Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo-Kovalev, Fury-Wallin, PEDs, More

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VatoMulatto
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2003
    • 8168
    • 289
    • 218
    • 104,445

    #101
    Originally posted by Armchairhero
    The same ones that look like Greek gods but still pass clean, year round
    You can look like a greek god without juicing and look very average and fat while juicing. You can not go by physical appearance.

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47366
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #102
      Originally posted by I'm Widdit!
      Once upon a time boxing fans didn’t have a clue about the essence of advance drug testing even when Rafael was writing hit pieces against Floyd when PAC was refusing it. In theory if an athlete is daring another boxer to commit to random drug testing far out of a fight which even Roach and PAC didn’t want 15 days ffs...

      It’s not hard to believe that Edwards is trying to get an internship from the grand master Hauser on how to create doubt for gullible readers




      I am not even insisting that Canelo is clean, I have no idea

      I am just saying... how does bread see evidence to question Canelo... but see no evidence to question Pac... ?

      ALL of breads red-flag's were checked

      I mean, bread thinks that simply not having VADA testing is su****ious... and yet, Pac flatly refused testing for YEARS, killing a superfight in the process... and he recently gave his best performance in years, in the only recent fight that did not require drug testing

      breads position is unjustifiable, and makes no sense

      like you said... even Conte said that Canelo's positive test result was most likely caused by accidental contamination

      bread is seeing red flags for one guy... and blindly ignoring red flags for another guy

      not talking about bread here, because he has pedigree... but the posters who are vocally su****ious about Canelo, while vocally defending Pacquiao... are two-faced asswipes

      Comment

      • Thuglife Nelo
        Banned
        • Dec 2018
        • 26836
        • 1,299
        • 1,822
        • 654,176

        #103
        Originally posted by CaptainWalrus
        Points at positive tests.
        Points at 365.

        If Canelo GGG 2 had been 60 days away like other high profile fights or Usyk vs Spone 20 days away or GGG vs Rolls 29 days away testing, would .6ng have depleted from Canelo?

        The answer is yes!

        Canelo has .6ng which then showed depletion to .06ng the 3rd day later, but Breadman calls that 2 failed tests when it’s just natural depletion from WADA’s own research.

        It’s ok if you ignore the Usyk or GGG examples, Breadman. You ain’t fooling anyone with your PBc propaganda

        Comment

        • Thuglife Nelo
          Banned
          • Dec 2018
          • 26836
          • 1,299
          • 1,822
          • 654,176

          #104
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          I am not even insisting that Canelo is clean, I have no idea

          I am just saying... how does bread see evidence to question Canelo... but see no evidence to question Pac... ?

          ALL of breads red-flag's were checked

          I mean, bread thinks that simply not having VADA testing is su****ious... and yet, Pac flatly
          Bread makes up the questions bro it’s all by design. He ain’t gonna dare dwelve into PAC Thurman specifics (even though he did) because he doesn’t want to cause problems with PBC business since his fighter is with Haymon. Wasn’t it Greisman or Donovan that wrote the article for VADA surrounding Thurman PAC. The only official answers we got was the NSAC saying they were handling the testing and were getting assistance from VADA. That statement itself is an oxymoron. Lol

          The site didn’t cover it because NSB is CBS Sports and such campaigns of curiousity isn’t good business nor do writers want to get blacklisted should they dwelve more into it.

          You know the answer regarding PAC. It’s because PAC is with Haymon. Breadman is Haymon. Ray Charles could see this

          Comment

          • CaptainWalrus
            Expert casual
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2019
            • 834
            • 12
            • 0
            • 14,502

            #105
            Originally posted by I'm Widdit!
            Points at 365.

            If Canelo GGG 2 had been 60 days away like other high profile fights or Usyk vs Spone 20 days away or GGG vs Rolls 29 days away testing, would .6ng have depleted from Canelo?

            The answer is yes!

            Canelo has .6ng which then showed depletion to .06ng the 3rd day later, but Breadman calls that 2 failed tests when it’s just natural depletion from WADA’s own research.

            It’s ok if you ignore the Usyk or GGG examples, Breadman. You ain’t fooling anyone with your PBc propaganda
            Next you will be telling me that Canelo ate a whole bull in one sitting and popped!

