Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo-Kovalev, Fury-Wallin, PEDs, More
Collapse
-
REFUSING/OBSTRUCTING a test... is WORSE !!
in the amateurs, if you avoid/obstruct a drug test.....
* you are immediately judged guilty
* you are immediately stripped
* you are immediately banned
the guy killed a super-fight by refusing random blood tests back in 2010 when he was a 1200+ punch dynamo... citing a bunch of ridiculous excuses... and yet NONE of those silly excuses were even mentioned ONCE when Pac finally agreed to testing... oh, and by that time he was a normal 450-550 punch fighter, like everyone else
come on man, that is a HUGE red-flag... that is all I am saying
it has nothing to do with " like ".....
Canelo did not hook up with Alex Ariza at 32yo, and then suddenly DOUBLE his punch output while skipping through FOUR divisions
I am absolutely calling bread biased... hanging Canelo from the highest tree... while giving the test-avoiding, punch-output doubling, Pacquiao... a total free pass... is not a balanced viewpoint
the current topic, which I am sick of... is not Pacquiao, it is breads harsh viewpoint on Canelo... FACT: there are MANY red-flags, ALL of which should be obvious to bread...
... I will not post them, because I do not care for the PED debate, again... and do not wish to inflame the lunatics... but I will add a link to prove that those red-flags should be highly obvious to bread... post #255... https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...teward&page=26
the 1200+ punches that Pac youthfully threw at Clottey... while looking fresh-as-a-daisy... before center-staging a full concert for his fans immediately afterwards... AFTER skipping through THREE divisions in 9 months... were ridiculous, AND ARE A HUGE RED FLAG to anyone with a clue... including bread
Those are YOUR standards.
YOUR standards.
Bread said he needs to see a test or evidence.
You keep expecting him to go by YOUR standard of what's worst.
The bottom line is, if Pacquiao did something, he was smart enough to never fail a test or get caught doing it.
When you get hired by a publication or website to do your Mailbag, then YOU can choose to count dodging tests with the same standard as you do failing a test or getting caught doing it.
But nobody's paying you to do that, mostly because you're opinions are shxt.Comment
-
Comment
-
Again.
Those are YOUR standards.
YOUR standards.
Bread said he needs to see a test or evidence.
You keep expecting him to go by YOUR standard of what's worst.
The bottom line is, if Pacquiao did something, he was smart enough to never fail a test or get caught doing it.
When you get hired by a publication or website to do your Mailbag, then YOU can choose to count dodging tests with the same standard as you do failing a test or getting caught doing it.
But nobody's paying you to do that, mostly because you're opinions are shxt.
I am expecting bread to use some common-sense
of course, now I will need to post the pac-facts
bread, is well-aware of the following information... no idea why he decided to ignore it
FACT: nobody relevant is listening to him whining about Canelo... and nobody should if he cannot keep it real about Pac
1)
FACT: Pac killed a SUPER-FIGHT by refusing random blood tests....
FACT: random blood tests are completely harmless
FACT: there is ONLY one reason to avoid random blood tests
FACT: in the amateurs, if you avoid/obstruct a drug test, you.....
* are immediately judged guilty
* you are stripped
* you are banned
2)
Pacquiao gave a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses to avoid random blood tests, which is beyond absurd..... we needed one genuine reason, but we got 8 childish excuses..... the only reason why we got 8 childish excuses, is because there was no genuine reason
then SUDDENLY, those 8 ridiculous excuses up and disappeared without a trace, and were never mentioned ONCE when Pac finally agreed to testing
come on kid, tell us which one of those 8 ridiculous excuses you believed..... this will be funny..... come on, tell us which one of those ridiculous excuses worked for you, so that we can see how you roll
3)
FACT: Pac has the 2nd highest recorded weight-gain in boxing history at 40lbs
the highest recorded weight-gain in recorded history is 41lbs....
and it was made by a HEAVYWEIGHT who used steroids to get there
FACT: Pacquiao is a fkn midget compared to Roy Jones Jnr..... when Jones gained 41lbs, he was cheating...... and yet when Pacquiao gained 40lbs, you think that he was clean..... right ?
it is soooo clearly obvious what happened, but not to you, right?
Pac is the size of one of Jones legs, you muppet
4)
immediately after the second Marquez fight, Manny Steward stated that Pac should consider retiring..... he said that Manny looked shopworn and had been in too many wars.....
Manny then linked up with Alex Ariza
immediately following Pac's next fight against David Diaz, Steward was gushing with praise, saying that Manny looked rejuvenated/revitalized, and a completely different fighter
and NO, Steward was not throwing Manny under a bus, he was simply commenting on what he saw
what happened next..... ? here, let me remind you.....
Pac then skipped through THREE DIVISIONS in 9 months, gaining 12lbs of muscle..... seemingly increasing his speed/power and (get this) punch output..... while looking as fresh as a daisy..... wtf?
you know absolutely nothing about boxing if that does not seem su****ious to you
Pac turned from a shopworn fighter, into a 1200+ punch dynamo, who (coincidentally) refused to test..... then, Pac just as suddenly reverted back into a normal 400-500 punch fighter who looked tired at the end of a fight, and (coincidentally) he suddenly had no problem taking blood tests
LMAO
5)
a number of knowledgeable insiders, all of which are extremely knowledgeable and extremely experienced, have stated that Pacquiao was juicing..... from Atlas to Mayweather to Malignaggi to Mosley, and a number of fighters in/around wildcard
it is only you who failed to notice..... why is that ?Comment
-
Again.
Those are YOUR standards.
YOUR standards.
Bread said he needs to see a test or evidence.
You keep expecting him to go by YOUR standard of what's worst.
The bottom line is, if Pacquiao did something, he was smart enough to never fail a test or get caught doing it.
When you get hired by a publication or website to do your Mailbag, then YOU can choose to count dodging tests with the same standard as you do failing a test or getting caught doing it.
But nobody's paying you to do that, mostly because you're opinions are shxt.
FACT: when Pacquiao flatly refused to undertake random blood testing... he gave a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses... which is absurd, because we needed one genuine reason
the only reason why somebody would furnish 8 ridiculous excuses... is because they did not have 1 genuine reason
so, which one of those 8 ridiculous excuses worked for you... ?
serious question... lets find out how you roll, Mr Public Defender
which one of the 8 RIDICULOUS excuses proved by Pacquiao did you accept... which pile of shlt worked for you ? LMAO
by the way... the 8 ridiculous show-stopping excuses provided by Pac, IMMEDIATELY disappeared and were never mentioned ONCE when Manny finally agreed to testing...
which pile of shlt did you accept as justification for killing a super-fight?... I DO expect an answerComment
-
REFUSING/OBSTRUCTING a test... is WORSE !!
in the amateurs, if you avoid/obstruct a drug test.....
* you are immediately judged guilty
* you are immediately stripped
* you are immediately banned
the guy killed a super-fight by refusing random blood tests back in 2010 when he was a 1200+ punch dynamo... citing a bunch of ridiculous excuses... and yet NONE of those silly excuses were even mentioned ONCE when Pac finally agreed to testing... oh, and by that time he was a normal 450-550 punch fighter, like everyone else
come on man, that is a HUGE red-flag... that is all I am saying
it has nothing to do with " like ".....
Canelo did not hook up with Alex Ariza at 32yo, and then suddenly DOUBLE his punch output while skipping through FOUR divisions
I am absolutely calling bread biased... hanging Canelo from the highest tree... while giving the test-avoiding, punch-output doubling, Pacquiao... a total free pass... is not a balanced viewpoint
the current topic, which I am sick of... is not Pacquiao, it is breads harsh viewpoint on Canelo... FACT: there are MANY red-flags, ALL of which should be obvious to bread...
... I will not post them, because I do not care for the PED debate, again... and do not wish to inflame the lunatics... but I will add a link to prove that those red-flags should be highly obvious to bread... post #255... https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...teward&page=26
the 1200+ punches that Pac youthfully threw at Clottey... while looking fresh-as-a-daisy... before center-staging a full concert for his fans immediately afterwards... AFTER skipping through THREE divisions in 9 months... were ridiculous, AND ARE A HUGE RED FLAG to anyone with a clue... including breadComment
-
FACT: when Pacquiao flatly refused to undertake random blood testing... he gave a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses... which is absurd, because we needed one genuine reason
the only reason why somebody would furnish 8 ridiculous excuses... is because they did not have 1 genuine reason
so, which one of those 8 ridiculous excuses worked for you... ?
serious question... lets find out how you roll, Mr Public Defender
which one of the 8 RIDICULOUS excuses proved by Pacquiao did you accept... which pile of shlt worked for you ? LMAO
by the way... the 8 ridiculous show-stopping excuses provided by Pac, IMMEDIATELY disappeared and were never mentioned ONCE when Manny finally agreed to testing...
which pile of shlt did you accept as justification for killing a super-fight?... I DO expect an answer
Which one is it?
I'm not here to relitigate the Floyd/Manny saga.
I'm not a stan or hater of either (unlike you).
Bread stated his standards that he uses to condemn fighters.
It's his consistent standard that he even used against the guy who knocked his guy out.
Get over it.
And yeah, lots of people listen to Breadman, which is why he has this article, his website, and is the trainer of a world champion boxer.
Its YOU nobody cares about, which is why you are just posting here and half the posters on here have you on ignore.
I think I'll join themComment
-
Dude, you're either high, ******, or retxrded.
Which one is it?
I'm not here to relitigate the Floyd/Manny saga.
I'm not a stan or hater of either (unlike you).
Bread stated his standards that he uses to condemn fighters.
It's his consistent standard that he even used against the guy who knocked his guy out.
Get over it.
And yeah, lots of people listen to Breadman, which is why he has this article, his website, and is the trainer of a world champion boxer.
Its YOU nobody cares about, which is why you are just posting here and half the posters on here have you on ignore.
I think I'll join them
it is not a consistent standard
refusing to test for 5 years is a red flag
in the amateurs, refusing to test ONCE... means that you are guilty... no red flag required, immediately stripped and bannedComment
-
Dude, you're either high, ******, or retxrded.
Which one is it?
I'm not here to relitigate the Floyd/Manny saga.
I'm not a stan or hater of either (unlike you).
Bread stated his standards that he uses to condemn fighters.
It's his consistent standard that he even used against the guy who knocked his guy out.
Get over it.
And yeah, lots of people listen to Breadman, which is why he has this article, his website, and is the trainer of a world champion boxer.
Its YOU nobody cares about, which is why you are just posting here and half the posters on here have you on ignore.
I think I'll join them
why did Pacquiao kill a super-fight by refusing random blood tests?
that is a more than reasonable question man
which one of those 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?Comment
Comment