Comments Thread For: Canelo's Coach Says The Aim is To Fight in December

[Thuglife Nelo]

Canelo is what's wrong with boxing.

Nah. Some fans act like kids not sharing action figures. I liked He-Man the cartoon way back in the day but you grow out of that. Just because Loma lost to Salido don't mean you gotta hate Canelo. I mean Canelo lost to Floyd, but still, Canelo an amazing fighter. As is Loma. Just dont hate

[ruedboy]

It couldn't be clearer.
Reynoso says when the deal with Kovalev collapsed Alvarez decided he wouldn't fight in Sept.
No mention at all of fighting Deveryenchenko or Andrade.
Alvarez let his personal testing program with Vada expire, so that gives him 5 months before testing would start for a Dec fight.
It's puzzling why Alvarez would end his program with VADA because people will think he's cheating again.

[Shape up]

Why would he give someone he doesn't like what he wants? Why give in to Golovkin's demands? Canelo already did that in the rematch, even paying the diva more. Canelo told Golovkin what to do to get a 3rd fight, Golovkin chose to fight Steve Rolls instead. Canelo had to bend over for Golovkin, he's not doing it anymore.

It’s DANZ demands, Golovkin signed up for 3 fights, I guarantee that 1 of those 3 fights will be against canelo, he’s already used up 1 of those fights so in reality canelo is only delaying the inevitable if canelo has any pride he would want to fight him again, as I said it was a definite win in the first for Golovkin, the second was razor thin, not in any clear way a win for either fighter, your arguement about money doesn’t wash, they are both under contract with DANZ for a certain amount each fight so try again hater

[Shape up]

It couldn't be clearer.
Reynoso says when the deal with Kovalev collapsed Alvarez decided he wouldn't fight in Sept.
No mention at all of fighting Deveryenchenko or Andrade.
Alvarez let his personal testing program with Vada expire, so that gives him 5 months before testing would start for a Dec fight.
It's puzzling why Alvarez would end his program with VADA because people will think he's cheating again.

He will be

[Verus]

Canelo is what's wrong with boxing.

Saying that Canelo is what is wrong with boxing is one BIG sweeping statement. Is there any thought behind that bold claim.

[Robbie Barrett]

It’s DANZ demands, Golovkin signed up for 3 fights, I guarantee that 1 of those 3 fights will be against canelo, he’s already used up 1 of those fights so in reality canelo is only delaying the inevitable if canelo has any pride he would want to fight him again, as I said it was a definite win in the first for Golovkin, the second was razor thin, not in any clear way a win for either fighter, your arguement about money doesn’t wash, they are both under contract with DANZ for a certain amount each fight so try again hater

It doesn't say in Canelo's contract he has to fight Golovkin. If Canelo doesn't want to give the diva another shot he won't. Golovkin pay will be linked to if he gets the Canelo fight or not, you think he'll get the same he got for Rolls for a Canelo fight?

[ruedboy]

Why would he give someone he doesn't like what he wants? Why give in to Golovkin's demands? Canelo already did that in the rematch, even paying the diva more. Canelo told Golovkin what to do to get a 3rd fight, Golovkin chose to fight Steve Rolls instead. Canelo had to bend over for Golovkin, he's not doing it anymore.

Judges scored both fights close . Neither could dominate. so maybe the diva might want to prove he can win convincingly?

[Verus]

It’s DANZ demands, Golovkin signed up for 3 fights, I guarantee that 1 of those 3 fights will be against canelo, he’s already used up 1 of those fights so in reality canelo is only delaying the inevitable if canelo has any pride he would want to fight him again, as I said it was a definite win in the first for Golovkin, the second was razor thin, not in any clear way a win for either fighter, your arguement about money doesn’t wash, they are both under contract with DANZ for a certain amount each fight so try again hater

Yes both Alvarez and Golovkin are under contract to DAZN and they do get a "certain" amount each fight, but that amount is not the same for every fight. It has been widely reported that Golvokin will receive much more for a Canelo fight. That makes sense, who in their right mind would pay Golovkin the same amount for fighting Rolls? Nobody! A Golovkin vs Rolls fight generates zero new subscriptions while a Golvokin vs Canelo fight will generate a ton. That is what DAZN is banking on.

[Shape up]

You are forgetting that GB's folks were already in negotiations with Golovkin for a September fight. Those negotiations broke down when Golovkin insisted on fighting only in New York. Apart from the fight itself, you don't seem to have a clue about what logical means. Re-read your statement and you will see that there is nothing logical about it. There are three glaring logical errors. Also. you misspelled explanation.

Where is the problem with fighting in NY, what, no judges in GBP pockets, when scorecards come out for canelo like in the Floyd fight and the 1st Golovkin fight the only conclusion that can be made is favortism and corruption, would you agree school teacher

[Shape up]

Yes both Alvarez and Golovkin are under contract to DAZN and they do get a "certain" amount each fight, but that amount is not the same for every fight. It has been widely reported that Golvokin will receive much more for a Canelo fight. That makes sense, who in their right mind would pay Golovkin the same amount for fighting Rolls? Nobody! A Golovkin vs Rolls fight generates zero new subscriptions while a Golvokin vs Canelo fight will generate a ton. That is what DAZN is banking on.

So by your own words canelo is going to make loads more aswell, so why not fight, not 1 good excuse has been put forward, seems you fangirls don’t want to watch good fights