Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin: All Of My Fights Are the Same Level

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I'm excited for this. Way too many matches to be made for guys to not fight one of the top 8. May the best man win!!!!!

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by ruedboy View Post
      Can you name a top fighter who hasn't fought low level competition.
      The problem with GGG is that 98% of his opposition is low level.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by whoseyourdaddy View Post
        The problem with GGG is that 98% of his opposition is low level.
        More a problem with the era than the fighter. Golovkin was born about 6 years too soon.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
          This must be a language barrier thing! He might prepare the same for every fight, but Vanes and Rolls are not the same level as Canelo and Dervy!



          yea thats what he meant

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by aboutfknredy View Post
            Bro come on Floyd played the numbers game late in his career, with high reward/low risk, controlling the weights/venue etc...never took real risks the last 10-15 years of his career.

            A great boxer for sure but gotta critique him too.



            what a fkn idiot

            good god you say some ****** things LMAO

            Comment


            • #46
              He treats every opponent the same. He takes no one lightly and nothing for granted. Pretty simple interpretation

              Comment


              • #47
                I would say MOST of ggg's fights were against bums. Not all. He did fight Canelo, Lemuiex and Jacobs.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by whoseyourdaddy View Post
                  The problem with GGG is that 98% of his opposition is low level.
                  You can't prove it so it's just another opinion from a fan with a bias. (Yawn)

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Problem for GGG is he has been too dominant in his Ws...if he allowed a few guys to go 12 rounds, then all of a sudden those guys would not be 'bums' and would now be 'great fighters'...when you blast everyone out and dominate them, the only recourse some have to hate is to underrate the quality of opposition.

                    He faced about 20 quality fighters/had about 20 quality fights thus far...he just has sparked out about 17 of them...everyone would call Jacobs a bum still if GGG KOed him in 11 rounds or something similar.

                    Historically most greats have a slip up every 5 or so quality fights they have...GGG had about 15 of those 'good' fights under his belt and no slips at all yet...very impressive imo.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
                      Problem for GGG is he has been too dominant in his Ws...if he allowed a few guys to go 12 rounds, then all of a sudden those guys would not be 'bums' and would now be 'great fighters'...when you blast everyone out and dominate them, the only recourse some have to hate is to underrate the quality of opposition.

                      He faced about 20 quality fighters/had about 20 quality fights thus far...he just has sparked out about 17 of them...everyone would call Jacobs a bum still if GGG KOed him in 11 rounds or something similar.

                      Historically most greats have a slip up every 5 or so quality fights they have...GGG had about 15 of those 'good' fights under his belt and no slips at all yet...very impressive imo.





                      [IMG]https://media2.*****.com/media/qmfpjpAT2fJRK/*****.gif[/IMG]






                      most of the guys Golovkin selected were no-hopers who did little to nothing either before - or since - that fight

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP