Another "Fighter of the Decade Award" for Manny Pacquiao?

[Left Hook Tua]

welterweight

He won lineal at 147?

I know not ring mag lineal

Whose lineal? For what fight?

[IronDanHamza]

canelo failed a ped test, loss to floyd, then got a draw in the most important fight of his career at the time which most thought he loss then got a win in the same fight in which most thought he loss too!

floyd on the other hand, hasnt been active since 2015!! the award should be between the TOP active fighters. if you can pick out the flaws on pac which you feel he shouldnt be consider to win FOTD, then you have to do the same for the fighters that you're bringing up saying they deserve it!!! because those fighters are even far behind manny.

I don’t know who’s going to win it. No one stands out.

But I do know Pacquaio has no chance.

[IronDanHamza]

He won lineal at 147?

I know not ring mag lineal

Whose lineal? For what fight?

They say for Bradley even though Bradley was coming off a loss and a draw.

Makes no sense.

Not Lineal at 147 in my eyes. Makes no sense.

[Divine Hammer]

He won lineal at 147?

I know not ring mag lineal

Whose lineal? For what fight?

the very well respected transnational boxing rankings board which consists of over 50 prestigious well decorated boxing journalists and historians. so over 50 great boxing minds rightfully awarded PAC lineal welterweight in 2016 for beating #2 ranked bradley who was coming off three impressive wins(chaves fight should have been a win).this is completely factual.

[hugh grant]

whats ur justification for a retired boxer (for more than 5 years) to receive fotd??? what is ur justification for canelo who failed drug tests, won numerous controversial decisions, stripped of his belts multiple times, struggled against guys pac beat up badly to win fotd???

Pac haters like to pretend to think Pac would struggle with fighters their favourite fighters beat.
But when Pac actually fights common opponents he beats them more dominantly.
Why natural super middleweight nel o couldn't stop old man ssm is anyone's guess.

[Roadblock]

Pac haters like to pretend to think Pac would struggle with fighters their favourite fighters beat.
But when Pac actually fights common opponents he beats them more dominantly.
Why natural super middleweight nel o couldn't stop old man ssm is anyone's guess.

You dreaming again you braindead moron.

Manny = 145 Oscar 145 Cotto and Coke habit Hatton, iced by JMM.

Floyd = 163 Oscar 154 Cotto, prime undefeated Hatton and schooled JMM like an amatuer.

Add beating Canelo and Manny and there is no way Manny competes with Floyd .

Post their resume from 2010 till now lol.

[hugh grant]

You dreaming again you braindead moron.

Manny = 145 Oscar 145 Cotto and Coke habit Hatton, iced by JMM.

Floyd = 163 Oscar 154 Cotto, prime undefeated Hatton and schooled JMM like an amatuer.

Add beating Canelo and Manny and there is no way Manny competes with Floyd .

Post their resume from 2010 till now lol.

Pac beating thurman at 40 proves he can do things Floyd cant, so him beating all common opponents more dominant than Floyd is no surprise in hindsight and no accident.
Most people don't think like you thank God, and most people can conclude that Pac continually surprised people doing things they didn't think he was capable of.
After beating everyone more dominant than floyd, nobody would put it past Pac beating thurman. Pac was favourite. He wasn't favourite against thurman as people thought he cheated to beat hatton, dlh and cotto more dominant than floyd ever could

[Left Hook Tua]

the very well respected transnational boxing rankings board which consists of over 50 prestigious well decorated boxing journalists and historians. so over 50 great boxing minds rightfully awarded PAC lineal welterweight in 2016 for beating #2 ranked bradley who was coming off three impressive wins(chaves fight should have been a win).this is completely factual.

Didnt know he won "lineal" at 147

I don't know if that's deserved

Especially since Bradley wasn't even a legit 147 guy

Bradley was a career 140 guy

I don't even remember him beating a single real 147 guy

[Left Hook Tua]

They say for Bradley even though Bradley was coming off a loss and a draw.

Makes no sense.

Not Lineal at 147 in my eyes. Makes no sense.

Only way is if theres no lineal and pac and Bradley was clear #1 and #2

Maybe pac was #1, #2 at 147

I dont remember Bradley being one at same time of pac fight

[Curtis Harper]

hahahahahahahahaah ur a joke. wowo

I'm not the one being delusional enough to say Pacquiao never has a great win until Thurman.

Those kind of statements are the type that would classify as ignorant.

Name names. Don't be scared