Thurman landed more punches than Pacquiao

[Eddy Current]

Floyd humiliated Pacquiao and made him look ******

[D4thincarnation]

This thread was made to address the people that score fights based on who landed the most punches. If you go back and read the original post that was the whole point.

If you use the 10-point must system and score round-by-round and add any other criteria on top of that then my criticism obviously doesn't pertain to you.

Rounds are scored individually, but just using the compubox system gets the right result round by round.

You point failed.

How did you score it. Wider than 115-112?

Like it or not compubox churns out than result.


Your point was to prove compubox wrong, you failed with this example.

[D4thincarnation]

Floyd humiliated Pacquiao and made him look ******

By hugging him more times than Jinkee?

Floyd needs to know you should punch your boxing opponents and hug your girlfriend, not the other way round.

Touch jabs, running and hugging was humiliating for boxing.

[ShoulderRoll]

Rounds are scored individually, but just using the compubox system gets the right result round by round.

You point failed.

How did you score it. Wider than 115-112?

Like it or not compubox churns out than result.


Your point was to prove compubox wrong, you failed with this example.

If you're using round-by-round then you're not going just off of CompuBox's total punches landed, are you?

That's the entire point.

Mixing in CompuBox with any other scoring criteria in order to make it more acceptable does not change what I stated.

[ShoulderRoll]

By hugging him more times than Jinkee?

Floyd needs to know you should punch your boxing opponents and hug your girlfriend, not the other way round.

Touch jabs, running and hugging was humiliating for boxing.

Since you like it so much can you tell us what result CompuBox churned out for Floyd vs Pacquiao?

[D4thincarnation]

If you're using round-by-round then you're not going just off of CompuBox's total punches landed, are you?

That's the entire point.

Mixing in CompuBox with any other scoring criteria in order to make it more acceptable does not change what I stated.

Why do you think compubox scores the punches round by round then?

Compubox is about punch connects.
Scoring round by round is not a scoring criteria

[The Big Dunn]

You no clinching is illegal in boxing right?

Do you think the rules of boxing should be enforced?

Do you also think running backwards gets you extra points

I had Manny winning 114-113 or 115-112, same as the 2 judges in this fight.

I had floyd winning 118-110 same as one judge and 1 and 2 rounds different from the other 2 judges.

I had fury over wilder, ward over kovalev 1 , and manny beating Bradley when the judges erroneously have it to Bradley.

I know how to score a fight. Even when I don’t like a fighter personally I score by the rules and that is why you scores closely correlate with the scoring of fights by professional judges.

[ShoulderRoll]

Why do you think compubox scores the punches round by round then?

Compubox is about punch connects.
Scoring round by round is not a scoring criteria

CompuBox is not a scoring criteria. Which is why I don't worry about it.

Unless I'm trying to educate misguided posters on here.

[D4thincarnation]

Since you like it so much can you tell us what result CompuBox churned out for Floyd vs Pacquiao?

Mayweather 118-110.

You are against this system though, right


You go a find a fight where your point can be made.

[D4thincarnation]

CompuBox is not a scoring criteria. Which is why I don't worry about it.

Unless I'm trying to educate misguided posters on here.

Yet when it is, it churns out results you agree with.

If you are going to make points, they have to hold water.