Must be more to this story than has been reported so far.
Was the test administered 3 days before and the results came back sometime later?
I just cannot believe the BBBoC would receive a positive test result 3 days prior, notify the failed fighter and allow the fight to continue without notifying the opponent. I can't believe they would let the contest take place at all.
They would know this is going to come out, how could they possible justify it, its insanity.
BBBoC: You've currently got a banned drug in your system, we're going to ban you from fighting, after this fight you have in a couple days, which we will allow you to fight in, while you actually have the banned drug in your system.
I can actually understand notifying the athelete first and not the opponant because of appeals process etc, allowing the fight to go on is inexplicable in a combat sport, heads should roll if that is the case. I just can't imagine UKAD could allow it.
Was the test administered 3 days before and the results came back sometime later?
I just cannot believe the BBBoC would receive a positive test result 3 days prior, notify the failed fighter and allow the fight to continue without notifying the opponent. I can't believe they would let the contest take place at all.
They would know this is going to come out, how could they possible justify it, its insanity.
BBBoC: You've currently got a banned drug in your system, we're going to ban you from fighting, after this fight you have in a couple days, which we will allow you to fight in, while you actually have the banned drug in your system.
I can actually understand notifying the athelete first and not the opponant because of appeals process etc, allowing the fight to go on is inexplicable in a combat sport, heads should roll if that is the case. I just can't imagine UKAD could allow it.
Comment