Why are people associating this WBC clownery with Canelo?
Collapse
-
Yeah, I realized that. Doesn’t really make it any different though. Who is ranked #1 for 2 years without getting a shot at the champ. #1s essentially become mandatories. Either give them the shot or remove them for not going along with your rules.
Point is the WBC just makes stuff up as they go along and never even follows its own rules.
And people act like the organizations haven’t catered to the cash cows forever, it didn’t start with Canelo and it won’t end with him.Comment
-
Trust me am with you 100%, just pointing out what I thought you didn’t realise, since you do that’s cool.Yeah, I realized that. Doesn’t really make it any different though. Who is ranked #1 for 2 years without getting a shot at the champ. #1s essentially become mandatories. Either give them the shot or remove them for not going along with your rules.
Point is the WBC just makes stuff up as they go along and never even follows its own rules.
And people act like the organizations haven’t catered to the cash cows forever, it didn’t start with Canelo and it won’t end with him.Comment
-
And Whyte turned down mando fights. Both guys got themselves into their own situations & are the #1 person to blame.Comment
-
No, canelo was allowed to fight cotto on the promise that if he won he had to fight ggg next, he then asked for a warm up fight at 160 and ended up fighting khan, then he was stripped after refusing to fight gggComment
Comment