Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

[techliam]

Before people sh#t on anyone quoting Hearn's tweet, keep in mind the other side, it's literally unnamed sources.

In regards to UKAD notifying the athelete and promoter and not the opponent, I would have assumed that is with the understanding that the fight would obviously be off, it just makes no sense they would allow a fight to continue makes no sense at all.

Perhaps it’s substance specific

There are plenty of banned substances not related to performance enhancement. I would guess that would be the only reason they would act this way

Or perhaps, he was found with a banned substance in his system, but was below a threshold?

With the spectre of Watson v BBBC haunting British boxing perpetually, I would be surprised if it really is as corrupt as not letting the other camp know and allowing the fight

[kafkod]

En route to a London press conference 24-year-old Whyte received a phone call from UK Anti Doping (UKAD). Traces of a banned substance officially named methylhexaneamine (DMAA) were found in recent samples given by the heavyweight fighter.
Following a number of telephone conversations with a UKAD official, the British Boxing Board of Control and promoter Frank Maloney a decision not to appear at the press conference for the English heavyweight title against John Mcdermott was made. Whyte's team have claimed it was from a pre-workout drink which Whyte used in the lead up to his last bout, unaware that the product had been banned from retail outlets in the UK only weeks before.
Whyte and his team have committed to co-operate fully with the UKAD and the British Boxing Board of Control in the coming weeks.
Whyte said: “I have nothing to hide it's a genuine mistake and I urge all boxers to double check all ingredients in all pre-workout drinks they take, I would hate to see another boxer make the same mistake I have.”

Whyte and his team agreed pullout fight he could of still went on with it but nice try...

"Five months ago, Dillian Whyte packed his bags for a training camp, said goodbye to his family and told them the next time they saw him, he would be the English heavyweight boxing champion.

Two weeks later, on his way to a news conference to publicise his title fight with John McDermott, the 24-year-old received a phone call: it was UK Anti-Doping (UKAD).

The banned stimulant methylhexaneamine (MHA) had been found in a urine sample he had provided after his victory over Hungary's Sandor Balogh on 13 October. The positive test meant he was immediately given a provisional ban, so no title shot"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/22047144

STOP MAKING SHIT UP!

[Iron Fister]

Quick Takeaway

1. Matchroom's reputation is in the toilet for allowing a fight to proceed knowingly their fighter took PEDs (if it is PEDs and not recreational drugs)

2. Ruiz just got a gift from the boxing God's, because now he can legally argue that his health could be in jeopardy fighting in the U.K. as they allow fighters who piss dirty to proceed with the fight.

[SchoolTheseCats]

"Five months ago, Dillian Whyte packed his bags for a training camp, said goodbye to his family and told them the next time they saw him, he would be the English heavyweight boxing champion.

Two weeks later, on his way to a news conference to publicise his title fight with John McDermott, the 24-year-old received a phone call: it was UK Anti-Doping (UKAD).

The banned stimulant methylhexaneamine (MHA) had been found in a urine sample he had provided after his victory over Hungary's Sandor Balogh on 13 October. The positive test meant he was immediately given a provisional ban, so no title shot"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/22047144

STOP MAKING SHIT UP!

What did I make up lmao the guy popped dirty way before his fight with Mcdermott was to take place not 3 days before the fight took place..... The investigation would of took place while he was in camp for the Mcdermott fight so his handlers and bbbc agreed to cancel fight and let the process play out you posted exactly what I posted and skipped over ukad letting Molina fight after failing a test pending his investigation..... I don’t know why you trying defend something that needs no defending when it’s on ukad/bbbc site how they go about a positive test.... If a fighter or his team wants to cancel a fight pending investigation they can or they also have option of going ahead with scheduled fight while b sample is tested and other procedural steps are taken

[mlac]

Wow this is dodgy as hell, were Whytes gloves loaded as well as him being on PEDS?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxin...efore-18776478

[Bum squad]

Quick Takeaway

1. Matchroom's reputation is in the toilet for allowing a fight to proceed knowingly their fighter took PEDs (if it is PEDs and not recreational drugs)

2. Ruiz just got a gift from the boxing God's, because now he can legally argue that his health could be in jeopardy fighting in the U.K. as they allow fighters who piss dirty to proceed with the fight.

The guy only got a shot because of an american doper failing late on. How can he legally argue his health is in jeopardy when he is fighting a completely different fighter who has never been caught?

[Ake-Dawg]

En route to a London press conference 24-year-old Whyte received a phone call from UK Anti Doping (UKAD). Traces of a banned substance officially named methylhexaneamine (DMAA) were found in recent samples given by the heavyweight fighter.
Following a number of telephone conversations with a UKAD official, the British Boxing Board of Control and promoter Frank Maloney a decision not to appear at the press conference for the English heavyweight title against John Mcdermott was made. Whyte's team have claimed it was from a pre-workout drink which Whyte used in the lead up to his last bout, unaware that the product had been banned from retail outlets in the UK only weeks before.
Whyte and his team have committed to co-operate fully with the UKAD and the British Boxing Board of Control in the coming weeks.
Whyte said: “I have nothing to hide it's a genuine mistake and I urge all boxers to double check all ingredients in all pre-workout drinks they take, I would hate to see another boxer make the same mistake I have.”

Whyte and his team agreed pullout fight he could of still went on with it but nice try... This failed test happen with just 3 days left before ppv you really think Hearn was going cancel the whole card being as though none of the other fights scheduled could justify still carrying on with it on ppv as main event? UKAD/BBBC allows fighters to fight pending investigation being complete it says so on they testing site..... THE FURYS FAKED DEPRESSION/SKIN DISORDER WHY THEY DIDNT FIGHT WHILE INVESTIGATION TOOK PLACE AND UKAD JUST WASHED THEY HANDS WITH IT AND BACKDATED SUSPENSION

EDIT: BBBC/UKAD LET MOLINA GO THROUGH WITH HIS FIGHT AFTER HE FAILED A TEST BEFORE BOUT TOOK PLACE AND ONLY SUSPENDED HIM AFTER THEY COMPLETED INVESTIGATION

The two situations differ in that, based on the final decision report following his appeal, when UKAD called Whyte it was to notify him that they had concluded he'd committed an offense and would be suspended effective the day after his last fight (post fight positive test). That was almost a month after the test and he appealed in January.

[SchoolTheseCats]

The two situations differ in that, based on the final decision report following his appeal, when UKAD called Whyte it was to notify him that they had concluded he'd committed an offense and would be suspended effective the day after his last fight (post fight positive test). That was almost a month after the test and he appealed in January.

Thanks for pointing that out

[Boksfan]

Strange comment! The British heavyweight scene is pretty interesting!

They just lost a champion and top contender, if that's "interesting" to you that's cool.

[Ake-Dawg]

Thanks for pointing that out

I read in the Telegraph that Whyte immediately asked that his B sample be tested. If the protocol is that the results don't become punishable until the athlete admits wrong doing or the B sample is tested, then it explains some of why things unfolded the way they did.

The glove issue adds another layer to this story as well.