Otto Wallin would Be Wilders Best Win.

[REDEEMER]

Yeah of course... It has to be Wilder's condition, etc... Things that you speculate on and call facts. If it does not fit your innane narrative right? What an idiot you are.

I don't remember who I picked when Wilder fought breazeale. Does not matter. It is immaterial to your ridiculous assesment about Wallin and how you twist and create misinformation to try to be right when you are so obviously wrong and misinformed.

I don't think exposing your ******ity is making me look like a fool... Ha! I just had to do so as the stench of your BS was polluting the rest of the boards.

You have selective memory, you once again made lies up and couldn’t provide any wrong picks I have got wrong the many of them ? Ironically the few I did was the same one you got wrong ?

I have no idea what the rest of your post means it’s an obvious attempt to discuss nothing . Like I said guys like you will be picked apart here ,you have to actually discuss facts and have a very strong argument if you trying to disprove someone. You know it won’t happen in this section. Oh silly Billy...you so silly .

[billeau2]

Common opponents would Szpilka and Ortiz ?Ha

Both fights where he really struggled to take rounds against southpaws ,and as far as his jab he has gotten worse so what is speculation about that ? I don’t think you know what the word speculation means because it is Wilders flaws that are the problem more then who he’s fought ,the killers according to him .

He always struggles to take rounds lol... His jab has developed and its obvious watching tape... its obvious to anyone with a brain.

[billeau2]

You have selective memory, you once again made lies up and couldn’t provide any wrong picks I have got wrong the many of them ? Ironically the few I did was the same one you got wrong ?

I have no idea what the rest of your post means it’s an obvious attempt to discuss nothing . Like I said guys like you will be picked apart here ,you have to actually discuss facts and have a very strong argument if you trying to disprove someone. You know it won’t happen in this section. Oh silly Billy...you so silly .

You won lol... Worse poster ever! Ha! I love these threads as they cement your legacy. You might be in contention with the original Elroy as the biggest idiot ever to post here... I might run a pol in the dome actually!

[REDEEMER]

He always struggles to take rounds lol... His jab has developed and its obvious watching tape... its obvious to anyone with a brain.

Most posters consider Wilders best showcase of boxing was years ago, so no he hasn’t . Do a poll I bet you look foolish if you try and convince the forum that Wilder has looked better behind the jab from say 2015 ?

You can have opinions on here but like I said if you don’t have facts on here you will get picked apart . If you actually followed Wilder you would know he said skills aren’t needed and overated , he started being a less effective as a jabber boxer through arrogant behavior, kind of like someone on here ? Ha

[billeau2]

Most posters consider Wilders best showcase of boxing was years ago, so no he hasn’t . Do a poll I bet you look foolish if you try and convince the forum that Wilder has looked better behind the jab from say 2015 ?

You can have opinions on here but like I said if you don’t have facts on here you will get picked apart . If you actually followed Wilder you would know he said skills aren’t needed and overated , he started being a less effective as a jabber boxer through arrogant behavior, kind of like someone on here ? Ha

lol again... who gave a time line for Wilder? I said his jab has improved with time and it absolutely has. And where do you get off saying Wilder looked better years ago? In desperation and back tracking you then throw an arbitrary date in there... You really are a slow one... a real "silly Billy" yourself lol. And no one "started being less through arrogance." It just does not work that way.

you create these self deluded, tortious scenarios then call them facts... They are, often enough, wrong, WHEN they can even be stated coherently enough to be understood. Heres a hint... Arrogence is not an antecedent for a jab. That is low IQ processing of two distinct situations: A fighter's attitude and a technical situation. So, we may say "Broner's attitude has caused a decline in his ability in the ring..." One does not say "Broner's left hook is off because of his attitude."

Now regarding Wilder, if you just read the post s l o w l y....... Since around the second Stiverne fight, Wilder working with Breland, developed his jab as a means of setting up his punches. Whether his jab is overated, whatever is a debate... No one gets picked apart having an opinion on the merits of Wilder's preparation.

Wilder's best years are not behind him. He lost a seminal fight to Fury and people want to see where this has left him. You really cannot understand this?

Ok class is dismissed Ha! Lucky for you I taught special education and might be able to get you thinking somewhat straighter... Heres a hint. Stop trying to get people... You have been trying for months now and it always backfires on you, you silly billy you... Ha!