in just 3 years the uk hearniacs and aj fanatics have become the worst batch of posters in this sites history
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Otto Wallin would Be Wilders Best Win.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by REDEEMER View PostI'm not sure you understand Wilder hasn't fought a great pedigree 6'6 fighter with skill besides Fury at 6'9 who general consensus said he lost to ?
We knew almost nothing about Wallin before yesterday night, and all we really know now is that he couldn't put away a badly injured Fury.
Comment
-
Originally posted by REDEEMER View PostYou said Wallin was a bum and didn't know who he was a few months ago? What does Ortiz do better then Wallin besides hit harder with the leading right hand to show who has more credibility, me or you ?Um, some of that yes, but most of it you're just assuming.
I never said I didn't know about Wallin. I've known Wallin longer than I've known you, actually. It just so happens I've been trolling TheGoldenOne on Youtube over Wallin/Wilder for years. He's just a countrymen, not a boxing youtuber, but he's aware and I like to **** with him.
I'm a HW fan my dude. I keep up with all the unbeaten HWs in the first few pages of boxrec.
I didn't talk to you about Ortiz either bubba.That's just you assuming again. I dunno what to tell you. I regard Ortiz as a south american hypejob. The height of his career is doing well against a champion, once. I think that speaks for itself. Big picture, yes Ortiz is very good, compared to the top, Josh, Wilder, Andy, and Fury...might favor him over Andy, maybe.
I stand by what I said about Wallin. Calling Wallin a bum does not amount to being unaware of Wallin, nor does it amount to exalting Ortiz.
That said, of course he's a bum, the height of his career is doing well against a guy who is good but not good enough to have a legitimate world championship strapped around him since 2015. Soak it in buddy. You're polishing a turd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingraya View PostWhat are you asking me here?
We knew almost nothing about Wallin before yesterday night, and all we really know now is that he couldn't put away a badly injured Fury.
The badly injured Fury was caused by a bum according to you guys and now deflecting Wallin couldn't put him away is pathetic, Ha
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View PostUm, some of that yes, but most of it you're just assuming.
I never said I didn't know about Wallin. I've known Wallin longer than I've known you, actually. It just so happens I've been trolling TheGoldenOne on Youtube over Wallin/Wilder for years. He's just a countrymen, not a boxing youtuber, but he's aware and I like to **** with him.
I'm a HW fan my dude. I keep up with all the unbeaten HWs in the first few pages of boxrec.
I didn't talk to you about Ortiz either bubba.That's just you assuming again. I dunno what to tell you. I regard Ortiz as a south american hypejob. The height of his career is doing well against a champion, once. I think that speaks for itself. Big picture, yes Ortiz is very good, compared to the top, Josh, Wilder, Andy, and Fury...might favor him over Andy, maybe.
I stand by what I said about Wallin. Calling Wallin a bum does not amount to being unaware of Wallin, nor does it amount to exalting Ortiz.
That said, of course he's a bum, the height of his career is doing well against a guy who is good but not good enough to have a legitimate world championship strapped around him since 2015. Soak it in buddy. You're polishing a turd.
I'll make you a permanent ban bet that you stated you never heard of Wallin and quote it by responding to it and end all your lying on here ,so unless you agrre ,nothing more to say ,but be weary I save things on here.and wont be going anywhere ?
You are challenging me about Wallin so why wouldn't I bring up Ortiz who is wilder best win ? Really you lack any adult fundamentals besides history which isn't rocket science ,its reading books which most become robots anyway,you basically have no real thoughts yourself. HaLast edited by REDEEMER; 09-15-2019, 09:26 PM.
Comment
-
He would not even be close to Wilder's best win. I'll bet nobody on here ever heard of him before he became Fury's latest cherrypick. He never beat anybody good. Ortiz is 40 not 50. Where do you get the mistaken idea Ortiz is almost 50???? Look him up on boxrec if you want to be accurate about his age. Wilder would KO Wallin within a few rounds in my opinion. Time will tell how good Wallin is but I doubt he ever makes any reputable top 10 rankings.
Comment
-
If Wilder had knocked Wallin out in 1, most on here would have claimed he knocked out a nobody.
And they would have been right.
I like Wallin but he has exactly 1 quality opponent, Fury. At best Wallin lost to Fury 116-112.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4truth View PostIf Wilder had knocked Wallin out in 1, most on here would have claimed he knocked out a nobody.
And they would have been right.
I like Wallin but he has exactly 1 quality opponent, Fury. At best Wallin lost to Fury 116-112.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostHe would not even be close to Wilder's best win. I'll bet nobody on here ever heard of him before he became Fury's latest cherrypick. He never beat anybody good. Ortiz is 40 not 50. Where do you get the mistaken idea Ortiz is almost 50???? Look him up on boxrec if you want to be accurate about his age. Wilder would KO Wallin within a few rounds in my opinion. Time will tell how good Wallin is but I doubt he ever makes any reputable top 10 rankings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andocom View PostHe was ranked 4th with the WBA and 11th with the IBF coming into the fight wasn't he? Not sure how you classify them, as saying reputable and ranking orgs in the same sentence is pretty tough.
Comment
Comment