Max Kellerman: Manny Pacquiao has a case for the best pound-for-pound fighter ever

[creekrat77]

Max just triggered an entire legion of fanboys.

Come and watch how Flowmows will defend Floyd to death with insults and emotion in this thread . Stay tuned folks after these messages!

You're right, ffs these people are so triggered

[john l]

Max is a fkn idiot

way to torpedo your own credibility

FACT: if Armstrong fought in a era that had 100+ world "titles", and 17 different divisions..... rather than a era with 8 world champions, and 8 divisions..... he would have truckloads of the rubbish that Max calls "achievements"

Max is being a fanboy fool..... which is a little disappointing

now, NONE of the (in)famous HBO 3..... have any remaining credibility

Amen I used to like Max before he went to HBO, now he is just biased idiot.

[alexnation]

lol so much hate here

[pasawayako]

Pac could have been 10 division champ. Mind boggling

8 div champion is already out of this world how much more if he's 10 div champion? I think everyday all this hater will talk about how pac was using peds since birth. lmao

[aboutfkntime]

let's see if you can back up that thing you call "FACT"

armstrong was a champion at 126-147...let's say we give him the ceferino garcia too at mw so 126-160...that's 7 divisions in today's standards, 1 division short compared to manny ..and if we go by official record, armstronng was still 3 divisions short (as a champion) compared to manny in today's standards...that's with pac skipping a couple weightclasses too btw

also, what do you think is the biggest weight difference between armstrong and his opponents?

so easy to throw garbage in and callin it "fact" but backing it up is the hard part huh lol

FACT: there is only one criteria for greatness

WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how

paper titles mean absolutely nothing, because.....

FACT: if Armstrong fought in a era that had 100+ world "titles", and 17 different divisions..... rather than a era with 8 world champions, and 8 divisions..... he would have truckloads of the rubbish that Max calls "achievements"

which is why Mayweather is CLEARLY greater than Pacquiao

Pac has anonymous paper " titles "..... Mayweather has names

" margarito "
" David Diaz "
" Chris Algieri "
" Thurman "

whoop-de-shlt

[aboutfkntime]

accomplishments speak for itself.

- first and only 8 weight world champion
- first and only 5 weight lineal champion
- the third fighter in history to win 3 lineal titles in 3 of the 8 original weight classes
- first and only 4 time welterweight champion in history
- oldest welterweight champion in history
- only second boxer in history to win world titles 20 years apart
- by next year pacquiao will be the first and only boxer to hold world titles in 4 different decade - 90s, 00s, 10s, and 20s
- 3x fighter of the year and fotd

again, not one of those " achievements " are a genuine criteria for greatness

none of that rubbish existed back when many of the greats were king

NAMES !!

who did you beat, with consideration given to when/how

nothing else matters

btw, being a 4-time welterweight champion means you lost at least 3x LMAO..... you are literally giving Pac credit for losing, which is the only thing that he actually did better than Mayweather

[aboutfkntime]

..... you are LITERALLY giving Pac credit for losing, which is the only thing that he actually did better than Mayweather

[OCPancho]

again, not one of those " achievements " are a genuine criteria for greatness

none of that rubbish existed back when many of the greats were king

NAMES !!

who did you beat, with consideration given to when/how

nothing else matters

btw, being a 4-time welterweight champion means you lost at least 3x LMAO..... you are literally giving Pac credit for losing, which is the only thing that he actually did better than Mayweather

Sugar Ray was given credit for being a 5-time middle champion.
Ali being the first heavyweight champion to win the title 3 times.
Floyd Patterson being the first heavyweight to regain the title .

Pac had huge KO wins as an underdog .
Floyd ?

[OCPancho]

Max now a new set of haters . lol

[aboutfkntime]

who did you beat, with consideration given to when/how ?

Mayweather has more better/high-level wins than Pacquiao

+

Mayweather did not lose to MULTIPLE fighters, some by KO

+

Mayweather beat Pacquiao

+

NO, it has nothing to do with size..... Mayweather and Pacquiao were both established welters when they fought..... Pac could never solve the Marquez puzzle, losing every fight according to some observers..... but Mayweather schooled Marquez easily

Mayweather > Pacquiao..... not even close