Comments Thread For: Thurman on PEDs: Let Pacquaio Take Whatever the F*** He Wants!

[IceTrayDaGang]

the mayweathers accused manny of using PEDS, steroids, NOT meth. Manny sued for that and won. how did manny end up winning? mayweathers got no proof and paid out his own pocket! lol.

crack head roger accused manny of being on A-Side meth. there is no such thing as "A-side meth". crack head roger got that mixed up with "agimat".. agimat is a myth that filipinos soldiers believe will protect them during the war.

roger mayweathers claimed he saw this during the "vietnam" war ak-47 bullets bouncing off they azz (in his own words), the only thing is pac is filipino lol.

[Jab jab boom]

The ones on PEDs already got busted, if the boxing drug testing commissions really want to clean up the sports, then they should make it mandatory for every single boxer to take year round testing and not allow them to fight until they do so, no exceptions.

on that I agree, but.....if I'm a boxer who has made millions upon millions, I'm the guaranteed A side in every fight that can be made at welterweight right now, I've been "falsely" accused of ped use, I'd be doing 2 things. I'm testing yr round to shut everyone up and I'm insisting that everyone that I face must test at least 3 months out from a fight to ensure that they're not juicing either. To me, the fact that pac does the complete opposite of that, speaks volumes.

[aboutfkntime]

Lots of things are 'highly surprising'. But the burden of proof is on you. Otherwise we can just presume that anyone is doping and just not being caught. It was 'highly surprising' that Miller was able to maintain such a punch output and stamina etc, without much question, up to the point where he got caught.

The whole Pacquiao refusing to agree to whatever blood tests, I felt was more down to ego than anything, i.e. he/TR didn't want to lie down and comply with whatever Mayweather wanted. Yeah he could have been refusing because he had something to hide. But we'll never know will we. So all you have is that it's 'highly surprising'. Solid argument.

To clarify, I'm neither a Pacquiao or Mayweather fanboy. Just saying it the way I saw things.

no, it is not !!

this is not a court-room, or a judicial system.....

I am not a lawyer, I am a boxing fan.....

..... a very experienced one

if you do not find it su****ious - or at least HIGHLY SURPRISING - that Manny gained 12lbs of muscle as he skipped through THREE divisions in 9 months, DOUBLING his punch-output..... then you have not been following this sport for very long

when Pac refused to test..... he was a 1200+ punch dynamo, who never got tired, and could perform for hours in a concert immediately following his fight.....

..... but when he finally agreed to test, he was a normal 400-500 punch fighter, who looked exhausted at the end of a fight..... just like everyone else.....

there is an obvious reason why Manny killed a super-fight by refusing to undertake a few harmless blood tests..... LIKE EVERYONE ELSE

it does not matter if you disagree, or do not want to hear

[aboutfkntime]

This isn't the court of law so innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply. Pac has refused drug tests in the past citing that he was scared of needles or that taking blood weakens him, with all of the ped use going on today , why isn't he as the A side insisting on testing for this fight ? Why was Broner the one who insisted on testing for the last fight but it started way too late? Why did pacs ko power suddenly reappear when he fought mathysse during a fight that had no testing, after not having a ko for 9 yrs?? Why did roach admit that he had no clue what ariza was giving pac when he was in his camp and that ariza refused to tell him?? You wait on a positive test if you want... But it's pretty clear what the deal is even if you're too much in denial to see it. You're like the guy who is so in love with a girl that he refuses to see that she's cheating on him even though all of his friends are warning him.

admitting the obvious is a GREAT way to start rebuilding your reputation

work on Golovkin and Joshua next

[Bluebird]

Sorry. But I'm going with his initial self admission because he has now been proven to be a liar.


Allow me to explain:

What if I publicly called you out for being a closet ****sexual.

You decide to sue me for defemation of character and deny being a ****.

During the case I am unable to provide any reasonable proof to support my accusations. I requst you to provide dating history. Still no proof. It is determined that I acted maliciously and and you win.

Years later you admit to expirmenting with the same sex up until you met your wife.


Guess what. You are a ****sexual. Maybe you stopped being a ****** but you are a ******.


Not only that but you are a LIAR.


If you admitted to being a **** during the case, you dont win the defemation suit.


So for you to use "winning the defemation lawsuit" as proof that Manny is clean - means you are a ******.


Got it?

