Comments Thread For: 30-Day Weights: Lomachenko 144.5, Campbell 147.4

[StargazerV]

Who did tank just fight?

The best available nobody, sir!

[alexjust]

This is how 147lb fighters should weigh 30 days before the fight. Not 160 in the ring. Weight classes is a legalized fraud.

[_original_]

We apologize that not every opponent can be undefeated. We know this day and age it is hard for many to grasp that fighters do sometimes lose and rebound. I mean Spence is going to fight a guy who lost to guy he already beat also. Pure Blasphemy!

That all maybe true but it doesn't change the fact that this is such an uninteresting fight. Speaks a lot about how good Lomachenko is if you will, but the fight is just another showcase for him.

[Slowhand]

Loma still looks a bit soft, Campbell already looks dry..

[CaptainWalrus]

Campbell is ranked #1 by the WBC, and #2 by Ring Magazine.

Who would you prefer he fight that’s better?

I think he wants Loma to move up to light-heavyweight where the division is stacked.

[CaptainWalrus]

Loma is special. If great trainers and fighters are saying this, then maybe it's true!

[_Rexy_]

Loma still looks a bit soft, Campbell already looks dry..

Not surprising. Loma looks like he rehydrates up to 140 on fight night.

[pasawayako]

This is how 147lb fighters should weigh 30 days before the fight. Not 160 in the ring. Weight classes is a legalized fraud.

Pac weight around 147lbs or less in 30 day weigh in.

[Ake-Dawg]

For a vacant title.

Would you prefer it if he said “naw **** that” and fought Lopez? Lopez is undefeated but would lose to Campbell and just got exposed by a Japanese boxer nobody has ever heard of.

I wouldn't say all that. You're giving Campbell a lot of credit here. Also, what did the Japanese boxer expose?

[_Rexy_]

I wouldn't say all that. You're giving Campbell a lot of credit here. Also, what did the Japanese boxer expose?

Am I the type of poster to needlessly give credit to an English boxer?

Exposed a few things, power, controlling the range, mental fortitude, etc.