Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What makes top American fighters superior to top UK fighters?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Bloodvenger View Post
    I'm talking about UK BROTHERS you idiot.
    Tyson Fury is a Brother. So is Tyson Fury's brother.

    Comment


    • #32
      Americans, Mexicans as well are far more physical particularly on the inside. Refs are not saving you from fighting on the inside in America like Howard Foster does. So one thing I notice about A LOT of British fighters is that they lack that inside game/dirty boxing skills and overall physicality on the inside

      AJ did this vs Andy in which he would look over to the ref for him to break while Andy kept working until the ref stepped in. Same with Josh Kelly on the same Card and why he struggled with Ray Robinson.

      Brits are good people, they're considered far more "DOCILE" meaning that they will put up with and are willing to accept certain things that Americans won't that is why British Actors are doing so great in Hollywood as well and they cast them to play Americans While Americans take much Pride in being more Defiant!
      Last edited by sicko; 07-14-2019, 12:10 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        US boxers usually come from the 'hood'. They have had a tough life and are mentally stronger. They took up boxing in the hood not some school or univ. or social program. Plus, they are natural born fighters. If you do not perform, the US public won't back you when you're down. Only survival of the fittest. So, those that do make it to the top are real tough guys...physically and mentally. They won't give up easy even if battered and bruised.

        The US champs are born champions.

        UK boxers are more engineered. They are made to "adopt and play the sports", not natural born fighters. They go to boxing academies/centres to learn the "art". They are good scientifically because they have been taught to fight. What shot to execute, when to retreat, how to do good defence, when to attack. They practice hard and are good at it. But their public supports them even when they are down. They are not mentally as strong due to upbringing, culture, and pressure. They will give up to fight another day.

        UK champs are made in the gym.


        born champs > gym champs.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Zelda View Post
          US boxers usually come from the 'hood'. They have had a tough life and are mentally stronger. They took up boxing in the hood not some school or univ. or social program. Plus, they are natural born fighters. If you do not perform, the US public won't back you when you're down. Only survival of the fittest. So, those that do make it to the top are real tough guys...physically and mentally. They won't give up easy even if battered and bruised.

          The US champs are born champions.

          UK boxers are more engineered. They are made to "adopt and play the sports", not natural born fighters. They go to boxing academies/centres to learn the "art". They are good scientifically because they have been taught to fight. What shot to execute, when to retreat, how to do good defence, when to attack. They practice hard and are good at it. But their public supports them even when they are down. They are not mentally as strong due to upbringing, culture, and pressure. They will give up to fight another day.

          UK champs are made in the gym.


          born champs > gym champs.

          LOL, this is exactly the OPPOSITE of what I just explained in detail. This dude is a special kind of stupid.

          Please tell us of a dude "from the hood" that was as tough as Buchanan. Again, it's about genetics and styles. Not zipcodes.

          If anything, being from the hood pussifies these "dudes".

          Comment


          • #35
            America has the largest percentage of ****sexuals in the world. Driven boxers are generally **** nowadays the fact that any one wouls hype wilder is laughable anyone with a brain can tell he's **** with terrible technique

            Comment


            • #36
              Hype and clever match making.

              Lots of smoke and mirrors

              Always have that home town advantage and pay of the refs and judges.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
                I am reading a bunch of nonsense here. Good and great fighters show up wherever they show up. There is nothing about being born in America that would make someone a better boxer or have a better chin. There is nothing about being born in the UK that would make someone have a weaker chin or not do well on the big stage. All nonsense. If America has an edge on the number of good fighters it would be due to a much larger population and the law of averages. If the thread starter is only talking about black boxers from the USA vs black boxers from the UK it is still nonsense and not true.
                Sure, go head and ignore 4 pages of science and evidence, and act like you're the only one who knows it all. You're just a dumb ass who thinks Lil G is the GOAT and has been deranged ever since he got whooped by Canelo.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post

                  LOL, this is exactly the OPPOSITE of what I just explained in detail. This dude is a special kind of stupid.
                  So anyone with an "opposite" view to your dumb explanation is stupid? Why visit a forum then? Just talk to yourself while looking at a mirror.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    The Brits have the #1 boxer in more divisions than America does currently... seeing as Crawford or Spence is just about it for them.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Bloodvenger View Post
                      Top UK brothers like Frank Bruno, Kell Brook, Anthony Joshua, looked the part with their bulging muscles. But they all fell apart on the biggest stage.

                      American brothers like Mike Tyson, Errol Spence, Deontay Wilder, etc, may not have the same muscular bodies, but they are the ones that truly dominate at the top.

                      Why do UK brothers seem softer than their American counterparts? Is it culture? coaches? techniques? environment? genetics?
                      Kell Brook was badly weight drained and coming off a serious injury when he fought Spence. When Kell had energy in the first 6 rounds, he was easily beating Spence. Had he not gone up in weight he would have beaten him with room to spare.

                      Ruiz was the highest level was he? Better than Whyte, Wlad, Parker and Povetkin? No he wasn't. Upsets happen in boxing.

                      Fury beat Wilder at his very worst but got ripped off. So to say Wilder and Spence dominate when neither have beaten anyone who wasn't damaged or too small is just delusion and stupidity.

                      We beat you most of the time. We have many of your fighters run like cowards from us. Our fighters have better resumes and actually fight legit world class fighters and not a heap of complete bums like your guys do.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP