Originally posted by Cadet Bonespurs
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: I'm P4P #1 - Crawford is Second, Canelo is Third
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Tha Kid View PostLoma is delusional...you can't be pound for pound when you lost to a journeyman and got dropped. I swear this overrated dude needs a quick dose of reality...He will get his head taken off if he steps into the ring with Tank Davis
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostHe has accomplished more in his first 14 fights than any other fighter in history. Those are facts that cannot be disputed. Look at how some of these fanboys and casuals are slurping on hype jobs like Tank, Teofomo, and Wilder...what have they accomplished that comes anywhere close to Loma? For all of you who call GGG a bum, what does that say about Canelo who fought him to a draw and got a gift in both fights? How is Canelo #1?
I have Loma and Crawford sharing the #1 P4P spot right now.
Good point on GGG. Everyone here said he's a terrible fighter and a bum, so how did Canelo, after failing two PED tests elevate to being the best fighter based on two fights that the majority feel at best he's 1-1 but most feel he's either 0-1-1 or 0-2 against. Only the fanboys and a few racists think that the 1-0-1 mark is correct.
I think Loma is a clear #1. I believe he's in for a tough fight this weekend but he'll win. Crawford is probably #2 but unfortunately his competition post Postol is bordering on terrible. If he gets all the credit in the world for becoming undisputed then I hope those that did so afford the same praise for Loma when he wins all four belts as it's against better opponents. (Linares, Pedraza, Campbell, Commey/The god Teo winner are ALL better than Indongo and Dulorme. Crawford is my favorite fighter but washed up Khan, the next guy, Benavidez, Horn, Molina and a two fight a year schedule isn't going to cut it. It's not pathetic like Gervonta or Charlo schedule but it's enough to consider Inoue, Usyk ahead of him if you stock resume that much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ceylon mooney View Postthat was salido. not a journeyman. orlando salido was the toughest featherweight at the time. lomachenkos second fight he fought salido. top guys dont face a fighter like that til their 20-something fight. no ones does **** like that these days.
then for his third fight totally outclassed the top featherweight next. most unified champions dont go up against a guy that good well into their title reigns.
only inoue & usyk have a resume that rivals lomachenkos.
loma KOs people tank davis hasnt dared to face. davis has fought ONE salido-quality fighter. lomachenko has outclassed about a dozen of em. he KOs the kind of fighters that are too much for davis.
davis doesnt have a chance against lomachenko. hes got formidable skills and abilities, but he doesnt have a chance against lomachenko.
stick to golf cuz you dont understand boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lomasexual View PostIf your perspective is shaped just by a love of boxing, you will have Loma as #1, or possibly Loma #2 and Crawford as #1.
If your perspective is messed up by race, nationality, devotion to individual fighters etc, then you will come up with any excuse to deny Loma his dues.
Some people on this forum just simply love boxing, and let all the other bullshit go. But plenty of others just wallow in the shit.
Myself? I just love boxing. I don't know how other people could let their biases interfere with their own love of boxing. But I guess assholes are just assholes wherever you go.
Comment
Comment