Ha ha ha ha! You’re a funny guy, it doesn’t apply to me because I am not, but I suggest you be careful using that thing as an example, Pac got in trouble for giving his opinion about that thing a few years back, remember? Now with the jokes set aside, Pac using drugs during his youth has nothing to do at that time of the Mayweather accusations because those are 2 different times. Otherwise, Mayweather wouldn’t pay Pac to settle the lawsuit. He sued because he was being accused of something he didn’t do at that particular time. Sure he used drugs in his younger years but his younger years doesn’t apply to that particular time. They were only talking about the present time. You got it?

[Dosumpthin]

the mayweathers accused manny of using PEDS, steroids, NOT meth. Manny sued for that and won. how did manny end up winning? mayweathers got no proof and paid out his own pocket! lol.

crack head roger accused manny of being on A-Side meth. there is no such thing as "A-side meth". crack head roger got that mixed up with "agimat".. agimat is a myth that filipinos soldiers believe will protect them during the war.

roger mayweathers claimed he saw this during the "vietnam" war ak-47 bullets bouncing off they azz (in his own words), the only thing is pac is filipino lol.

You the dumbest poster


You say "not meth" then says "a side meth"

Then go on and says he meant "agimat" when referencing "vietnam" soliders.



Time to stop bus****ing and admit roger was right. There is a reason why someone was caught using abusing Toradol. Roger was right all along.

[IceTrayDaGang]

the mayweathers such as floyd and sr did NOT accused pac of being on meth!! they accused pac of being on roids and that's why they got sued and paid for it! why do you think floyd settle and paid out his pocket then???

now crack head roger, that's another story!! crack head was accusing manny of being on "a-side meth"! which he got mixed up with "agimat"!!! which is suppose to give you power!!

roger was claiming he saw this during the vietnam war!! BUT pac is filipino not vietnamese! lol!! there is no such thing as "a-side meth".. what is "a-side meth" then?? can you show me what "a-side meth is"???

now "agimat", i can tell you what "agimat" is. LOL!!! "agimat" is a myth that soliders believe will protect them from danger. and if manny was on "agimat" we saw in the 4th marquez fight that it didnt protect manny from "danger".. you catch my drift playa playa? buahahah!!!!!!!!!!

[Dosumpthin]

Ha ha ha ha! You’re a funny guy, it doesn’t apply to me because I am not, but I suggest you be careful using that thing as an example, Pac got in trouble for giving his opinion about that thing a few years back, remember? Now with the jokes set aside, Pac using drugs during his youth has nothing to do at that time of the Mayweather accusations because those are 2 different times. Otherwise, Mayweather wouldn’t pay Pac to settle the lawsuit. He sued because he was being accused of something he didn’t do at that particular time. Sure he used drugs in his younger years but his younger years doesn’t apply to that particular time. They were only talking about the present time. You got it?

Seriously though defemation of character is complicated.

All the Mayweathers had to do was present information that gave them reason to believe what they said was true. -Manny uses METH. Easier said than done - but it would disprove malicious intent.

Manny Pacquiao intentionally withholding vital information such as a previous history using METH impacted the Mayweathers ability to defend themselves.



What's done is done.



One thing is for sure - it doesnt matter if you think Mannys drug use was harmless - you can not deny the FACT he is a liar. And he lies about drug use. FACT.

[Dosumpthin]

the mayweathers such as floyd and sr did NOT accused pac of being on meth!! they accused pac of being on roids and that's why they got sued and paid for it! why do you think floyd settle and paid out his pocket then???

now crack head roger, that's another story!! crack head was accusing manny of being on "a-side meth"! which he got mixed up with "agimat"!!! which is suppose to give you power!!

roger was claiming he saw this during the vietnam war!! BUT pac is filipino not vietnamese! lol!! there is no such thing as "a-side meth".. what is "a-side meth" then?? can you show me what "a-side meth is"???

now "agimat", i can tell you what "agimat" is. LOL!!! "agimat" is a myth that soliders believe will protect them from danger. and if manny was on "agimat" we saw in the 4th marquez fight that it didnt protect manny from "danger".. you catch my drift playa playa? buahahah!!!!!!!!!!

If Roger was referencing vietnamese - then why do you think he was trying to say "Agimat" which has nothing to do with vietnam?


Lol. Big Dummy.


Agimat was some dumb defense Filipino Manny supports came up with for "Aside" Meth.

"tank chocolate" was the nickname for the METH German soldiers used.
Would you feel better if Roger called it "tank chocolate"?


Bottom line Manny uses Shabu - same **** given to soldiers on the battlefield. Roger was right. Cant deny it. Time to accept it.

[Jab jab boom]

admitting the obvious is a GREAT way to start rebuilding your reputation

work on Golovkin and Joshua next

we disagree on Canelo and ggg.. Always will. But you won't catch me defending pac nor Joshua.