Anthony Joshua exposes Eddie Hearn in "The Untold Truth".

[Marchegiano]

You're an idiot!

Bentt won a title and got knocked out by Herbie after that. When did Bentt ever unify titles?

Are you mentally impaired? AJ UNIFIED twice and had 3 belts after 22 fights.

Fu..ck out of here, man

Yeah, just like how Joshua won his titles before Joe and got KTFO before Joe too huh?

Goddamn son :lo1:

Bentt got that title before AJ got anything. Nothing you can ever do to change that.

Frazier got him a title with in 22 as well...and won his 23...nothing you can do to change that.

No one had the very ultra specific career Joshua had, so yeah, you can continue to say "but at this point it's different because of this" it doesn't mean much other then you're a sniveling little ***** with no sense of self pride or even understanding of what I'm getting you to say about yourself for all to read at their leisure.

Getting titles by 22 just means there was a weak division to take advantage of. Some great ones did it, some weak ones did it, basically all the old'uns did it.

When does John L get his title child? His first boxing match of course. We mark the Queensberry change from when LPRR champion Sullivan became boxing champion Sullivan.

So, yeah circumstantial.

I dunno what the **** what happened to Bentt after he became champion has to do with "AJ got a title in just 22 fights, isn't that praise worthy"....The answer is no. Guys clearly not as good as Joshua who didn't achieve as much got a title before 22 or even 16. How early you get a title is meaningless. I know you know this.

Go on with your funny self now.

[BangEM]

Yeah, just like how Joshua won his titles before Joe and got KTFO before Joe too huh?

Goddamn son :lo1:

Bentt got that title before AJ got anything. Nothing you can ever do to change that.

Frazier got him a title with in 22 as well...and won his 23...nothing you can do to change that.

No one had the very ultra specific career Joshua had, so yeah, you can continue to say "but at this point it's different because of this" it doesn't mean much other then you're a sniveling little ***** with no sense of self pride or even understanding of what I'm getting you to say about yourself for all to read at their leisure.

Getting titles by 22 just means there was a weak division to take advantage of. Some great ones did it, some weak ones did it, basically all the old'uns did it.

When does John L get his title child? His first boxing match of course. We mark the Queensberry change from when LPRR champion Sullivan became boxing champion Sullivan.

So, yeah circumstantial.

I dunno what the **** what happened to Bentt after he became champion has to do with "AJ got a title in just 22 fights, isn't that praise worthy"....The answer is no. Guys clearly not as good as Joshua who didn't achieve as much got a title before 22 or even 16. How early you get a title is meaningless. I know you know this.

Go on with your funny self now.

Dumb fat yank, it's now obvious that reading isn't your forte.

This is the original question again:

Name 5 other heavyweights in the history of boxing that have a better resume with tough fights after tough fights like AJ after 22 fights?

Is that too difficult to read and comprehend?

[redmish]

I didnt read all of your post but it's simple, any fighter who wants to be the best HW in the world should be beating Ruiz. Ruiz is a good fighter and deserved the victory but if AJ loses the rematch, he has a decision to make about his future in the sport.