Isn't it sad that even though Floyd is 42 and hasn't fought since 2015 that..........

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #11
    Originally posted by hugh grant
    No, People want him to improve his resume and legacy to where his fans inflate him to. The imaginary place flouyds fans have him. Floyd won't get there sitting on couch
    He beat Pacquiao. Doing it again would do very little for his resume. He's already achieved that.

    Comment

    • boliodogs
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 33358
      • 824
      • 1,782
      • 309,589

      #12
      He has the right to retired without being called a coward. Ward is almost ten years younger and Bradley is more than 10 years younger and they are retired. Any boxer can retire at any time they want and the sooner they retired the better for their health. Mayweather doesn't need the money and he doesn't need to take any more punches. I would like Pacquiao to get a rematch but I respect Mayweather's choice. Pacquiao should retire after his good win over Thurman rather than take more punishment from Spence or even Danny Garcia. He has taken lots of punches to the head already in his long career and his is worth a few hundred million bucks now so why keep fighting? If he can't get the Mayweather rematch why take any other fight. He had a great win over Thurman that would be hard to top. I think he loses to Spence who I think will beat Porter.

      Comment

      • Boxingraya
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2019
        • 1249
        • 47
        • 10
        • 49,823

        #13
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
        He beat Pacquiao. Doing it again would do very little for his resume. He's already achieved that.
        Exactly. Funny thing is, if he came back for Pac now, it would be called a pure money grab by the same folks calling for the fight today. Some folks is just naturally bitter I guess.

        Comment

        • hugh grant
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2006
          • 30648
          • 2,222
          • 940
          • 105,596

          #14
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          He beat Pacquiao. Doing it again would do very little for his resume. He's already achieved that.
          Who's talking pac? Actually beating pac in a rematch wouldn't be bad cos they should have fought more than once and general consensus is Floyd and Pac didn't do too well in fight and Floyd didn't come close to getting a ko he promised.
          But beating Nell0 at 160 would improve flouds legacy. of course it's hard to do at any age for floyd but to do things other greats have done in past isn't easy. To be considered as good as some of histories greatest fighters nobody said it was easy. Pac being oldest ever Ww champ do you think it was easy? Or beat spence!
          Last edited by hugh grant; 07-23-2019, 04:06 PM.

          Comment

          • WholeSoul75
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2011
            • 803
            • 46
            • 43
            • 26,275

            #15
            Pac wouldn't mind this exibition match up.

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #16
              Originally posted by hugh grant
              Who's talking pac? Actually beating pac in a rematch wouldn't be bad cos they should have fought more than once and general consensus is Floyd and Pac didn't do too well in fight and Floyd didn't come close to getting a ko he promised.
              But beating Nell0 at 160 would improve flouds legacy. of course it's hard to do at any age for floyd but to do things other greats have done in past isn't easy. To be considered as good as some of histories greatest fighters nobody said it was easy. Pac being oldest ever Ww champ do you think it was easy?
              This is one of the most pathetic posts i've seen. Not only do you want a fighter that has been reitred four years and is forty two years old to come back, you want him to move up to division that where fighters will have 20+ lbs on him.

              The vast majority of experts consider Mayweather greater than Pacquiao. That's a fact you'll have to deal with instead of pretending it isn't true. Mayweather has done all he needs to do. You aren't going to get what you want, Mayweather 0 will be intact. Enjoy yourself.

              Comment

              • puga
                rigo-go power rangers
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2010
                • 13980
                • 584
                • 568
                • 22,139

                #17
                Originally posted by DumpkinsPlus5
                That's part of my criteria for separating casual fans from real fans. Anybody calling for May/Pac 2 is automatically considered a casual who's not to be taken serious
                lol if you want pac vs floyd 2 you a casual fan?

                you made that rule/logic?

                Comment

                • Robbie Barrett
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 40891
                  • 2,779
                  • 667
                  • 570,921

                  #18
                  Originally posted by puga
                  lol if you want pac vs floyd 2 you a casual fan?

                  you made that rule/logic?
                  That fight would prove nothing. So yes only casuals/Pacquiao fans want it. The Mayweather loss eats them up.

                  Comment

                  • hugh grant
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 30648
                    • 2,222
                    • 940
                    • 105,596

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    This is one of the most pathetic posts i've seen. Not only do you want a fighter that has been reitred four years and is forty two years old to come back, you want him to move up to division that where fighters will have 20+ lbs on him.

                    The vast majority of experts consider Mayweather greater than Pacquiao. That's a fact you'll have to deal with instead of pretending it isn't true. Mayweather has done all he needs to do. You aren't going to get what you want, Mayweather 0 will be intact. Enjoy yourself.
                    Yes, for floyd to comeback and beat Nell at 160. Some told George foreman he couldn't do it at 44 and if he believed them he might not have beat moorer.
                    What's the worse that could happen, lose maybe? Oh your right, nah Floyd better not come back. The loss would be too devastating for Floyd and fans like you.
                    Nah, experts don't think Floyd greater. They may have had knee jerk reaction to Pac s loss to jmm and then floyd, but can revaluate. Pac s journey continued whilst floyds ended with berto. Pac s win over thurman is better than.anything floyds ever did so you sure if there was ever an expert who had Floyd ahead of Pac they wouldn't revaluate?

                    Comment

                    • Robbie Barrett
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 40891
                      • 2,779
                      • 667
                      • 570,921

                      #20
                      Originally posted by hugh grant
                      Yes, for floyd to comeback and beat Nell at 160. Some told George foreman he couldn't do it at 44 and if he believed them he might not have beat moorer.
                      What's the worse that could happen, lose maybe? Oh your right, nah Floyd better not come back. The loss would be too devastating for Floyd and fans like you.
                      Nah, experts don't think Floyd greater. They may have had knee jerk reaction to Pac s loss to jmm and then floyd, but can revaluate. Pac s journey continued whilst floyds ended with berto. Pac s win over thurman is better than.anything floyds ever did so you sure if there was ever an expert who had Floyd ahead of Pac they wouldn't revaluate?
                      Pacquiao beating the 3rd best WW who looked like **** in his last fight is better than anything Mayweather ever did? Have you actually read some of the nonsense you type?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP