Comments Thread For: Canelo: I've Done What I Had To Do Against Golovkin

[saopaulo]

the universal agreement is that boxing is rigged and fixed, GGG was clearly robbed in both fights and only delusional fanatics can't accept this just like they cant accept canelo is a steroid abusing cheat with paid off judges.

[ruedboy]

I agree that Alvarez did what he had to vs Golovkin.
Canelo fought GGG twice and the judges say he didn't lose.
He didn't get dominated or KO'd.
He showed he belonged in the same ring with GGG.
He fought well enough in the 2nd fight for some people to think he won.
Of course he didn't dominate, KO or hurt Golovkin.
But I don't think that was ever his goal anyway.
Now Canelo has , what might be called "plausible deniability" to avoid a trilogy.

[Robi13]

I just think the bar for some to give Canelo a win in those fights appears to be very low...he got outlanded and outworked almost every round they fought...I don't really slight him for that, more credit GGG for it...GGG is just very hard to beat...hard to hurt, and he is always scoring the whole fight with his stamina/jab/workrate.

If Canelo fought GGG's fight in both fights, I would have Canelo winning both by the same score...all I can say...I don't think many others would score the fights the same if that was the case.

Well the judges, who are professionals, disagree with you and so do many others. 8-4 either way is a bad score. Last time I checked the criteria to scoring bouts is...

1. Clean punching (power versus quantity).

2. Effective aggressiveness.

3. Ring generalship.

4. Defense.

I don’t see stamina in there or jabs... ggg had the work rate but was it effective???

I think canelos won both fights

[KrusherStan]

There would be a trilogy if GGG and Abel didn't open their mouths that much.

[DeeMoney]

If you're a truly great foreign fighter you will excel in America. Just ask Manny Pacquiao.

But should you have to be as great as Manny to get a fair shake?

[P4P Forever]

I said Trip G would win by late round KO's both fights. 100%. I own it. I was 100% wrong. And now I am saying something else:

Alvarez is right. He does not need a third fight with Golovkin, Golovkin needs that third fight with Alvarez. Alvarez calls the shots in his career, and until he decides otherwise, Golden Boy, Golovkin, and DAZN are out of luck.

Golovkin has several avenues he could go to prove he is still the fighter he wants to be perceived as. There are at least three big fights at 160, and he has one on tap right now. There are a whole new world of top fights to mine at 168. Win those, and 0-1-1 against Alvarez will not haunt him so bad.

You were wrong about the KO. Thats so true. Some how by saying that you lost your mind, as if GGG din't win thos fights cuz he dint KO Canelo? So he dint KO Canelo he still won!!!!! Hello!!! If canelo wants to hideout and wait till GGG is 39 yo before fighting him again, then go back that. That some real puss ****e. Canelo doesn't have to fight him again he can puss out. Just should stop talking P4P when he's afraid of a 37 yo that beat him twice and now so scared giving up prime time dates not even fighting. Sure that's a champion and a P4P champ for sure (chuckle)

[texasboi15]

I remember initially you all said Canelo was scared to move up to MW and face Golovkin

He did.

I remember you all said Canelo was scared to face Golovkin in the rematch

He did.

Now you all are once again saying he's scared to face Golovkin for a third time

Jus know you DORKS sound absolutely fcking RETARDED at this point.

[P4P Forever]

I remember initially you all said Canelo was scared to move up to MW and face Golovkin

He did.

I remember you all said Canelo was scared to face Golovkin in the rematch

He did.

Now you all are once again saying he's scared to face Golovkin for a third time

Jus know you DORKS sound absolutely fcking RETARDED at this point

People saying what Canelo's doing, hes running from a 37 yo plain and simple, twist it all you want. Everyone see it so pretend say ****** ****e. You probably think his draw on one of the cards against Mayweather was legit. This clown eats mex meat and waits out a 37 and your hyping that

[Goyotronico]

Well the judges, who are professionals, disagree with you and so do many others. 8-4 either way is a bad score. Last time I checked the criteria to scoring bouts is...

1. Clean punching (power versus quantity).

2. Effective aggressiveness.

3. Ring generalship.

4. Defense.

I don’t see stamina in there or jabs... ggg had the work rate but was it effective???

I think canelos won both fights

you're right!
1. clean punching - GGG was clean jabbing Canelo All night.

2. Effective Aggressiveness - GGG was the clear aggressor in the first fight, in the seccond even though Canelo stood his ground most of the time and some times made GGG go backwards and props for that, GGG was still being the aggressor most of the time.

3. Ring Generalship - both fighters excel in that! both have experience.

4. Defense - that's something that Canelo exceeds, still GGG aggressiveness is his defense, and even when people think that he has no defense, he just does not waste energy on big def moves, he moves his head slightly and make people miss, takes a a step backwards or just blocks with his gloves which he is effective with those kind of moves even if people don't notice them.


all in all both are great fighters, still GGG did win both fights, 1rst was clear, 2nd GGG edged it, Canelo made 1 out of 10 people think he won with him standing his ground and flashy moves.

Ohh! and those Judges that you say are professionals do tend to make mistakes, especially when there is money involved, indeed boxing is the most corrupt sport right now.

[juandabomb]

Straight b1atch arse ..canela talks that she took risks vs felding and jacobs..ggg had already fought jacobs. Before ggg canela took serious risks vs khan, liam smith & a drained chavez jr ...farsante!