Another "Fighter of the Decade Award" for Manny Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
-
Not a chance. I'm thinking it has to be Canelo or Mayweather.
The reason I was convinced Pac was going to choose Spence or Crawford was because I thought he would want to push for FOTD again. Choosing Thurman did nothing to bolster his claim at all. And since I think he mentioned not fighting again this year, it's a wrap for his chances.Comment
-
This is what you call a dishonest post. The kind of post where you know the poster doesnt believe a word theyre saying.Not a chance. I'm thinking it has to be Canelo or Mayweather.
The reason I was convinced Pac was going to choose Spence or Crawford was because I thought he would want to push for FOTD again. Choosing Thurman did nothing to bolster his claim at all. And since I think he mentioned not fighting again this year, it's a wrap for his chances.Comment
-
Ohhh, really? That's ironic coming from you.
Go ahead and pick it apart. And when Pac doesn't come close to sniffing this award, I'll be sure to remind you of your idiocy.Comment
-
Speaking of Thomas Hauser...

Manny Pacquiao entered the decade as the hottest property in boxing with devastating knockouts of Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton and Miguel Cotto in his previous three fights. But Pacquiao's record in the current decade (11-4, 1 KO) falls short of the mark. Two of the four blemishes on his record during the past 10 years came on questionable decisions. But Pacquiao was outclassed by Floyd Mayweather Jr. and starched by Juan Manuel Marquez. And none of his victories since Jan. 1, 2010, were notable. He doesn't make the final ballot.
If anyone thinks Thurman makes the difference from Pac being completely out of the running to being a likely winner, you are beyond delusional.Comment
-
no.. if pac wants to win FOTD then thurman was the best guy to do that. fighting spence/crawford will only please the floyd fans on here.Not a chance. I'm thinking it has to be Canelo or Mayweather.
The reason I was convinced Pac was going to choose Spence or Crawford was because I thought he would want to push for FOTD again. Choosing Thurman did nothing to bolster his claim at all. And since I think he mentioned not fighting again this year, it's a wrap for his chances.
notice i said floyd fans and not all the fans on here because that's about the only fan base that keeps calling for this match up.
but the truth is, if manny wins, then we all know that spence and crawford will all of a sudden, become, "unproven". which is the truth. but it'll take a pac win over those 2 guys for yall to admit it.
manny back2back FOTD is coming, like it or not, yall just gon have to live with it.
Comment
-
Bro, you are back in full trolling mode I see.no.. if pac wants to win FOTD then thurman was the best guy to do that. fighting spence/crawford will only please the floyd fans on here.
notice i said floyd fans and not all the fans on here because that's about the only fan base that keeps calling for this match up.
but the truth is, if manny wins, then we all know that spence and crawford will all of a sudden, become, "unproven". which is the truth. but it'll take a pac win over those 2 guys for yall to admit it.
manny back2back FOTD is coming, like it or not, yall just gon have to live with it.
You can honestly say that beating Spence or Crawford would have been less of an accomplishment than beating Thurman?
Is that really what you're saying?Comment
-
?
why?
floyd made him go seek saltwater for his fake shoulder injury
imo pacquiao barely won 4 rounds... barelyComment
-
[IMG]https://i.*****.com/media/q16p1pmfu5aZW/*****.webp[/IMG]The "article" which is more like an opinion piece, says Manny vs Thurman was expected to breach the 800k ppv mark.
Says Pacquiao was knocked out by a lucky hail mary punch and was hobbled by the shoulder injury vs Mayweather.
When you end the article with
Let us pray for a back to back "Fighter of the Decade Award" for our 'Pambansang Kamao'.
You know that shit is super biased.Comment
-
Well Pac has beaten many, great fighters in 2010 til now. Should Nelo get it for losing to GGG and beating him once, GGG is overated most say. Should beating khan get Nelo it?
SRR wouldn't beat Thurman at 40 so why are you sarcastically saying Thurman....nah? And if SRR could or woulda he hasn't got the evidence to prove it!
when did canelo lose to lilg?
first fight I had it a draw or canelo 7-5 (which was close) and canelo literally made lilg his biatch making ggg back up for more than 80% of the fightComment

Comment