Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

[SchoolTheseCats]

The Chairman of UKAD and 2 of his top aides left the organisation before the settlement with Team Fury was reached, after being criticised in Parliament for not following correct procedure after positive test results.

Ukad protocols are absolute *****, they shouldn’t allow a boxer to continue to fight pending they investigation being complete which can take up to over a year as they have listed on website.... It covers they azz and makes them more reputable

[kafkod]

Yes, or have an uncle-coach with enough crime money to threaten to bankrupt UKAD and the BBBC with legal fees and proceedings . . . .

The idea that Peter Fury is the British El Chapo is fucking absurd!

He was a minor league gangster who served time for his crimes and turned his life around by legal means after release.

UKAD admitted themselves that they did not follow their own rules in the Fury case and that is the reason why they made a deal with Fury to avoid being sued.

[Roberto Vasquez]

Anybody defending yourself or this guy and the U.K. process which has seen multiple failed tested fighters fail and still fight such as Fury and his cousin are a disgrace, defending the UKAD and the BBBoC you’re as bad as them and the boxers in question.

I can only say you’re not real boxing supporters.

Yeah exactly. I was a big Whyte fan but if his B sample is positive he's just another drug cheater bum to me. AJ better not test postive or I'll be fanboy-ing David Price soon

Everyone should be hounding these people - Fury, Miller etc. Its the fans who let them get away with it - that just make boxers think "Oh Miller came back after his 'ban' and won this or that fight, and people still pay to see him fight, it's not the end of the world if I get caught". Look at Fury - drug-cheat boxer fighting nobodies paraded about like he's the greatest fighter ever

[Roberto Vasquez]

Ukad protocols are absolute *****, they shouldn’t allow a boxer to continue to fight pending they investigation being complete which can take up to over a year as they have listed on website.... It covers they azz and makes them more reputable

You can't really crticise one organisation when the whole of boxing is f**ked. If the whole sport got it's act together, then yes rip apart UKad but you got boxers not even signed up drug-testing in the sport. You got the WBC, WBA etc making up mickey-mouse titles and ripping fans off just to make more money by having more 'championship' fights.

The whole thing is a mess but it will never change as long as people pay to watch drug-cheat boxers fight for made-up titles.

[SchoolTheseCats]

... you made my day, kid... so: VADA (which is responsible for the WBC "clean bioxing program) actually has to "be notified" by other bodies in order to duly perform it's duly job... no, kid: VADA had to do it's own contarctual job, and not to wait to be notified by some passers-by... WTF???...

I don’t think you are understand grandpa...... HE DIDNT FAIL A VADA TEST, IT WAS A TEST ADMINISTRATED BY A UKAD TESTER MEANING VADA WOULDNT KNOW ABOUT FAILED TEST UNLESS THEY WAS NOTIFIED BY UKAD/MATCHROOM......

HE CAME BACK CLEAN FOR VADA TESTING AND TOOK SOMETHING AFTER THEY PED TEST WAS ADMINISTRATED, UKAD TESTED HIM WITHIN A SHORT TIME PERIOD OF HIM TAKING WHATEVER IT WAS HE CAME BACK POSITIVE FOR.....

VADA/UKAD DO SEPARATE TESTING DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW OR STILL THINK THEY BOTH TESTING AT SAMETIME?

[Bronx2245]

We have seen fights go through when a fighter tests positive before a fight, but his opponent and their team is always notified. This is different where Hearn was aware of the positive test as well as the rest of the team, but Rivas team was not. He definitely has a case for a lawsuit.

You're on point! Rivas needs a "no contest" decision from the WBC, and a FAT check from Eddie Hearn!

[mrgreenfingers]

This kills two birds with one stone it gets wilder out of the whyte fight and also gives Ruiz a good reason not to fight Joshua in England.

[kafkod]

Never a good sign when parliament gets involved lol

Most definitely. It was only after Tyson Fury was criticised by a Member of Parliament that somebody within UKAD "remembered" he had failed a PED test 15 months previously.

[_Rexy_]

The idea that Peter Fury is the British El Chapo is fucking absurd!

He was a minor league gangster who served time for his crimes and turned his life around by legal means after release.

UKAD admitted themselves that they did not follow their own rules in the Fury case and that is the reason why they made a deal with Fury to avoid being sued.

LMFAO is that the rumour over there? that Big John is a mob boss??


EDIT - Wait, it's Peter Fury? Damn that's even better!

[SchoolTheseCats]

You can't really crticise one organisation when the whole of boxing is f**ked. If the whole sport got it's act together, then yes rip apart UKad but you got boxers not even signed up drug-testing in the sport. You got the WBC, WBA etc making up mickey-mouse titles and ripping fans off just to make more money by having more 'championship' fights.

The whole thing is a mess but it will never change as long as people pay to watch drug-cheat boxers fight for made-up titles.

They all are bad but ukad takes a step above with allowing cheats to continue to fight while they investigate which can take over a year.... they don’t even let the public know until after they investigation is done and they hand down they rulings took them 2years to finally suspend Molina after he tested positive allowing him to go on with his scheduled fight he pissed dirty for, did the same for the fury’s and they didn’t even serve a suspension just backdated