Comments Thread For: Carlos Takam Inks Co-Promotional With Top Rank
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
What do you mean who? Carlos Takam's promoter.
They just became another sham promoter working for Top Rank. Like Kathy Duva.
You are familiar with the term "sham promoter," right? That's what Bob Arum called all the promoters who were working with Al Haymon when he filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against him.
This is supposed to be a violation of the Ali Act.Comment
-
you tin foil hat wearing buffoon. you need to stop watching alex jones and be medicated!What do you mean who? Carlos Takam's promoter.
They just became another sham promoter working for Top Rank. Like Kathy Duva.
You are familiar with the term "sham promoter," right? That's what Bob Arum called all the promoters who were working with Al Haymon when he filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against him.
This is supposed to be a violation of the Ali Act.Comment
-
I just dropped a bunch of facts on you and this is how you respond? You are obviously out of your intellectual depth.
Go eat your crayons in the corner and leave this discussion to the grownups.Comment
-
-
I'm not attempting to take sides on this, or claim that Haymon did anything wrong, but the point of that allegation - valid or not - was that Haymon was claiming not to be a promoter and Ol Bob was saying that he got round this by getting other people to do the promotional work to circumvent the Ali Act. Bob's as slippery as any other promoter, but he has never claimed not to be a promoter to my knowledge so the situations are quite different... he doesn't have or need 'sham' promoters because he is a promoter. I suppose you'd say he has a number of cross promotional deals in place.What do you mean who? Carlos Takam's promoter.
They just became another sham promoter working for Top Rank. Like Kathy Duva.
You are familiar with the term "sham promoter," right? That's what Bob Arum called all the promoters who were working with Al Haymon when he filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against him.
This is supposed to be a violation of the Ali Act.Last edited by Citizen Koba; 09-26-2019, 02:14 AM.Comment
-
If Star Boxing was already Takam's promoter why does he need to pay another promoter? Exactly how many hands are supposed to get a cut of his earnings?I'm not attempting to take sides on this, or claim that Haymon did anything wrong, but the point of that allegation - valid or not - was that Haymon was claiming not to be a promoter and Ol Bob was saying that he got round this by getting other people to do the promotional work to circumvent the Ali Act. Bob's as slippery as any other promoter, but he has never claimed not to be a promoter to my knowledge so the situations are quite different... he doesn't have or need 'sham' promoters because he is a promoter. I suppose you'd say he has a number of cross promotional deals in place.Comment
-
We're seeing this a fair bit currently, I think possibly because of network exclusivity deals in place - smaller promoters; Banner, Star, Main Events, DBE basically having to cross promote with TR, PBC or Hearn to get their guys on air/stream... and I agree, it ain't good for the fighters if they're having to pay twice (although I don't know if this is the case) but it might be marginally better than not getting them air time at all. Been a lot of changes and power plays in the boxing world these last few years and the smaller promotions are having to evolve new ways of surviving.
Myself I like the messy old ways with the smaller promoters swimming round the edges always on the lookout for that one star that could break 'em into the big time, but I think those times may be at an end in this Brave New boxing world of ours.Comment
and stop crying.
Comment