Comments Thread For: Thurman Reacts To Critics: Every Welterweight Wanted Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pennstate110
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2019
    • 182
    • 33
    • 50
    • 4,521

    #61
    Originally posted by maguirre
    Strange part is they're not criticizing Spence for wanting Thurman. Spence is angry, even calls Thurman a corny individual. He's mad that Keith is not even mentioning his name. But you'll hear crickets from these PBC fans.
    Lolol EXACTLY!!!

    Comment

    • moltres.
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2015
      • 1225
      • 45
      • 31
      • 22,614

      #62
      Originally posted by Pennstate110
      Spence been calling for Keith even after the layoff...so if pac wasn't in the mix Spence would've fought Keith, then would it still be a cherry pick??

      You Spence fans are too easy
      i mean pac chose thurman after his performance against lopez. i didnt even mention spence and when he called him out. not sure what you are talking about.

      Comment

      • Pennstate110
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2019
        • 182
        • 33
        • 50
        • 4,521

        #63
        Originally posted by moltres.
        i mean pac chose thurman after his performance against lopez. i didnt even mention spence and when he called him out. not sure what you are talking about.
        My point is if ur going to criticize pacquiao for fighting Thurman criticize Spence who has been calling out Keith even after his last performance. If Pacquiao wasn't in the mix a Keith vs Spence fight would've happened. Then would it be a cherry pick for Spence? I'm not sure how you missed that simple point

        Comment

        • moltres.
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2015
          • 1225
          • 45
          • 31
          • 22,614

          #64
          Originally posted by Pennstate110
          My point is if ur going to criticize pacquiao for fighting Thurman criticize Spence who has been calling out Keith even after his last performance. If Pacquiao wasn't in the mix a Keith vs Spence fight would've happened. Then would it be a cherry pick for Spence? I'm not sure how you missed that simple point
          i didnt mention spence at all. why is he in your mind? haha. 'criticize spence please' haha

          Comment

          • moltres.
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2015
            • 1225
            • 45
            • 31
            • 22,614

            #65
            Originally posted by Pennstate110
            My point is if ur going to criticize pacquiao for fighting Thurman criticize Spence who has been calling out Keith even after his last performance. If Pacquiao wasn't in the mix a Keith vs Spence fight would've happened. Then would it be a cherry pick for Spence? I'm not sure how you missed that simple point
            im pretty sure spence said during a recent interview that he was calling for thurman when he was 14-0.

            Comment

            • Pennstate110
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2019
              • 182
              • 33
              • 50
              • 4,521

              #66
              Originally posted by moltres.
              i didnt mention spence at all. why is he in your mind? haha. 'criticize spence please' haha
              Because Spence is not 40 years old and is considered the most feared WW yet he wanted the weakest link in Keith. Yet why is Pac getting the criticism? Spence wanted Keith!!

              Comment

              • moltres.
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2015
                • 1225
                • 45
                • 31
                • 22,614

                #67
                Originally posted by Pennstate110
                Because Spence is not 40 years old and is considered the most feared WW yet he wanted the weakest link in Keith. Yet why is Pac getting the criticism? Spence wanted Keith!!
                yes, since he was 14-0. he said it this week. he has been calling for keith for years.

                tbh, i like pac vs any version of thurman, even before the layoff because its pac. id like to think this match would of happened even if keith looked great vs lopez, but im not sure.

                Comment

                • Pennstate110
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2019
                  • 182
                  • 33
                  • 50
                  • 4,521

                  #68
                  Originally posted by moltres.
                  yes, since he was 14-0. he said it this week. he has been calling for keith for years.

                  tbh, i like pac vs any version of thurman, even before the layoff because its pac. id like to think this match would of happened even if keith looked great vs lopez, but im not sure.
                  Yes but it doesn't matter if Spence has been calling him out since he was 14-0 , it still doesn't change what you said about Keith being the weakest link. Spence was calling out the weakest link and would've fought the weakest link if Pacquiao didn't. Now Spence is fighting Keith's leftovers

                  Comment

                  • Eff Pandas
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 52131
                    • 3,624
                    • 2,147
                    • 1,635,919

                    #69
                    Originally posted by _Rexy_
                    Been a while since I watched the fight, but didn’t Keith build up a big lead against Danny and then break his hand and coast to a UD win? And which tune up you talking about? He retired like 9 times lmfao
                    The Howard one. I think that was the only tuneup-like fight he re-retired after.

                    And idr if he broke something or not. Thats the other thing he's brittle it seems like. Always getting hurt & then his recovery times are r3tarded. He's Kell Brook Jr waiting to happen or some sh^t.

                    But the guy has had 4 fights in a row where he's either barely won or had tough moments vs guys he shouldn't be having tough moments against. That doesn't give me a whole lot of confidence in the guy. Andrade to me is the most beatable unbeaten tip top guy in a division right now, but Thurman is in my top 3, top 5 for f#cking sure. I don't know that Thurman could repeat his Porter W again. I definitely don't think Thurman is getting past Bud or Spence. Manny is right on the line for me of a guy I can see Thurman barely beating again or losing to.

                    Comment

                    • Eff Pandas
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 52131
                      • 3,624
                      • 2,147
                      • 1,635,919

                      #70
                      Originally posted by moltres.
                      im pretty sure spence said during a recent interview that he was calling for thurman when he was 14-0.
                      This.

                      Thurman been freaked out about fighting Spence since Spence was a f#cking prospect & he was seemingly the guy post-Floyd on the PBC side of the street. Sh^t is embarrassing Thurman has been making Spence his MayPac fight since Spence was massively unproven & still a prospect.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP