What reasonable explanation is there for a fighter that makes millions not doing VADA
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I didn’t say that. If two fighters agree to it, cool. But if it’s not implemented, who cares?
There’s always drug testing being done and VADA and USADA aren’t a requirement. So why does one single person care?
These people are literally saying “this fight doesn’t feel valid because the fighters didn’t pay extra for more drug testing.”
The state commission sanctioned it so it sounds like an invented issue.
Comment
-
[IMG]https://media0.*****.com/media/SDxzM5LAVq5Tq/source.gif[/IMG]I didn’t say that. If two fighters agree to it, cool. But if it’s not implemented, who cares?
There’s always drug testing being done and VADA and USADA aren’t a requirement. So why does one single person care?
These people are literally saying “this fight doesn’t feel valid because the fighters didn’t pay extra for more drug testing.”
The state commission sanctioned it so it sounds like an invented issue.Comment
-
Funny little pic but it’s not a surprise that there’s no response.
Because what could you say? Maybe “I think there should be special rules that fit what I want in every championship fight.”
That sounds pretty f**king ******, doesn’t it?
Comment
-
Both fighters are in the clean boxing program. Both are subject to random testing, if either were cheating they were running a serious risk. In fact, it was reported here somewhere that Pac was recently tested.
I'd argue that fighters in the clean boxing program are less likely to be cheats than fighters who ONLY test during a short window of time before fights.
so many desperate threads. must be tough
Comment
-
It's been 48hrs of people justifying for why VADA wasn't needed. It's comedy central. If commissions handled it strictly, state laws would provide more funding to employ simply for it instead of athletes contracting advanced anti doping agencies.
Hence, ''advanced.''Comment
-
-
Comment