a P4P context. And if we do compare them in a P4P context, I think Rigondeaux is easily superior. The reasons are many.

1: Rigondeaux schooled Donaire in his prime, which was a far superior win to anything Lomachenko has accomplished as a professional.
2: Lomachenko lost to Salido. He did redeem himself after that, but come on, the very thought of Rigondeaux losing to such a low-level fighter is unthinkable. Rigondeaux is more consistent than Lomachenko.
3: Rigondeaux and Lomachenko are both technicians, but Lomachenko is kinda featherfisted, while Rigondeaux also happens to be one of the most hard-hitting fighters in his division. Much more dangerous.
4: Lomachenko's got old faster. Rigondeaux has been old and past it for years, while Lomachenko is a young man who already is stepping out of his prime at significant speed. He looked horrible against Campbell and Pedraza, who both took him through 12 rounds.

Again, I respect Lomachenko, but I don't respect the fact that so many consider him a superior fighter to Rigondeaux. When you take all the facts into consideration, Rigondeaux simply appears to, P4P, be the superior fighter, who has been unfairly pushed aside due to stepping up and losing against a far bigger and far younger opponent.

Dude, there's this new beverage going around you HAVE to try it!!!!

Equal parts amonia and bleach. 100% delicious!

Go for it, baby!

[R-Hand Southpaw]

Imagine if it had been a prime Rigondeaux, at a fair weight. If you're even capable of thinking that far.

I don't get why you people ignore the Salido loss so much... Rigondeaux would never lose to such a fighter.

It's nice how my first post completely trashed your entire arguement you decided to not respond so OP let me trash your opinion again.

Rigo is a career 122lber and Lomachenkos career low division is 126lbs.

The fight was offered at a fair weight of 126lbs. Rigo said no. Rigo is only 2 inches shorter than Lomachenko and has a longer reach. They are similar in size.

Compare that to the differences lomachenko faces at 135 where the fighters are 3-4 inches taller and have that same 3-4 inch advantage.

And dude. You obviously dont know s.hit about boxing and obviously didnt watch Lomachenko vs Salido. The fight was competitive but Lomachenko was pulling away late in the fight. The decision was a split decision and you wanna complain about weight? Salido came in over weight too! Wanna complain? How about all the low blows the ref missed? But it doesnt suit your agenda right?

Its funny how you forget stuff when its convenient eh? You also fail to mention Rigo wanted the fight at 130, not Lomachenko. Did you hear Lomachenko begging to fight Rigo? No. You didnt. Rigo and fans begged Lomachenko for this fight and he delivered. People like you claiming Rigos left was so strong it would break Lomachenkos jaw.

Lmfao. Rigo was so pathetic that its not an opinion. Its FACT. Any weight and any age would have not changed the outcome. Styles makes fights and Lomachenko was never gonna lose to Rigo.

Maybe you didnt get that when Lomachenko semi retired him and took his soul. Rigo was on twitter everyday until that fight and then was not heard from again lmfao

[Chrismart]

I'm a fan of both, but Loma is on another level.

[Curtis Harper]

as usual.. you spot on.. respect

Why do so called fight fans bring unwanted attention to themselves