Cover up!! Whyte met with Anti-doping board just HOURS before fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigjavi973
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2013
    • 24007
    • 759
    • 1,480
    • 1,236,071

    #41
    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
    That means VADA is ****. Passing VADA means **** all.
    that is YOUR opinion.....

    too bad no one cares about what you think. No one is talking about USA vs UK testing etc

    you never even mentioned it until your hero whyte failed his ped test with TWO PEDs in his system

    Comment

    • 2ndroundko
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2006
      • 877
      • 35
      • 21
      • 25,687

      #42
      Originally posted by bigjavi973
      hes trying desperately to make it seems like its somehow the USA's fault that whyte failed a ped in the UK



      ive never seen anyone whine and complain so much.
      u need to stop talking to him. he's trolling you and your ruining a good conversation by constantly quoting him.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #43
        Originally posted by bigjavi973
        nobody brought up US testing....

        YOU are the one who did!


        everyone else here keeps saying the same thing:

        "wow whyte failed a ped test and had two different peds in his system. what a shame"


        out of nowhere you come out:
        "Well he passed VADA in the USA. So UK testing > US testing"







        you dont see how dumb you look here dont ya?
        So you're pretending not to see all the posts saying Ruiz shouldn't fight in the UK? Clown

        Comment

        • champion4ever
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2007
          • 23918
          • 4,090
          • 7,167
          • 202,915,785

          #44
          Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
          I have no problem with due process and he should not be suspended until he's had his due process.

          The problem is they aren't required to notify anyone. Rivas should've been notified and made the decision to fight or not. The WBC should've been notified so they can decide if they want to sanction the fight or not. While Hearn may not have been legally obligated to notify people but it's the morally right thing to do

          But he was trying to use the system in place to string this along and cover it up for at least a year. Hearn is morally bankrupt
          No question; You are absolutely right. All parties should have been notified about this matter and for Eddie Hearn to conceal this information as the lead promoter was both repugnant and disgusting!

          Comment

          • Beterbiev#1
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jul 2019
            • 231
            • 13
            • 8
            • 13,586

            #45
            Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
            Cover up at the highest level of British boxing. Nobody outside of Hearn was notified. Not the WBC. Not VADA. And most importantly not his opponent. No American should fight in the UK until this system is changed. British boxing is withholding positive drug tests from opponents. AJ can knock Ruiz into next week while being juiced up and Ruiz wouldn't know until YEARS later.

            Chill, it's happen in America also.

            It was a GBP card. I forget who it was. It was Quillin, Peterson or somebody, but they withheld the positive test.

            Comment

            • Grimgash
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 2625
              • 108
              • 32
              • 15,477

              #46
              Originally posted by Beterbiev#1
              Chill, it's happen in America also.

              It was a GBP card. I forget who it was. It was Quillin, Peterson or somebody, but they withheld the positive test.
              Yeah but it also happened with Fury not that long ago either... and it's their policy to not tell anyone... that's the issue. You can have an outlier but when you actual policy is wait and see.... that's not good.

              Comment

              • andocom
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2018
                • 1115
                • 145
                • 64
                • 20,088

                #47
                It appears a failled test does trigger an immediate provisional suspension, but I could be wrong.

                It looks like what happened was Whyte had a hearing with the National Anti Doping panel and had his provisional suspension lifted for some reason, if that is the case there better be a pretty good reason. The thing is NADP is independant of UKAD and definitely independant BBBoC, I just can't see them lifting a provisional suspension without some justification, at least more than "come on son, we have sold quite a few tickets".

                So if NADP lift any provisional suspension, there would be no reason for the BBBoC to not sanction the fight, no reason for them to notify Rivas/WBC and in fact it may well be illegal for them to do so on privacy or procedural grounds.

                Looks like it is going to come down to why NADP allowed the provisional suspension to be lifted, its going to be interesting.

                Comment

                • MeanestNiceGuy
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 4558
                  • 1,060
                  • 1,754
                  • 32,266

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Granath
                  Same old, same old when it comes to the Brits. This is the same group that swept Tyson Fury's positive drug tests under the rug for 15 months until he went into rehab. Then it became convenient to retroactively suspend him for two years.

                  The BBBC is as corrupt an organization as there is in boxing. And that's saying something.
                  I'm not even sure why I'm surprised. I thought the BBBC was pretty solid, but it doesn't seem that way nowadays.

                  I'm reading about Whyte's glove situation before the fight and it's just as sickening. Smh

                  Comment

                  • siablo14
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 39750
                    • 2,677
                    • 12,716
                    • 2,257,607

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    That means VADA is ****. Passing VADA means **** all.
                    Good point. VADA looking suspect.

                    Comment

                    • RoyJonesJrp4pno1
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2005
                      • 4617
                      • 113
                      • 4
                      • 39,642

                      #50
                      Originally posted by MeanestNiceGuy
                      Sad. Just ban his ass!

                      Though VADA did their jobs with the test results, ultimately, they don't decide whether the fight moves on or gets canceled.

                      The British Boxing Board's handling of this situation is deplorable, at best.
                      According to Hauser it was UKAD that found the positive test, it wasn't VADA.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP