Floyd Is better the end
Better fighter, Floyd or Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
-
Whilst they were both in primes, although Floyd was considered no1 pfp, Pac was widely acknowledged as having better resume with better wins.
You can be no1 pfp without necessarily having best resume look at Crawford and lomo for example.
Pacs greater than floyd. Boxing scene forum polls confirm this time after time, and it's usually not closeLast edited by hugh grant; 09-19-2019, 03:08 PM.Comment
-
-
To me Pac is the better fighter pfp. Mayweather is a full sized welterweight while Pac is more of a lightweight. If they were the same exact size naturally I would give Pac the edge. In fact I think Pac would beat him right now. If he says his shoulder was injured I believe him.Comment
-
On second thought Maybe Mayweather has the edge all things considered. Mayweather is very consistent and always wins. Pac has bad nights like when Marquez KOed him. Floyd handled Marquez with ease. So in the time of two minutes I am changing my pick from Pac to Floyd but they are very close. Floyd never has those bad nights that Pac sometimes had and he can fight any style of opponent with success.Comment
-
Floyd was the better fighter
In terms of greater career, you can make a case for both
I truly believe Floyd would have beaten him 10 times out of 10 at any point, and I probably consider myself more of a Manny fanComment
-
- -TUE 50-0 for $$$ and Manny for fighting.
Manny closer to $$$ than TUE 50-0 is for fighting.
Guys a sissy.Comment
-
Pac has the greater career and accomplishments. BH has 8 or 9 losses but most say he's a better fighter than calzage, even though He has loss to calzage also.
I don't think a case can be made for floyd being greater than pacComment
Comment