Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: I'm P4P #1 - Crawford is Second, Canelo is Third

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Mirus View Post
    No. clenelo lost to old GGG twice. he lost to Lara. he beat old cotto.

    his only win is Jacobs which is also conroversial.

    by the way, he is a DRUG CHEATER
    Yeah sure thing Miley Cyrus

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Mirus View Post
      No. clenelo lost to old GGG twice. he lost to Lara. he beat old cotto.

      his only win is Jacobs which is also conroversial.

      by the way, he is a DRUG CHEATER
      I just love people who rewrite history. Boxingrec and any site you visit had Canelo winning GGG x1 and draw, he beat Lara, he beat Jacobs. The only other folks that attempt to rewrite history are ********. Then again in today’s pumpkin ****e, millennial generation nothing surprises me.

      Comment


      • #33
        Sorry but currently Canelo (pains me to say this) is Pound for Pound number 1 at the moment. Sorry but Loma, Spence have yet to do much, Crawford has more of a claim then those 2. Wilder, GGG and Kov round it out.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View Post
          I just love people who rewrite history. Boxingrec and any site you visit had Canelo winning GGG x1 and draw, he beat Lara, he beat Jacobs. The only other folks that attempt to rewrite history are ********. Then again in today’s pumpkin ****e, millennial generation nothing surprises me.
          Lara and GGG were robbed. they tried to rob even mayweather. clenelo = giftnelo

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Mirus View Post
            No. clenelo lost to old GGG twice. he lost to Lara. he beat old cotto.

            his only win is Jacobs which is also conroversial.

            by the way, he is a DRUG CHEATER
            Did you think Jacobs won?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View Post
              I just love people who rewrite history. Boxingrec and any site you visit had Canelo winning GGG x1 and draw, he beat Lara, he beat Jacobs. The only other folks that attempt to rewrite history are ********. Then again in today’s pumpkin ****e, millennial generation nothing surprises me.
              enjoy reading history about clenelo drug cheating, adelaide byrd and cj ross judging...

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by candyman441 View Post
                He can't be pound for pound with that loss on his record that he never avenged. 1. Crawford 2. Spence 3. Wilder 4. Canelo 5. Ggg

                Can't be on the list as he has a loss he never avenged, puts Canelo on list.
                Do you actually read your own posts?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Cant argue with the guy he has a pretty good case to be at the Top P4P but he shouldnt be no. 1... His lose against Salido and knocked down by Linares says something about him that he is not that very Special. We still need to see for the years to come, but for now putting him no.1 is a Godly generousity.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Boxing Hero View Post
                    To be honest, Canelo has the best resume than anyone in boxing. I use to not like Canelo but now I admit he should be considered number 1 P4P.
                    If you are going just by resume then PacMan should be numero uno

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I got terrence, uysk, ggg, inoue and maybe loma at 5.

                      I think the bigger question is there definitive criteria that a fighter has to meet to become p4p number 1, because I can tell even though boxrec and ring and espn has loma 1 and 2 I cant really put him past 5 or 6 maybe even 7.

                      Some please enlighten me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP