Why is it only Floyd fans who say anything pac does now

[Floyd is TBE]

Why are Pacquaio fans always talking about ****sexuality, ****s, and ****ing other dudes? Is it because your hero hates ****? I understand. Must be hard knowing the man you've blindly worshiped for over a decade hates your guts. Is that why you're repressing your ****sexual urges out of shame and fear and expressing your pent up feelings as ****phobia?

[travestyny]

Floyd fans aren’t boxing fans. They talk only about Floyd, Pacquaio, Canelo, GGG and the evil Lomachenko and all because it relates to Floyd.

They aren’t fans. They are insecure and don’t like the sport or know it. I always disliked Pacquaio, but it’s clear Floyd’s IV was a cheat job and that Pacquaio is a level above career/resume wise. Nobody really doubts that outside of the Floyd “fans”. The same “fans” who’d have dumped him if one of the decisions went against him.

I don’t like Pacquaio, but I love seeing him take risky fights like last nights were the Floyd “fans” swore he’d lose and then see them cry all over the Forum and try to make it all about their celebrity crush. Most Floyd fans here are h0m0sexuals. They hate that a little Filipino had a bigger d1ck than them.

Weren't you the same one that was saying your favorite fighter Marquez took PED's in the 4th fight with Pac, because Pac was taking PED's?

Could have sworn it was something to that effect.

[The Big Dunn]

Enhances his win over pac? Horn fans don’t say it. Jmm fans don’t say it. Maybe jmm and horns fans have perspective a trait Floyd fans don’t have.
How insecure are Floyd fans..? They’d want you to believe they wanted pac to beat Thurman when we know full well they hoped Thurman would ko pac.
Because Floyd fans are not dumb they know pac is furthering distance between Floyd and pac

Another dishonest thread from a poster with no credibility.

What is really going on is all the very worst pac fans like yourself have been talking about how a win over Thurman makes Manny better than Floyd. Posters that disagree with you are refuting that. You expect that on a boxing forum.

Posters like you have tried to gerrymander manny’s career by saying he wasn’t great when Floyd beat him but now suddenly he is great again. In response to that, posters are saying this proves manny wasn’t as shot as you and others claimed he was as a way of taking credit away from Floyd for beating him and doing so clearly and by a wide margin.

Once you stop the childish BS of trying to make this win a referendum on Floyd & Manny I expect floyd fans will stop ethering you by reminding you he wasn’t shot when he lost to Horn either. He just got beat by a better man, same as Thurman did.

[hugh grant]

I

Another dishonest thread from a poster with no credibility.

What is really going on is all the very worst pac fans like yourself have been talking about how a win over Thurman makes Manny better than Floyd. Posters that disagree with you are refuting that. You expect that on a boxing forum.

Posters like you have tried to gerrymander manny’s career by saying he wasn’t great when Floyd beat him but now suddenly he is great again. In response to that, posters are saying this proves manny wasn’t as shot as you and others claimed he was as a way of taking credit away from Floyd for beating him and doing so clearly and by a wide margin.

Once you stop the childish BS of trying to make this win a referendum on Floyd & Manny I expect floyd fans will stop ethering you by reminding you he wasn’t shot when he lost to Horn either. He just got beat by a better man, same as Thurman did.

The pac Floyd fought wasn't 100% Pac. Pac had bad shoulder and iv fluids were in floyd. Floyd promised ko but Floyd looked like the one in brink of ko.
Floyd s win is nothing to boast about. Is it wrong to assume Pac who fought thurman is better than the one who fought floyd? Is it wrong to assume nel o who fought Ggg was better than one who fought floyd?
Floyd needs to rematch nel o already. If floyd wants stronger in depth resume like Pac has he needs more rematches. The turpin upset of sr r was great and all but it would be been better if he could beat sr r in rematch and twice. In same breath it wouldve been great for sr r to beat turpin In in 3rd rubber match. Pac beat Bradley in 3rd fight even though.everyone knew Pac had beaten Bradley x2 already. Srr did actually lose first fight with turpin. So Pac does more than is required and Floyd does as little as he can get away with? Without your rose tinted specs on does Floyd resume really look any good to you?
Floyd wn.first convincingly with cw green nel o. But no-one thinks he'd win now

[The Big Dunn]

I

The pac Floyd fought wasn't 100% Pac. Pac had bad shoulder and iv fluids were in floyd. Floyd promised ko but Floyd looked like the one in brink of ko.
Floyd s win is nothing to boast about. Is it wrong to assume Pac who fought thurman is better than the one who fought floyd? Is it wrong to assume nel o who fought Ggg was better than one who fought floyd?
Floyd needs to rematch nel o already. If floyd wants stronger in depth resume like Pac has he needs more rematches. The turpin upset of sr r was great and all but it would be been better if he could beat sr r in rematch and twice. In same breath it wouldve been great for sr r to beat turpin In in 3rd rubber match. Pac beat Bradley in 3rd fight even though.everyone knew Pac had beaten Bradley x2 already. Srr did actually lose first fight with turpin. So Pac does more than is required and Floyd does as little as he can get away with? Without your rose tinted specs on does Floyd resume really look any good to you?
Floyd wn.first convincingly with cw green nel o. But no-one thinks he'd win now

Discredit the win however you wish, it's still a win over Manny. Accept that fact.

Yes it is wrong to assume the Pac that fought Thurman is better than the one that fought Floyd. Floyd is significantly better than Thurman, that is why Manny lost to Floyd.

The Canelo that fought GGG isn't better than the Canelo that fought Floyd. Floyd is significantly better than Canelo, that is why he lost.Floyd is also much better than GGG, that is why even those that think GGG beat Canelo in the first or 2nd fight recognize Canelo won more rounds against GGG both times than he did Floyd.

You keep bringing up Turpin and srr even though it has no relevance. As I explained, Floyd/Manny was the equivalent of Manny/Clottey or Manny/Shane-there is simply no rematch needed because there was a clear winner. Manny fought Bradley 3 times because of the bad decision in the 1st fight. He fought morales 3 times because he got beaten the 1st time. Those are reasons rematches should occur. If Floyd had lost, there would've been a rematch.

The reason no one thinks Floyd would win against Canelo now is because he is 42 and has been retired for 4 years, fighting only exhibition fights because of the huge paydays his being the best of his era got him in the Conor and Teshin fights. It's not because people think Canelo is better.

My god you are pathetic.

[hugh grant]

Floyd s resume just isnt as in depth as pacs.. He's had 21 more fights than Floyd so had that much quality in his resume.
Floyd never rematched fighters who could enhance his legacy. Floyd left boxing with people thinking nel o would.beat him in. rematch if in nelo prime. Floyd s old so don't expect Floyd to rematch now, so can only get credit for version of Nell he fought. Just like Pac only gets credit for version of cotto or margarito Pac fought.
Floyd left boxing with people thinking he ducked young lions.
But bottom line flouds ability to enhance legacy ended when he beat tenshin..

[chrisJS]

Weren't you the same one that was saying your favorite fighter Marquez took PED's in the 4th fight with Pac, because Pac was taking PED's?

Could have sworn it was something to that effect.

I’m not a fanboy that twists everything favorably to my fighter so yes, I think Marquez possibly/probably did juice. I also think Pacquaio was juiced. I think Marquez was robbed against prime Pacquaio when he was certainly clean at his natural weight. I also think Mayweather was juiced a long time too. Pacquaio was made to be clean IMO and with Floyd’s friendship with USADA he was juiced and then the IV basically confirmed it. Mayweather weighed the same vs. Judah as he did for his last fight yet his head was twice the size. YEARS of PED usage. Probably started before Judah but became obvious around 2010, 2011.

I honestly think Pacquaio and Floyd juiced for years. Maybe 10 a piece. Mayweather was smart too. He made sure the opponent was clean while he was juiced.

[travestyny]

I’m not a fanboy that twists everything favorably to my fighter so yes, I think Marquez possibly/probably did juice. I also think Pacquaio was juiced. I think Marquez was robbed against prime Pacquaio when he was certainly clean at his natural weight. I also think Mayweather was juiced a long time too. Pacquaio was made to be clean IMO and with Floyd’s friendship with USADA he was juiced and then the IV basically confirmed it. Mayweather weighed the same vs. Judah as he did for his last fight yet his head was twice the size. YEARS of PED usage. Probably started before Judah but became obvious around 2010, 2011.

I honestly think Pacquaio and Floyd juiced for years. Maybe 10 a piece. Mayweather was smart too. He made sure the opponent was clean while he was juiced.

That makes absolutely no sense. He was juiced a long time before and didn't need an IV, but suddenly out of nowhere the night before the fight he needed an IV to juice.

You dudes just say anything. But the point is, if you think they were all juicing, there isn't a need to point out one for cheating and not the others. They would all be in the same book.

And only one of them is undefeated against the other two. So there ya go.

[chrisJS]

Floyd s resume just isnt as in depth as pacs.. He's had 21 more fights than Floyd so had that much quality in his resume.
Floyd never rematched fighters who could enhance his legacy. Floyd left boxing with people thinking nel o would.beat him in. rematch if in nelo prime. Floyd s old so don't expect Floyd to rematch now, so can only get credit for version of Nell he fought. Just like Pac only gets credit for version of cotto or margarito Pac fought.
Floyd left boxing with people thinking he ducked young lions.
But bottom line flouds ability to enhance legacy ended when he beat tenshin..

I think Floyd is the better all-around fighter but like most folks I think it’s clear Pacquaio has the far more impressive overall career. He just has more stuff that stands out. An IV infused Mayweather win over an injured way past his best Pacquaio, who was really a Featherweight doesn’t tip things dramatically enough in his favor. Sure, Floyd started at 130 but by that token Pacquaio won his first title at 112.

I’ve not compiled an all-time list but I’d imagine Pacquaio would be between 30-40 all-time whereas Floyd is around 40-50.

[chrisJS]

That makes absolutely no sense. He was juiced a long time before and didn't need an IV, but suddenly out of nowhere the night before the fight he needed an IV to juice.

You dudes just say anything. But the point is, if you think they were all juicing, there isn't a need to point out one for cheating and not the others. They would all be in the same book.

And only one of them is undefeated against the other two. So there ya go.

So, Calzaghe > Hopkins and Jones?

Calzaghe handled both, never juiced whereas Jones got caught and Hopkins was suspect at least. Calzaghe undefeated too.