Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Suspends Dillian Whyte's Position as Interim-Champ, Mandatory

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by KTFOKING View Post
    It really is nothing more than a temporarily suspension unless Whyte's B sample ends up being dirty as well. Granted, B samples are usually the same as the A samples but we have seen in some cases that not be the case.

    The WBC pretty much had no choice but to do this as of now.
    B sample really doesn't matter he shouldn't have dianabol in his system to begin with it's illegal

    Comment


    • #82
      Several points:

      Whyte, if found guilty, should be banned indefinitely. Also, everyone responsible for withholding information prior to the fight should be fined. The bout with Rivaz should be null and void because of the circumstances surrounding the fight.

      And lastly, why does it take so long to verify the "B" sample?
      This whole thing is suspect as hell and gives reason to not trust anyone involved with the testing. What? Are they waiting to see how much $$$ they can get from Hearns and Matchroom, or are they trying hard to come up with a reason, to say that the "B" sample is inconclusive.

      This sucks big time.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
        This is all working out so well for Ducksquad Deyonce.

        It's all just a coincidence I'm sure.
        Same way all the cheating and fighting in the UK almost worked out for Shyte. Too bad he got caught. Even though the UK commission doesnt frown upon cheating???

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
          This is all working out so well for Ducksquad Deyonce.

          It's all just a coincidence I'm sure.
          Pathetic shill. Others fail a test but it's Wilder's fault or to Wilder's benefit. LoLoL! If it's that stacked for him why bother mate? It's a lost cause trying to resist.

          The irony is that Wilder has been saying for the longest that a lot of these guys are sneaking PEDS. The sport is gonna have to go to a one-strike rule. Flunk a test and you're out, preiod.

          PS - Remember you were crowing that Breazeale would upset Wilder? I told you then that AJ was vulnerable (fighting Miller, but ...). Anyway, surprise, surprise ... look who got upset .... and who didn't. I understand you're butthurt to the point of insanity now ...

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by pollywog View Post
            Its always about the B sample.

            Don't see why they couldn't wait til the test result for that comes through.

            If it's clear then all this brouhaha will have been for nought!
            did they even do one?

            I remeber heard saying he had a choice to have a hearing or have the b sample? So did the hearing happen instead of a b sample?

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by arraamis View Post
              Several points:

              Whyte, if found guilty, should be banned indefinitely. Also, everyone responsible for withholding information prior to the fight should be fined. The bout with Rivaz should be null and void because of the circumstances surrounding the fight.

              And lastly, why does it take so long to verify the "B" sample?
              This whole thing is suspect as hell and gives reason to not trust anyone involved with the testing. What? Are they waiting to see how much $$$ they can get from Hearns and Matchroom, or are they trying hard to come up with a reason, to say that the "B" sample is inconclusive.

              This sucks big time.

              According to the UKAD rules a fighter has up to 10 days to request the "B" sample be tested in his presence or the presence of a witness of his choosing. We should know the results very soon!

              Comment


              • #87
                Deserved if B sample comes through. Why does it take so long to test a urine sample??? Its 2019.

                If Whyte is guilty that Rivas fight should be a no contest.

                Whyte (if guilty), Fury, Miller, Canelo all need to be labelled as drug cheats

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Brettcappe View Post
                  According to the UKAD rules a fighter has up to 10 days to request the "B" sample be tested in his presence or the presence of a witness of his choosing. We should know the results very soon!
                  I hope so, because the longer this drags out, the more suspect it becomes. And I honestly don't trust Hearn in this regard, because they kept everything under cover and allowed the fight with Rivas to go on without informing anyone of the test results until after the fight.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff View Post
                    There is still the problem that Team Rivas had the right to know about
                    the dirty a-sample, and then there's also the glove controversy which
                    is not even mentioned here.
                    Yep, the real problem and subterfuge is that Team hearn/BBBofC/Whyte wasn't forthcoming to Team Rivas and the WBC. How can any fighter, promoter, or sanctioning body trust these guys to be professionals, and do the right thing going forward?

                    If this turns out as bad as it looks I wouldn't deal with these dudes. No morals, no ethics, no sense of professional propriety. They would have zero trust levels as professional bocing officials ...

                    Switched the agreed upon gloves? And the management Team went along with it? With no notice?

                    Next would be not honoring financial commitments and other agreements. Where there's smoke ...

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by SchoolTheseCats View Post
                      Fight was allowed to proceed because of bbboc policy of innocent until all samples are tested and investigation is over if he would of been caught with at least two weeks to go before fight instead of 3 days could of got results back from b sample and fight would of been canceled
                      I still don't get it...u mean they knowingly put the life of another fighter in danger, all because of a policy
                      Why wasn't the fight suspended until they had enough evidence

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP