I don’t think so.
It was a bad cut but it was handled pretty well, he was winning clearly and although it affected him he didn’t get hit a massive amount.
Not everything has to be politics, I’m sure if he was getting battered and the cut got progressively worse they would’ve stopped it.
If Wallin got that exact same cut he likely would’ve been hit much more than Fury was with the cut (and losing the fight clearly as opposed to winning a messy fight) because Fury is better than him and the cut would’ve gotten worse, so I don’t think it’s as straight forward to say it would’ve been stopped just because Wallin wasn’t the name fighter.
It was a bad cut but it was handled pretty well, he was winning clearly and although it affected him he didn’t get hit a massive amount.
Not everything has to be politics, I’m sure if he was getting battered and the cut got progressively worse they would’ve stopped it.
If Wallin got that exact same cut he likely would’ve been hit much more than Fury was with the cut (and losing the fight clearly as opposed to winning a messy fight) because Fury is better than him and the cut would’ve gotten worse, so I don’t think it’s as straight forward to say it would’ve been stopped just because Wallin wasn’t the name fighter.
Comment