            Comment

            • CaptainWalrus
              Expert casual
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • May 2019
              • 834
              • 12
              • 0
              • 14,502

              #106
              Originally posted by I'm Widdit!
              Bread makes up the questions bro it’s all by design. He ain’t gonna dare dwelve into PAC Thurman specifics (even though he did) because he doesn’t want to cause problems with PBC business since his fighter is with Haymon. Wasn’t it Greisman or Donovan that wrote the article for VADA surrounding Thurman PAC. The only official answers we got was the NSAC saying they were handling the testing and were getting assistance from VADA. That statement itself is an oxymoron. Lol

              The site didn’t cover it because NSB is CBS Sports and such campaigns of curiousity isn’t good business nor do writers want to get blacklisted should they dwelve more into it.

              You know the answer regarding PAC. It’s because PAC is with Haymon. Breadman is Haymon. Ray Charles could see this
              Now we have a mailbag conspiracy theory... Did you go to area 51 yesterday?

              Comment

              • Jab jab boom
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2018
                • 11143
                • 4,831
                • 296
                • 118,331

                #107
                Originally posted by I'm Widdit!
                Actually you’re missing the point. Name other SNAC fighters saying their opponents need at least 90 days or no fight. Think about that hard for a second and then ask if any of them ever enrolled in 365.

                The fact that Jrock under PBC is allowed to make such statements, which let’s be honest, he’s only saying that because he’s with Contez. We’ve seen that many times whenever Conte has a fighter lined up for a date Team SNAC spooks and gets in their opponents minds.

                What’s even funnier, again, the grand high priest praised Canelo and he himself acknowledged meat contamination and threw all fighters under the bus regarding open season when fighters aren’t 365. So why doesn’t Conte MANDATE 365 for any of his SNAC athletes? Why would a SNAC fighter be hesitant for that?

                If we get the point, the you’ll finally understand these phantom articles by Breadman because he ain’t getting the McGirt type of pay and just hating like most LDBc kids do about Canelo while making RJJ and Toney debates about how great they were.

                Yeah it’s all racial. Doesn’t matter if you come off as Steve Urkle, when pride hits, sometimes writers go overboard. We’ve seen it all before by other haters like Dan Rafael for years.
                there are less than 5 fighters in the entire sport doing vada 24/7-365, so that shoots down the entire conspiracy theory of your first paragraph and renders the rest of your post useless. It's just you grasping at straws in a failed attempt to defend Canelo (someone who has already tested positive) while implicating others (who have never tested positive) .

                Comment

                • Thuglife Nelo
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2018
                  • 26836
                  • 1,299
                  • 1,822
                  • 654,176

                  #108
                  Originally posted by CaptainWalrus
                  Did you go to area 51 yesterday?
                  Nah I went to Conte’s gym and I saw Jrock doing SNAC commercials! Stay in your lane Bread!

                  Comment

                  • Thuglife Nelo
                    Banned
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 26836
                    • 1,299
                    • 1,822
                    • 654,176

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Jab jab boom
                    there are less than 5 fighters in the entire sport doing vada 24/7-365, so that shoots down the entire conspiracy theory
                    Wtf?! You mean the least amount of fighters doing 365 shoots down what “conspiracy” theory exactly? Not sure you know a conspiracy theory is. What’s your angle? That because nobody’s doing 365 that all other boxers are exempt? Wtf are you talking about! Lol

                    Comment

                    • Jab jab boom
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2018
                      • 11143
                      • 4,831
                      • 296
                      • 118,331

                      #110
                      Originally posted by I'm Widdit!
                      Wtf?! You mean the least amount of fighters doing 365 shoots down what “conspiracy” theory exactly? Not sure you know a conspiracy theory is. What’s your angle? That because nobody’s doing 365 that all other boxers are exempt? Wtf are you talking about! Lol
                      damn, you get less intelligent every time you post. You're strictly focusing on j rock working with snac and saying there's a reason why fighters who work with snac aren't doing vada 24/7. How is that a valid point when hardly anyone is doing vada 24/7? So at the very least, if a fighter is insisting on testing 3 months out prior to a fight with him, that should be commended instead of used as a reason to suspect him. Because, testing 3 months out from every fight is better than what 99% of fighters are actually doing right now. You're going out of your way to defend someone who has actually tested positive yet used a built in excuse in Mexico with tainted meat, but going out of your way to implicate someone who has never tested positive and is asking for all of his opponents to test at least 3 months out from a fight. You make no sense.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP