Rigondeaux > Lomachenko

[Ca$ual Fan]

Are you really sure you wanna compare their resumes?

I think we should. List down Rigo’s top 5 wins. Start with Donaire. And???

[ShawnTaylor]

I think we should. List down Rigo’s top 5 wins. Start with Donaire. And???

Lomachenko's top 5 wins:
1 - Orlando Salido (Just kidding, Lomachenko got spanked in this one)
1 - Nicholas Walters (whose only achievement was to fight Jason Sosa to a draw and beat a shot Donaire who had just moved up in weight)
2 - Gary Russel (31 fights and only 1 against a good opponent, Lomachenko, which he lost)
3 - Jason Sosa (who couldn't even beat a shot Gamboa)
4 - Jose Pedraza (Lomachenko struggled against Gervonta Davis' leftovers, unlike Davis, who made easy work of him)
5 - I honestly don't know, none of them are very good.

Rigondeaux's top 5 wins:
1 - Donaire (who was within basically every P4P list's top 5 at the time, this win alone destroys Lomachenko's resume in its entirety)
2 - Rico Ramos (the undefeated WBA super bantamweight champion)
3 - Moises Flores (yet another undefeated champion, who got knocked out in the first round)
4 - Ricardo Cordoba (a solid opponent, no doubt)
5 - Hisashi Amagasa (I know, Amagasa is nothing special, but his size advantage was absolutely enormous, making it an impressive win)

As my daddy used to say... "Be careful what you wish for".

[Ca$ual Fan]

Lmao, look at this one. I only asked for names but you have to carry an explanation to make the list look good for the ones you favor

Lomachenko's top 5 wins:
1 - Orlando Salido (Just kidding, Lomachenko got spanked in this one)
1 - Nicholas Walters (whose only achievement was to fight Jason Sosa to a draw and beat a shot Donaire who had just moved up in weight)
2 - Gary Russel (31 fights and only 1 against a good opponent, Lomachenko, which he lost)
3 - Jason Sosa (who couldn't even beat a shot Gamboa)
4 - Jose Pedraza (Lomachenko struggled against Gervonta Davis' leftovers, unlike Davis, who made easy work of him)
5 - I honestly don't know, none of them are very good.

I didn’t ask you to make a list for Loma. I know you’ll be biased and you’ll make it as bad as you can. Salidoeee

2 - Rico Ramos (the undefeated WBA super bantamweight champion)

3 - Moises Flores (yet another undefeated champion, who got knocked out in the first round)

4 - Ricardo Cordoba (a solid opponent, no doubt)
5 - Hisashi Amagasa (I know, Amagasa is nothing special, but his size advantage was absolutely enormous, making it an impressive win)

I mean seriously man, who the hell are these? Rico Ramos is a descent champ but he’s nothing special. Moises Flores? Descent contender but he’s not a top fighter. Does ‘no contest’ event count as a resume? Hamagasa is even a nobody. That fight with Rigo just made him somebody. I wonder if you call him a weight bully too had he won against Rigo. Cordoba? Seriously, these guys you mentioned aren’t even real champions except Rico Ramos and you have him next to Donaire? How far levels apart do you think are they? The list is poor man no wonder they need explanations

I’ll write down my list for Loma out of respect but I don’t need to put up an explanation for these

1. Russel
2. Rigo - sorry no hard feelings
3. Walters
4. Linares
5. Pedraza - Tank’s best win btw

There you go. Real champs in the list not just contenders. Donaire is the best win obviously but all the rest can’t be compared to Loma’s list of wins.

As my daddy used to say... "Be careful what you wish for".

You started this thread. You just got your wishes and took some attention here

[A.K]

Pretty funny to see this from a guy whose profile picture is of Golovkin punching Canelo, while we all know how that fight turned out. Don't throw around the word "******", it will often result in yourself looking ******.

Don’t deflect Loma schools and embarrass and pretty much exposes rigo who wanted the fight himself and you were here on a different account (using a alt now cause you know you’re a moron) talking all that rara of how rigo would do that to loma but instead rigo got boy’d and you still think he is better huh??? something is wrong with you it doesn’t work that way you’re a special type of ******.

[Nige]

Rigo stepped up in weight and fought bigger man - lost

Loma stepped up more than once against bigger men - won in fashion

Case closed.

[ShawnTaylor]

Rigo stepped up in weight and fought bigger man - lost

Loma stepped up more than once against bigger men - won in fashion

Case closed.

Tell me when Lomachenko ever stepped up two divisions at once to face one of the P4P top fighters in the world? You can't compare these two cases.

[ShawnTaylor]

Loma schools and embarrass and pretty much exposes rigo who wanted the fight himself

Wow, such a hater. How can you go up two divisions, in old age, against one of the P4P best fighters, and get "exposed" when you've already proven your greatness over and over again? Boxing fans are ungrateful as ****.

[Curtis Harper]

Losing by KO/TKO/UD/MD > Quitting/Retiring From The Sport

If a guy thinks he's too small to fight someone, don't fight that giant.
If you fight that giant and lose, don't cry about it.

[Curtis Harper]

Walters > Loma

[Zaroku]

First of all, yeah, I gotta give it to Lomachenko, he's a good boxer. No doubt about that. But I honestly think Rigondeaux should be considered the superior fighter.

Lomachenko defeated him, but that was due to a massive size advantage. Lomachenko himself admitted that after their fight. Basically, that fight means nothing in a P4P context. And if we do compare them in a P4P context, I think Rigondeaux is easily superior. The reasons are many.

1: Rigondeaux schooled Donaire in his prime, which was a far superior win to anything Lomachenko has accomplished as a professional.
2: Lomachenko lost to Salido. He did redeem himself after that, but come on, the very thought of Rigondeaux losing to such a low-level fighter is unthinkable. Rigondeaux is more consistent than Lomachenko.
3: Rigondeaux and Lomachenko are both technicians, but Lomachenko is kinda featherfisted, while Rigondeaux also happens to be one of the most hard-hitting fighters in his division. Much more dangerous.
4: Lomachenko's got old faster. Rigondeaux has been old and past it for years, while Lomachenko is a young man who already is stepping out of his prime at significant speed. He looked horrible against Campbell and Pedraza, who both took him through 12 rounds.

Again, I respect Lomachenko, but I don't respect the fact that so many consider him a superior fighter to Rigondeaux. When you take all the facts into consideration, Rigondeaux simply appears to, P4P, be the superior fighter, who has been unfairly pushed aside due to stepping up and losing against a far bigger and far younger opponent.

i think me vs you.. street fight... will end your posting and your ******idty

come on.. set a date.. a place in the bay.. i will be there..

lets have billablue2 ref it.. lets have my lil homie video tape everything.. iphone. etc..

maricon.. let's fight... now.. stop posting unless you willing to throw chingasos..

i am waiting for your invite to fight.. all in boy..