ARTURO GATTI, hall of famer?

[DUPLICITY]

nobody gives a **** about your elite fighter bs, hes is the most entertaining fighter, boxing is an entertainment business, therefore if your the most entertaining in entertainment then you are the best in that aspect, thats just one way that he is good enough to be in hall of fame

EMMANUEL AUGUSTUS FOR THE HALL OF FAME!!

Gatti is a second (maybe) rate fighter. Get over it.

Stop crying . He is what he is.

[Dyl-G]

EMMANUEL AUGUSTUS FOR THE HALL OF FAME!!

Gatti is a second (maybe) rate fighter. Get over it.

Stop crying . He is what he is.

emmanual agustus aint **** compared to gatti, war > dancing

[Obdeboondocks]

easily hall of famer. if not because of his longevity and heart put in the number of fights of the year he has been in and been a candidate for.

[AREALFIGHTER]

I thought it was 3...

Robinson I
Ward I
Ward III

Gatti-Ruelas was FOTY? Really? I've never seen it, so I wouldn't know.

I'll boxrec it, one sec.

i think ruelis was ko of the year

[AREALFIGHTER]

boxing is an entertainment sport, its an entertainment business, gatti is one of the most entertaining fighters, along with changing styles, tough competition, heart, spirit, being one of hbos largest grossing boxers, multiple titles, never ducking anyone... he definetly deserves hall of fame

I would also say that the guys he has beat have been underrated. He has loss to avrage above avarge fighters. One of his most underated victories was dorin. That little **** was tough as nails and I think he beat Spattafora in there draw fight. He had never been down and never lost and was a legit belt holder at 135. got was not supposed to stop rueles if I remeber right and he was not doing well in the fight until he ko'ed him that fight was a long time ago. and he beat pattersonand rodregiz at the beginging of his first reign.

[AREALFIGHTER]

also gatti never lost in the ring at 130 he moved up and lost three in a row but then came back stong then won a title a vacnt won agienst a much better branco than the one that fought cotto and damgaard was just not that good to begin with although he was scapy but out classed. Gatti belongs in the hall because of who he is and what he has done for the sport and there are worse fighters in the hall than gatti. If he can beat baldi which will be a fight to remember maybe an other fight of the year then he is a lock.

[AREALFIGHTER]

Diego Corrales has been competitive with , and victorious over, other elite fighters.

Gatti has never been competitive with an elite fighter.

Gatti has never beaten an elite fighter.

Those are the facts.

beacuse he has faced only two and they only picked him because of his name and box office apeal you ****en ass clown. and he got handled in both fights that he was given almost no chance at winning. I thought he had a puchers chance against mayweather. Oscar however was the bigger stronger faster man. YOur opinion as just like your ass you ****en clown all they can produce is win thats smells like ass.

[yrrej]

Lots of old-time fighters like Gatti deserve to be in the Hall of Fame. Put them in first.....

[hellfire508]

Hell, he is a B grade fighter at best. But goddam, the man deserves the hall of fame. Why? Because of what he has given fans. With the standards they have over there... he is a shoe in. Sure his record isn't that great, and he aint all that talented. But the human highlight film has given me enough moments that will stay with me forever, to willingly give him the nod.

[JohnL]

It's called the Hall of FameAnd Gatti is doubtless one of the three or four most famous fighters alive. I think induction is usually based on more than wins and losses alone. If Gatti wins Saturday, he's in without controversy