Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBO Denies Dillian Whyte Appeal, Upholds Usyk Mandatory Ruling

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Califire209 View Post
    Dillian must be going down the Tyson Fury Coke depression clown Road.
    He going to take his horse to the Old Town Road.
    He's going to ride till he can't no more.

    Then he will fall off the horse.

    Comment


    • #32
      Dillian is done he will be suspended for PEDs

      He isn’t popular or have a fan base large enough to put pressure on the boxing organizations.

      He’s not enough of a draw to make the other guys want to risk fighting him.

      At his age he doesn’t have time to rebuild his reputation and standing.

      The rest of his prime will be wasted and he will be a gatekeeper in his old age

      Comment


      • #33
        Like Miller - be glad this cheat didn’t get the title shot. Based on his over the top comments in the ring after the fight - when he knew his guy tested dirty - they expected the story to not get out. Credit Thomas Hauser and this site for the journalism. Go back and listen to Hearn making a WWE style announcement in ring to build support for a Wilder fight. Embarrassing now that we know. Whyte knocked Breazeale as undeserving. Well - he wasn’t on resume. Know what Breazeale is that Whyte isn’t? A clean athlete

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by andocom View Post
          The law for one thing, UKAD follow the WADA rules. They don't announce results until a ruling is made and sanction handed down, same for all WADA signatories UKAD, USADA, ASADA etc.

          BBBoC are only allowed to announce anything after UKAD publish their findings. Whyte isn't talking because its a confidential on going process, for him to come out making public statements while the process is underway would be pretty ******.

          The WBC might actually is a bit of a tight spot here, they have provisionally suspended Whyte based on media reports, but they don't really have a solid reason to at this point, UKAD hasn't provisionally suspended him, and since that process is confidential, as in they won't even acknowledge an investigation is underway until it is completed and he is found to have doped, so basically all the WBC has is passed VADA tests and media reports.

          Until the results from UKAD are known and with no provisional suspension from you could imagine Whyte's claim would be pretty straight forward to WBC etc, why am I suspended, you failed a test, did I where are the results?

          I can definitely see it from the WBC's perspective also, they are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
          The WBC only suspended his status as mandatory challenger and interim champion.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
            The WBC only suspended his status as mandatory challenger and interim champion.
            Obviously, but that has nothing to do with my post, which is about the evidence or lack thereof on which they made that ruling.

            The WBC has said he is provisionally suspended while they investigate, but really they have nothing to investigate, the UKAD results are confidential while the process is ongoing.

            The NADP had a hearing, heard the evidence and didn't impose a provisional suspension. All the WBC have is passed VADA tests and unconfirmed media reports and have provisionally suspended him.

            I do understand the WBC position, it was a bit of a no win situation for them, but from a due process perspective they do appear to be on thin ice.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by alexjust View Post
              To go with an assumption of what one would do without knowing all the facts is a crappy argument. He still might be innocent, but dealing with this behind the curtains and follows the advice of his lawyers to STFU. Given what a loud mouth he is, if I were his lawyer, that would probably be my first recommendation to him. Its very uncharacteristic of Whyte to be so quiet for weeks, perhaps there is a reason?

              Its hard to argue with conspirologist... no matter what you say they will come back with rebuttals they take out of their as$es. Facts, let deal with facts
              Facts are he tested dirty for steroids. What happens next doesnt change that.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by andocom View Post
                Obviously, but that has nothing to do with my post, which is about the evidence or lack thereof on which they made that ruling.

                The WBC has said he is provisionally suspended while they investigate, but really they have nothing to investigate, the UKAD results are confidential while the process is ongoing.

                The NADP had a hearing, heard the evidence and didn't impose a provisional suspension. All the WBC have is passed VADA tests and unconfirmed media reports and have provisionally suspended him.

                I do understand the WBC position, it was a bit of a no win situation for them, but from a due process perspective they do appear to be on thin ice.
                Didn't they ask for all information related to the failed test? What gives you the impression that there is a stone wall between other en****** and the UKAD test results and findings?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
                  Didn't they ask for all information related to the failed test? What gives you the impression that there is a stone wall between other en****** and the UKAD test results and findings?
                  Not sure who you are talking about as boxingscene censored it, but UKAD legally can't provide that info to anyone outside the specified list of people they must inform under their rules, sanctioning bodies aren't on that list, and the groups on that list aren't allowed to provide it to other third parties.

                  They publish it and the sanction only when the process is complete if doping is found.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by joe strong View Post
                    Fury is ranked ahead of Whyte too now..,
                    Exactly. He owes it all to Tom Schwarz

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by alexjust View Post
                      I'm not going to defend Whyte if it is established he voluntarily taken PEDs and it is proven, but at this stage...boys, hold your horses. We know absolutely nothing concrete yet other than the words "adverse finding" and "sample A". Shouldn't we wait for facts and official decision of BBoC come out? Jeez, no wonder the world is full of conspiracy theory nutcases.
                      No we shouldn’t. There’s proof. You said yourself “adverse finding” in “Sample A”

                      He’s guilty.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP