Comments Thread For: Yarde: I Have Tunnel Vision - To Knock Sergey Kovalev Out!

[apollocreed]

He's looking for someone to bite and respond to his provocations. There is a lot of sad posters on here who live off the little attention they get on here. Do yourself a favour and put the dumb yank on ignore...

On topic, I really hope Kov knocks this guy out. I personally cant stand Yarde, he's ****y without actually doing anything yet in his career

Same mate. I'm British but I don't blindly back all Brit fighters because of patriotism. I never used to like Kovalev at all, I thought he was a bully lacking heart and loved it when Ward stopped him.
He's proven he's world class though, I thought he was done when Alvarez beat him but you have to give him credit for winning the rematch at his advanced age.

Yarde I think is living in a bubble of delusion, mainly due to Tunde Ajayi constantly feeding him a load of bull****.
I think the first time he feels Kovalev's power it will be a big shock. He isn't seasoned at all and hasn't beat one world level name before stepping up.

[apollocreed]

What? Lol. I have to prove that you have boxing knowledge? Your kidding me, right?

After reading this, I have to point out that the burden of proof is with you. You made the initial accusation that he doesn't know what he's talking about - it's up to you to then provide evidence to back up your claim. The burden of proof is with the accuser, not the accused. Pretty simple premise.

For example I believe Joshua is most likely a PED cheat, but I don't have proof. The burden of proof would be on me to back up any claims I made, so I can't really say anything unless proof becomes known.

[Alan Smithee]

After reading this, I have to point out that the burden of proof is with you. You made the initial accusation that he doesn't know what he's talking about - it's up to you to then provide evidence to back up your claim. The burden of proof is with the accuser, not the accused. Pretty simple premise.

For example I believe Joshua is most likely a PED cheat, but I don't have proof. The burden of proof would be on me to back up any claims I made, so I can't really say anything unless proof becomes known.

Pretty simple premise? If an individualy considers himself an "expert" in a certain field or on a particular topic is it not his responsibility to prove his worth if someone questions him?. I am a nuclear physicist! If you question that claim should I be responsible to supply some proof. Or do you have to prove that I am not? As for Sid he has been proven consistently wrong on a number of occasions. I was just asking for one instance where he was correct!

[LetOutTheCage]

Same mate. I'm British but I don't blindly back all Brit fighters because of patriotism. I never used to like Kovalev at all, I thought he was a bully lacking heart and loved it when Ward stopped him.
He's proven he's world class though, I thought he was done when Alvarez beat him but you have to give him credit for winning the rematch at his advanced age.

Yarde I think is living in a bubble of delusion, mainly due to Tunde Ajayi constantly feeding him a load of bull****.
I think the first time he feels Kovalev's power it will be a big shock. He isn't seasoned at all and hasn't beat one world level name before stepping up.

Yeah I think that's the thing here, he's not fought anywhere near that level before. I remember seeing him struggling in of his fights (think it was against Sjekloca) I just remember not being impressed by Yarde despite his arrogant persona. He ultimately got his opponent out there but it was hard work for him.

Kovalev will be the best boxer he has fought by far and the hardest puncher as well.

[sicko]

Just go to the BODY and he will fall apart

He is going to cry to the ref that punches are low when they're not so that he can get the ref to disrupt your body work

Get inside and break him down to the body

[apollocreed]

Pretty simple premise? If an individualy considers himself an "expert" in a certain field or on a particular topic is it not his responsibility to prove his worth if someone questions him?. I am a nuclear physicist! If you question that claim should I be responsible to supply some proof. Or do you have to prove that I am not? As for Sid he has been proven consistently wrong on a number of occasions. I was just asking for one instance where he was correct!

Yes it is a simple premise, and it should be for you in that case.
If you accuse someone of something, be it being a murderer, thief, PED cheat or in this case, not knowing anything about boxing lol, you have it back it up with proof.
That's why it's called the 'burden of proof' - the burden is with the accuser.
You accused him of knowing noting about boxing - therefore you have to back that up with evidence.
It's not his responsibility if the accuser doesn't have proof.

[Alan Smithee]

Yes it is a simple premise, and it should be for you in that case.
If you accuse someone of something, be it being a murderer, thief, PED cheat or in this case, not knowing anything about boxing lol, you have it back it up with proof.
That's why it's called the 'burden of proof' - the burden is with the accuser.
You accused him of knowing noting about boxing - therefore you have to back that up with evidence.
It's not his responsibility if the accuser doesn't have proof.

Did you fail to read the following quote?


"As for Sid he has been proven consistently wrong on a number of occasions".


His posts themselves provide the proof. Do you follow this guy? This kind of sounds like I am talking to Sid-Knee himself. Interesting!

[HeadBodyBodyBody]

Will Yarde use the shoulder-roll? I can't see that going well for him

[apollocreed]

Did you fail to read the following quote?


"As for Sid he has been proven consistently wrong on a number of occasions".


His posts themselves provide the proof. Do you follow this guy? This kind of sounds like I am talking to Sid-Knee himself. Interesting!

Lol I'm not him dude. I was just reading through the thread and I had to point that out to you - if you're the one accusing someone of something, it's your job to back it up with proof.
You can't say to someone 'prove to me you're not a ****head'.

You say 'you're a ****head - here's why' and have an example ready.
Like I said it's a very simple pillar of law and order.

[Alan Smithee]

Lol I'm not him dude. I was just reading through the thread and I had to point that out to you - if you're the one accusing someone of something, it's your job to back it up with proof.
You can't say to someone 'prove to me you're not a ****head'.

You say 'you're a ****head - here's why' and have an example ready.
Like I said it's a very simple pillar of law and order.

I have proven to this guy time and time again how off base he is! There were dozens of examples provided. I'm not wasting my time again. I actually shouldn't have bothered before either. There is plenty of proof that he doesn't know what he is talking about. I asked him to provide an example where he does. If that is beyond your comprehension then..........