>>> Thurman was a cherry pick...
Collapse
-
Freddie Roach is heavily involved in picking Pacquiao's opponents. Don't make us pull up these old videos of him explaining why he choose specific opponents.Comment
-
Where was all this cherry pick talk prior to the fight? Easy to hate when the guy you think and want to lose ends up winning.Comment
-
Spence wants all of the belts at 147. That means he wants to fight Porter, Pacquiao Thurman and Crawford. He said he'll fight Danny Garcia too with or without a belt.These Floydiots always make me puke.
Spence has been trying to fight Thurman ever since I can remember. In fact, he's still mad that Thurman is not even mentioning his name. Look at his recent tirades about Thurman:
Spence: I Dislike Thurman More Than Porter; A Corny Individual
So why aren't you accusing Spence of trying to cherrypick Thurman? It's because he's a brotha, isn't it?
Spence is younger, prime at its peak, Pac is 41 and no longer in his prime. Yet you still choose to insult Pac because he's not a brotha?
That's a pretty damn good resume I'd say if he accomplished that.Comment
-
I guess to them Pacquiao is such a great fighter that an undefeated unified fighter in his Prime is a cherry pick for a 40 year old Pacquiao.
It is what it is.Comment
-
Thats about the size of it. Prior to the fight a lot of haters were talking about how PAC was going to get sparked or schooled. Now its a cherry pick. Casuals.Comment
-
Doesnt matter - Pac didn't judge the choice of opponent based on the Lopez fight since he didnt see it. Further more, this was a 50/50 fight. Anyone who thinks a 40 year old fighter picking the most accomplished Welterweight champion 10 years younger than him is a cherry pick is seriously brain dead. And the fact is, Pac became the oldest fighter in BOXING HISTORY to become welterweight champion.Last edited by richardt; 07-21-2019, 10:38 PM.Comment
-
I thought it was 60/40 pacs favor. His handlers knew Thurman has fallen off, so if you're training to fight a better Thurman than what is actually there it's a benefit. Again I know Pac took a risk I didn't say that, but Thurman was the weakest of possible opponents in my opinion yes even with porter, style wise since Porter is a brawler wrestler a la Horn but miles better. That's why I think they set it up how they did with Thurman-Pac and Porter-Spence. With the odds being in Favor of Pac-Spence.Comment
-
yah and manny is a part time boxer, 40 year old with over 70 fights, been KO'ed few times, been in so many wars, been fighting pro since 16, has had two 1 year time off...get a grip. manny is a legend. booo-frickin-hooo keith took 2 year off.Comment
Comment