Why didn’t Miller get to fight Joshua?

[johnbook]

The reason why is like when Carlito Brigante said to Benny Blanco from The Bronx:
"I've been with made guys. Who've you been with? Jive Ass maricon mfers..."

.

[Eff Pandas]

The NYSAC should have approved him and had a hearing on his failed test after the fight.

It’s none of Joshua’s business anyway, it’s confidential information. And innocent until proven otherwise too.

UK is on some backwoods hillbilly sh^t bruh.

Big Baby shoulda went to the UK to fight Joshua & he'd been fine. Sh^t UK commission mighta offered him some more banned substances. They cool with that sh^t.

[andocom]

Actually you are deflecting and hoping for the hail mary with a chain of custody dispute. And you clearly don't understand the the way samples are made. Whatever is in A sample, is in B sample. If someone, say the blood drawer was going to spike the samples, since you know they have full access to it both samples. Would they only spike one sample? The phlebotomistis righter there yea? They'd just spike everything, one sample split it in two numbnuts. Lmao, I don't even know the machinations in a delusional like yours would conceive. Since we're going on this lala land dream walk lol.

My understanding is that the B sample isn't only for chain of custody disputes, although that is one instance where they can be used. Also when testing for very small amounts of compounds which are not uniformly distributed throughout the sample it is possible that an A or B sample could reach a detectible threshold while the other didn't, that would be pretty rare though. In some juristrictions atheletes or their reps can be present at the testing of the B sample whereas they can't for the A sample, no idea if this is the case here though.

Probably a 99% chance the B sample will come back with similar readings as the A.

[LetOutTheCage]

Actually you are deflecting and hoping for the hail mary with a chain of custody dispute. And you clearly don't understand the the way samples are made. Whatever is in A sample, is in B sample. If someone, say the blood drawer was going to spike the samples, since you know they have full access to it both samples. Would they only spike one sample? The phlebotomistis righter there yea? They'd just spike everything, one sample split it in two numbnuts. Lmao, I don't even know the machinations in a delusional like yours would conceive. Since we're going on this lala land dream walk lol.

You cant honestly be this ****** surely? Then again the fact that you dont seem to understand what I ha e said already suggests that you are.

[thesmokingman]

My understanding is that the B sample isn't only for chain of custody disputes, although that is one instance where they can be used. Also when testing for very small amounts of compounds which are not uniformly distributed throughout the sample it is possible that an A or B sample could reach a detectible threshold while the other didn't, that would be pretty rare though. In some juristrictions atheletes or their reps can be present at the testing of the B sample whereas they can't for the A sample, no idea if this is the case here though.

Probably a 99% chance the B sample will come back with similar readings as the A.

Anything that has threshold levels that low that it's inconsistent to that degree is highly unlikely. I'm not sure I remember a case liek that.

[GGG Gloveking]

At least Ruiz knows now he can go eat the special Snickers and not have to worry about it

[KingKrypton]

Cause Eddie Hearn is a b i t c h. Slime ball let Rivas fight without a notice, b i t c h a s s.

[champion4ever]

Yeah, when Miller popped VADA put him on blast but when Whyte popped UKAD covered it up. It seems that everything is done ass backwards in the U.K.