Should Wallin have been awarded a TKO victory?

[Marchegiano]

No, they'd've let Wallin fight on too. It's a cut above the brow. You know, where pro wrestler's "draw color"?

[Guest]

What is this now???

You've heard all about the legend of Danny Williams, right?

Some people detract the Tyson fight, because Tyson was so old. However, it's not true - they got an '88 prime Tyson, used make up to make him look older, and then sent him forward to fight Danny in a time machine.

The same time machine that Rocky Marciano refused to get in, and quit the sport over.

[Redd Foxx]

As the man said, it was like the "Vittilie Klitschko" cut. This was politics.

[REDEEMER]

People are not looking at the actual cut that was effecting his vision and that was the small one above the eye not the gash. Fight should've been stopped but its the Doctors /ref discretion so I voted maybe.

[REDEEMER]

No, they'd've let Wallin fight on too. It's a cut above the brow. You know, where pro wrestler's "draw color"?

This is just a really dumb post as always, Ha

Pro Wrestler don't slice huge gashes on their face or cut themselves above the eye ,you do know he had two cuts right ? Of course you didn't. Ha

If Wallin had been cut up like that he wouldn't have been allowed to continue for one his trainer Joe Gamache would feel he needs to protect his young fighter and two he would be more prone to get hit then Fury who had the leverage of punching down on him and the commission itself would have seen an under dog taking to much risk in there so the fight would be waved off, so once again thanks for the laughs. Ha

[Marchegiano]

This is just a really dumb post as always, Ha

Pro Wrestler don't slice huge gashes on their face or cut themselves above the eye ,you do know he had two cuts right ? Of course you didn't. Ha

If Wallin had been cut up like that he wouldn't have been allowed to continue for one his trainer Joe Gamache would feel he needs to protect his young fighter and two he would be more prone to get hit then Fury who had the leverage of punching down on him and the commission itself would have seen an under dog taking to much risk in there so the fight would be waved off, so once again thanks for the laughs. Ha

I make prosthetics for a living, you're just a **** who repeats the **** he's told. I have actual medical credentials, you're just some random ****. You can't even claim I'm bad or low end at my job, I'm pioneer and inventor in my field.

I'm sorry my comment made yer ***** dry up.

If you want to know why it's a really good spot to have a nasty cut and not fear anything but a scar I can explain it. If you just want to be right, go **** yerself, this isn't an argument you can win without a few years of college, some work experience, and some accolades in some field at least remotely relative.

Know-nothing know-it-alls, I swear to ****.

[Split Decision]

If Wallin had the same cut(s) it would absolutely 100% of been stopped. so yeah. probobly / definately.

100% of been stopped
probobly
definately

just how dumb are you m8 ?

[GhostofDempsey]

Tough one to call. Some refs may have stopped it, Weeks didn't. Some refs may also have deducted points from Wallin for raking Fury's cut with his gloves after the bell rang. I guess we got to see Fury's heart after all is said and done. He managed to fight through it and get a gritty win. I have to wonder how Wilder or AJ would have handled that adversity.

[famicommander]

If Wallin were cut like that instead of Fury it would have been stopped.

[mlac]

100% of been stopped
probobly
definately

just how dumb are you m8 ?

im reffering to the poll options you mong. great post though m8.