Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo-Kovalev, Fury-Wallin, PEDs, More
Collapse
-
-
Once upon a time boxing fans didn’t have a clue about the essence of advance drug testing even when Rafael was writing hit pieces against Floyd when PAC was refusing it. In theory if an athlete is daring another boxer to commit to random drug testing far out of a fight which even Roach and PAC didn’t want 15 days ffs...
It’s not hard to believe that Edwards is trying to get an internship from the grand master Hauser on how to create doubt for gullible readers
I am not even insisting that Canelo is clean, I have no idea
I am just saying... how does bread see evidence to question Canelo... but see no evidence to question Pac... ?
ALL of breads red-flag's were checked
I mean, bread thinks that simply not having VADA testing is su****ious... and yet, Pac flatly refused testing for YEARS, killing a superfight in the process... and he recently gave his best performance in years, in the only recent fight that did not require drug testing
breads position is unjustifiable, and makes no sense
like you said... even Conte said that Canelo's positive test result was most likely caused by accidental contamination
bread is seeing red flags for one guy... and blindly ignoring red flags for another guy
not talking about bread here, because he has pedigree... but the posters who are vocally su****ious about Canelo, while vocally defending Pacquiao... are two-faced asswipesComment
-
Points at 365.
If Canelo GGG 2 had been 60 days away like other high profile fights or Usyk vs Spone 20 days away or GGG vs Rolls 29 days away testing, would .6ng have depleted from Canelo?
The answer is yes!
Canelo has .6ng which then showed depletion to .06ng the 3rd day later, but Breadman calls that 2 failed tests when it’s just natural depletion from WADA’s own research.
It’s ok if you ignore the Usyk or GGG examples, Breadman. You ain’t fooling anyone with your PBc propagandaComment
-
I am not even insisting that Canelo is clean, I have no idea
I am just saying... how does bread see evidence to question Canelo... but see no evidence to question Pac... ?
ALL of breads red-flag's were checked
I mean, bread thinks that simply not having VADA testing is su****ious... and yet, Pac flatly
The site didn’t cover it because NSB is CBS Sports and such campaigns of curiousity isn’t good business nor do writers want to get blacklisted should they dwelve more into it.
You know the answer regarding PAC. It’s because PAC is with Haymon. Breadman is Haymon. Ray Charles could see thisComment
-
Points at 365.
If Canelo GGG 2 had been 60 days away like other high profile fights or Usyk vs Spone 20 days away or GGG vs Rolls 29 days away testing, would .6ng have depleted from Canelo?
The answer is yes!
Canelo has .6ng which then showed depletion to .06ng the 3rd day later, but Breadman calls that 2 failed tests when it’s just natural depletion from WADA’s own research.
It’s ok if you ignore the Usyk or GGG examples, Breadman. You ain’t fooling anyone with your PBc propagandaComment
-
Bread makes up the questions bro it’s all by design. He ain’t gonna dare dwelve into PAC Thurman specifics (even though he did) because he doesn’t want to cause problems with PBC business since his fighter is with Haymon. Wasn’t it Greisman or Donovan that wrote the article for VADA surrounding Thurman PAC. The only official answers we got was the NSAC saying they were handling the testing and were getting assistance from VADA. That statement itself is an oxymoron. Lol
The site didn’t cover it because NSB is CBS Sports and such campaigns of curiousity isn’t good business nor do writers want to get blacklisted should they dwelve more into it.
You know the answer regarding PAC. It’s because PAC is with Haymon. Breadman is Haymon. Ray Charles could see thisComment
-
Actually you’re missing the point. Name other SNAC fighters saying their opponents need at least 90 days or no fight. Think about that hard for a second and then ask if any of them ever enrolled in 365.
The fact that Jrock under PBC is allowed to make such statements, which let’s be honest, he’s only saying that because he’s with Contez. We’ve seen that many times whenever Conte has a fighter lined up for a date Team SNAC spooks and gets in their opponents minds.
What’s even funnier, again, the grand high priest praised Canelo and he himself acknowledged meat contamination and threw all fighters under the bus regarding open season when fighters aren’t 365. So why doesn’t Conte MANDATE 365 for any of his SNAC athletes? Why would a SNAC fighter be hesitant for that?
If we get the point, the you’ll finally understand these phantom articles by Breadman because he ain’t getting the McGirt type of pay and just hating like most LDBc kids do about Canelo while making RJJ and Toney debates about how great they were.
Yeah it’s all racial. Doesn’t matter if you come off as Steve Urkle, when pride hits, sometimes writers go overboard. We’ve seen it all before by other haters like Dan Rafael for years.Comment
-
Comment
-
Wtf?! You mean the least amount of fighters doing 365 shoots down what “conspiracy” theory exactly? Not sure you know a conspiracy theory is. What’s your angle? That because nobody’s doing 365 that all other boxers are exempt? Wtf are you talking about! LolComment
-
damn, you get less intelligent every time you post. You're strictly focusing on j rock working with snac and saying there's a reason why fighters who work with snac aren't doing vada 24/7. How is that a valid point when hardly anyone is doing vada 24/7? So at the very least, if a fighter is insisting on testing 3 months out prior to a fight with him, that should be commended instead of used as a reason to suspect him. Because, testing 3 months out from every fight is better than what 99% of fighters are actually doing right now. You're going out of your way to defend someone who has actually tested positive yet used a built in excuse in Mexico with tainted meat, but going out of your way to implicate someone who has never tested positive and is asking for all of his opponents to test at least 3 months out from a fight. You make no sense.Comment
Comment