casual fans need to learn how to score a fight.....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aboutfkntime
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 47370
    • 1,631
    • 3,563
    • 391,308

    #161
    Originally posted by kafkod
    This would be more accurate:

    one fighter is black American or hispanic

    one fighter is not

    who won that round?





    one guys fanbase needed to pull the race card

    one guys fanbase did not

    not hard to see who won the fight

    btw.....

    what's the story about posting this horse-shlt..... ???

    Originally Posted by kafkod
    Defense, effective aggression, ring generalship, etc, only become factors if both fighters appear to land the same number of clean punches.

    [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]


    here, check the instruction video.....

    the instruction video for absolute casual-fans who know little/nothing about the sport.....

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47370
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #162
      so..... the compubox kid needs proof, huh..... ?

      Originally posted by TonyGe
      You're exaggersting. There is no way Golovkin missed 1000 punches.
      There is no game going as you put it. When two fighters get in the ring it's what happens in that fight not how they fought previous fights. Using your logic Canelo should be penalized because he had a radical change in style from his first fight. Any fighter that changed styles in the ring is going to be penalized if they follow this ridiculous arguement. Golovkin did not get beat up in the second fight. He had some superficial facial swelling and a cut. Canelo also had a cut. Golovkin did not get hurt at any point in the fight. You really need to to step back from your obsession with Canelo because you are losing credibility with these outlandish statements.








      Tony Baloney.....

      you insisted that defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression..... were not a scoring factor, unless the number of clean punches landed by each fighter are exactly the same

      YOU said that, you excuse-making muppet !!

      [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]


      here, check the instruction video.....

      the instruction video for absolute casual-fans who know little/nothing about the sport.....

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47370
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #163
        Originally posted by Boxing1013
        So true...not that hard to understand lol...but I think some are compelled to move the goalposts when what happens in the ring doesn't suit their preferred fighter...we are all probably guilty of that in a way...but some keep it a little more 'real' than others..



        you just attempted to remove defence, effective aggression, ring generalship..... from the official list of scoring criteria

        what a total fkn doorknob


        Steve Weisfeld says.....


        [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]


        Comment

        • aboutfkntime
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 47370
          • 1,631
          • 3,563
          • 391,308

          #164
          it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO

          ..... no no, " volume "..... is suddenly more important than the OFFICIAL scoring criteria LMAO




          Comment

          • OnePunch
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 9101
            • 1,302
            • 767
            • 2,453,131

            #165
            Originally posted by kafkod
            This would be more accurate:

            one fighter is black American or hispanic

            one fighter is not

            who won that round?

            lol true. I forgot about that rare species, the black Brit. Lennox, AJ, Dillian Whyte, Eubank, Brook, even probably Frank Bruno, all automatically rubbish, and not really "black"

            good call.. LOL

            Comment

            • Spoon23
              INVINCIBLE
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 20624
              • 922
              • 904
              • 107,969

              #166
              If you think Judges can't be corrupt its about damnfuvkntime you stop being naive.

              Comment

              • Boxing_1013
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2019
                • 6845
                • 184
                • 256
                • 157,917

                #167
                Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                you just attempted to remove defence, effective aggression, ring generalship..... from the official list of scoring criteria

                what a total fkn doorknob
                Ello mate ;0 - Honestly my friend I was just trying to inform you of how judges score fights...it happens to line up with my worldview as well, and I personally am surprised that some boxing fans are scoring anything other than landed punches and their effectiveness.

                The other stuff certainly matters, as Weisfeld below points out...but it is not actively scored...those things just help a fighter get in his position to score points, by landing punches:

                "A lot of times fans hear that judges focus on four categories: clean punches, effective aggressiveness, defense and ring generalship," Weisfeld said. "But based upon my own experience, my conversations with other judges and seminars conducted by top judges, judges really focus on one category, and that's clean punches.

                Clean punches: To me, clean punches are the most important aspect, and the other factors are really tied to that. Take the phrase, "effective aggressiveness." How is a boxer effective? He's effective by landing clean punches. How about "defense?" A boxer shows great defense by not getting hit with clean punches. And, finally, the term "ring generalship." A boxer uses the ring to put himself in a position to land clean punches."


                I've posted that for you a number of times, not sure why you are keeping with the same arguments my friend.

                Originally posted by Spoon23
                If you think Judges can't be corrupt its about damnfuvkntime you stop being naive.
                Lol this...100 times sir...main problem in boxing scoring is corrupt judging...95% of fights have 1 clear winner...for anyone to suggest otherwise, I mean I don't get it...

                Comment

                • TonyGe
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 11867
                  • 379
                  • 149
                  • 173,865

                  #168
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime





                  Tony Baloney.....

                  you insisted that defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression..... were not a scoring factor, unless the number of clean punches landed by each fighter are exactly the same

                  YOU said that, you excuse-making muppet !!

                  [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]


                  here, check the instruction video.....

                  the instruction video for absolute casual-fans who know little/nothing about the sport.....

                  Well you fell for it. I knew if I waited long enough I'd catch a sucker. So for all your BS about Compubox you looked that up long ago because you have been carping about the punch output for quite a while.

                  Comment

                  • TonyGe
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2016
                    • 11867
                    • 379
                    • 149
                    • 173,865

                    #169
                    Originally posted by aboutfkntime





                    Tony Baloney.....

                    you insisted that defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression..... were not a scoring factor, unless the number of clean punches landed by each fighter are exactly the same

                    YOU said that, you excuse-making muppet !!

                    [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]


                    here, check the instruction video.....

                    the instruction video for absolute casual-fans who know little/nothing about the sport.....

                    No I said if the judge has difficulty deciding who won the round then use the guidelines. Two guys could land the the same amount of punches and one boxer ends up barely making it back to his corner. You are the guy that responded to a post giving the scenario that one fighter lands twice the amount of clean punches on his opponent. You responded thst he loses the round if the other fighter shows better defense. Which is totally preposterous. Like I said you are so invested in winning this arguement you have given up common sense.
                    Last edited by TonyGe; 06-24-2019, 09:18 PM.

                    Comment

                    • kafkod
                      I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2013
                      • 24800
                      • 2,184
                      • 1,803
                      • 405,373

                      #170
                      Originally posted by TonyGe
                      Well you fell for it. I knew if I waited long enough I'd catch a sucker. So for all your BS about Compubox you looked that up long ago because you have been carping about the punch output for quite a while.
                      He often does that with Compubox.

                      When the stats don't fit his agenda, Compubox is for casual fanboy muppets.

                      When they do fit his agenda, Compubox is the truth!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP