GGG's 164 physique vs 160 - ask yourself, which looks more ideal!
Collapse
-
-
I have no idea how many times your garbage a.ss has been proved wrong in your own thread and you still cant let it go
You say Canelo is the smaller man but he isnt. He is only the shorter man. Canelo is not only thicker but wider than GGG. He is stocky for his height unlike GGG.
I'm the very same build as Canelo and I'm wider because I have a 72 inch reach. Take it from someone who knows unlike you who doesnt. You dont have the damndest clue about human anatomy.
The reason Canelo can cut more weight is because of that fact. Muscle retains water and bone doesnt. GGG is taller and has more skeletal mass.
Look at shawn porter. The dude is massive for 147 and fought in the amateurs at 168. Amateurs is same day weight in. Dude cuts from 168+ down to 147 despite his short height because hes thick.
Canelo does the exact same ****. You all complain that GGG is a weight bully when he isnt. He is fighting at the weight he can make which is 160.
But nah.
Canelo can camp at 155 for years despite being a legit MW by draining people above him and dragging up smaller fighters to fight him.
But nah. He gets a pass from you.
He can ask for all the catchweights he wants but gets a pass from you.
Too funny.
Even Kovalev isnt as dumb as you. He knows Canelo should feel comfortable at 175 because he weights 180+ walking around. He wont need to cut for this fight.Comment
-
I have no idea how many times your garbage a.ss has been proved wrong in your own thread and you still cant let it go
You say Canelo is the smaller man but he isnt. He is only the shorter man. Canelo is not only thicker but wider than GGG. He is stocky for his height unlike GGG.
I'm the very same build as Canelo and I'm wider because I have a 72 inch reach. Take it from someone who knows unlike you who doesnt. You dont have the damndest clue about human anatomy.
The reason Canelo can cut more weight is because of that fact. Muscle retains water and bone doesnt. GGG is taller and has more skeletal mass.
Look at shawn porter. The dude is massive for 147 and fought in the amateurs at 168. Amateurs is same day weight in. Dude cuts from 168+ down to 147 despite his short height because hes thick.
Canelo does the exact same ****. You all complain that GGG is a weight bully when he isnt. He is fighting at the weight he can make which is 160.
But nah.
Canelo can camp at 155 for years despite being a legit MW by draining people above him and dragging up smaller fighters to fight him.
But nah. He gets a pass from you.
He can ask for all the catchweights he wants but gets a pass from you.
Too funny.
Even Kovalev isnt as dumb as you. He knows Canelo should feel comfortable at 175 because he weights 180+ walking around. He wont need to cut for this fight.
FACT: 160 > 155
FUN FACT: 175 > 155 and 160
Comment
-
No matter how many times you idiots will push the 'he's a huge MW omg weight bully' narrative, and no matter how many cherrypicked photos you post, wont make that true.
He looked exactly the same in the ring vs. Rolls as he did against 2nd Canelo fight. He'll look the same tonight.Comment
-
Rolls fought numerous fights at Middleweight since 2015. So unless he was overweight for all those fights he was 160 or under. He's also fought as a SM during that time. Do you have links to those fights showing he's at a catchweight? As far as the Rolls fight goes I've stated to you numerous times that the fight was a mismatch. Yes I don't like catchweight fights as I've said for titles or rankings. I didn't like that particular fight either. You already know all this.Comment
-
Rolls fought numerous fights at Middleweight since 2015. So unless he was overweight for all those fights he was 160 or under. He's also fought as a SM during that time. Do you have links to those fights showing he's at a catchweight? As far as the Rolls fight goes I've stated to you numerous times that the fight was a mismatch. Yes I don't like catchweight fights as I've said for titles or rankings. I didn't like that particular fight either. You already know all this.
Rolls had not made 160 since 2015... you excuse-making muppet
1) cries incessantly about Canelo... despite the fact that Canelo did not drain his JMW opponents at 155...
2) ...
* ignores Golovkin demanding 164 from Ward
* ignores Golovkin demanding 164 from Rolls
* ignores Golovkin offering to defend against Rosado at 158
3) calls me a hypocrite
#excusemakingmuppetComment
-
I've never called you a hypocrite that I can recall. I've called you a lot worse than that. Since you brought it up yeah you're a hypocrite. Still waiting for those links to prove Rolls hasn't fought as a middleweight.Rolls had not made 160 since 2015... you excuse-making muppet
1) cries incessantly about Canelo... despite the fact that Canelo did not drain his JMW opponents at 155...
2) ...
* ignores Golovkin demanding 164 from Ward
* ignores Golovkin demanding 164 from Rolls
* ignores Golovkin offering to defend against Rosado at 158
3) calls me a hypocrite
#excusemakingmuppet
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/568032Comment
-
I've never called you a hypocrite that I can recall. I've called you a lot worse than that. Since you brought it up yeah you're a hypocrite. Still waiting for those links to prove Rolls hasn't fought as a middleweight.
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/568032

the link that YOU provided... categorically proves that Steve Rolls has not made 160 since 2015
you will need to register with boxrec and login, to see the weights
btw, Steve Rolls is 35yo
---------------------------
1) cries incessantly about Canelo fighting at 155... despite the fact that Canelo never drained anyone because he fought JMW opponents who were conditioned to 154... and despite the fact that his JMW opponents may have benefited from the extra pound just as much as he did
2) ...
* totally ignored Golovkin demanding 164 from Ward
* totally ignored Golovkin demanding 164 from Rolls
* totally ignored Golovkin offering to defend against Rosado at 158... but refusing to negotiate with little old faded 153lb Cotto
3) calls me a hypocrite
--------------------------
is it... go-play-in-traffic... time, yet... ?Comment






Comment