Fury's nandrolone reading was never revealed by UKAD

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kafkod
    I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 24876
    • 2,213
    • 1,829
    • 405,373

    #1

    Fury's nandrolone reading was never revealed by UKAD

    I've been reading posts by a few ill informed members - AKA lying kunts - talking about the sky-high concentration of nandrolone in Tyson Fury's flagged urine sample back in 2015.

    The truth is that the actual amount of nandrolone in Tyson and Hughie's urine samples was never disclosed by either UKAD or Team Fury.

    https://www.ukad.org.uk/sites/defaul...06/FOI-187.pdf
  • tonysoprano
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2017
    • 1919
    • 486
    • 1,115
    • 16,233

    #2
    So 2 cousins with the same trainer both test positive for a raised level of Nandrolone. This is a coincidence right?

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #3
      The Fury's accepted they failed tests and a 2 year ban. They're guilty, get over it.

      Comment

      • AJ's Boy
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Aug 2016
        • 475
        • 64
        • 63
        • 6,222

        #4
        Gypsy Queen cheated. End of story. Quit crying.

        Comment

        • JohnCastellanos
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2018
          • 2800
          • 127
          • 184
          • 125,754

          #5
          This explains his relaxed “he did absolutely nothing wrong” attitude in regards to BJS being suspended for his Andrade fight!

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #6
            Originally posted by JohnCastellanos
            This explains his relaxed “he did absolutely nothing wrong” attitude in regards to BJS being suspended for his Andrade fight!
            Under any commissions rules and WADA's BJS did nothing wrong. Only VADA say he did. So many rules it's ridiculous. Should just follow WADA, if it's good enough for the Olympics it's good enough for boxing.

            Comment

            • naranja111
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Aug 2018
              • 329
              • 18
              • 486
              • 14,604

              #7
              Ukad in Feb 2015: call in the Furys and tell them to watch their diets. There are trace levels of nandrolene in their systems but nothing to worry about.

              June 2016: Ukad decide fury failed the test nearly 18 months later

              Comment

              • Robbie Barrett
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 40891
                • 2,779
                • 667
                • 570,921

                #8
                Originally posted by naranja111
                Ukad in Feb 2015: call in the Furys and tell them to watch their diets. There are trace levels of nandrolene in their systems but nothing to worry about.

                June 2016: Ukad decide fury failed the test nearly 18 months later
                December 2017: Fury's accept guilt and receive a backdated 2 year ban.

                Comment

                • kafkod
                  I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 24876
                  • 2,213
                  • 1,829
                  • 405,373

                  #9
                  Originally posted by tonysoprano
                  So 2 cousins with the same trainer both test positive for a raised level of Nandrolone. This is a coincidence right?
                  No coincidence. They were both HWs, both training for fights in the same camp, eating the same diet and using the same supplements, and they were both tested at the same time

                  Comment

                  • kafkod
                    I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 24876
                    • 2,213
                    • 1,829
                    • 405,373

                    #10
                    Originally posted by naranja111
                    Ukad in Feb 2015: call in the Furys and tell them to watch their diets. There are trace levels of nandrolene in their systems but nothing to worry about.

                    June 2016: Ukad decide fury failed the test nearly 18 months later
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    December 2017: Fury's accept guilt and receive a backdated 2 year ban.
                    What you have to remember is that Tyson and Hughie were never found guilty of PED abuse by a medical/legal tribunal after the evidence was presented and considered, because their cases were never heard by a tribunal.

                    UKAD got the tribunal hearings postponed multiple times before eventually offering Team Fury a deal which meant that the nandrolone accusations never went before the tribunal

                    In their statement, UKAD themselves admitted that waiting 15 months before acting on a test result made it impossible for the Furys to adequately defend themselves against accusations made on the basis of those test results.

                    This meant that the Furys would 100% have been acquitted by the tribunal, and could then have sued UKAD for defamation and loss of earnings.

                    Luckily for UKAD, the nandrolone charges weren't the only thing they had against the Furys. After being accused of cheating, Tyson verbally abused a UKAD team who came to the Fury gym to conduct more tests and refused to co-operate with them. UKAD then charged him with refusing to be tested, the penalty for which is an automatic 4 year ban.

                    The deal was that UKAD withdrew that charge in return for both cousins accepting a back-dated 2 year ban for the nandrolone charge without taking their cases to the tribunal.
                    Last edited by kafkod; 06-18-2019, 04:03 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP