Isn't it sad that even though Floyd is 42 and hasn't fought since 2015 that..........
Collapse
-
People are just desperate for him to lose and would love to gloat, even if he fought at 45 and was shot to bits.Comment
-
Yes, for floyd to comeback and beat Nell at 160. Some told George foreman he couldn't do it at 44 and if he believed them he might not have beat moorer.
What's the worse that could happen, lose maybe? Oh your right, nah Floyd better not come back. The loss would be too devastating for Floyd and fans like you.
Nah, experts don't think Floyd greater. They may have had knee jerk reaction to Pac s loss to jmm and then floyd, but can revaluate. Pac s journey continued whilst floyds ended with berto. Pac s win over thurman is better than.anything floyds ever did so you sure if there was ever an expert who had Floyd ahead of Pac they wouldn't revaluate?
What does it matter what Foreman did? Everyone is different.
Floyd is 42 and retired. He beat everyone they put infront of him, including Pacquiao and Canelo. Why comeback and fight them again? He doesn’t need them, they had their shot and they lost. They were barely even competitive.
Fans need to move on from Floyd. How long is this going to continue until people let it go? Until he’s 60? The guy is approaching mid 40’s. He’s old enough to be a lot of fighters dad.
Let it go. He’s done. There’s plenty of young exciting boxers to focus on.Comment
-
Floyd hasn't beat anyone at 41 so Pac s win over thurman is better than anything Floyd ever did. Floyd fans are embellishing flouds achievements when in reality floyds selling point is just an unbeaten record. Floyd is famous for being cautious so what is it Floyd are imaging that is so incredible what floyds did?
In 100 years of boxing im sure there have been weaker champs than thurman and no 40 year olds ever won a title and took advantage of all theses weak ww so don't be so dismissive of thurman, Pac and the history of wws!
Spence and Crawford can't even boast a win over thurman yet you say thurman is no3? Did thurman look like the one against lopez with pac? Rhetorical question!Last edited by hugh grant; 07-23-2019, 04:37 PM.Comment
-
You're one of the dumbest posters on here and posts like this prove it. His win is better because he's older? That's some great reasoning right there.Floyd hasn't beat anyone at 41 so Pac s win over thurman is better than anything Floyd ever did. Floyd fans are embellishing clouds achievements when in reality.footballing point is just an unbeaten record. Floyd is famous for being cautious so what is it Floyd are imaging that is so incredible what floyds did?
In 100 years of boxing im sure there have been weaker champs than thurman and no 40 year olds ever won a title so don't be so dismissive of thurman, Pac and the history of wws!
Spence and Crawford can't even boast a win over thurman yet you say thurman is no3? Did thurman look like the one against lopez with pac? Rhetorical question!
Comment
-
I'm no where near einstein. But I'm sure if some of the few experts who have Floyd above pac, after reading my reasoning will change their minds and give Pac their blessing as the best of era and maybe of all time. Unless he fails that ped testComment
-
Mystic Lockard predicts that he will have one final fight next year, then retire from fighting for good... And I have been predicting this for quite some time. I know the futureComment
-
Maypac 2 is still the biggest money fight for both guys right now and one of the most lucrative fights in the world. Both these guys will eventually grow too old to ever step into the boxing ring again, their opportunity will pass and it'll never return but right now they're both still capable of competing so why not make one of the biggest purses in their whole career in a match up that, for the time-being, can still generate immense figures.Comment

Comment