Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: Thurman is The Type of Challenge That I Crave

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chrismart
    OK Jim...
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 14295
    • 837
    • 1,762
    • 308,493

    #51
    I feel Thurman might have a little too much for Pacquiao at this stage. Prime Pac would win all day, but this is far from prime Pac.

    Thurman's a good fighter. He had a bit of a tough night with Lopez, but he had been out of the ring a long time previously.

    I'm looking forward to the fight though as I'm interested in seeing what happens. It would be a great win for Pacquiao if he could pull it off, hopefully he does.

    Comment

    • theface07
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 3851
      • 476
      • 45
      • 49,777

      #52
      I know there are a lot of people on here who like to **** on Pacquiao but at his age, you have to give him credit for taking on quality opposition. He could easily just fight over the hill journeyman types but he's still a legit contender at welterweight even if Crawford and Spence are the clear front runners.

      Comment

      • theface07
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2013
        • 3851
        • 476
        • 45
        • 49,777

        #53
        Originally posted by Curtis2
        Pac vs Thurman=Trash PPV...C level fighters trying hard for payday!
        C level? So what does that make Spence and Crawford, B level?
        GTFOH.
        Also, shouldn't you be trying hard for a payday, especially when it's a serious boxing match?

        Comment

        • theface07
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2013
          • 3851
          • 476
          • 45
          • 49,777

          #54
          Originally posted by Drew Bundini Br
          PAC dodged CRAWFORD for 5yrs and we just saw PAC pump fake on the SPENCE fight. I'm not impressed that PAC wants THURMAN who is coming off 2.5yr layoff.
          So much is wrong with this statement. Pac dodged Crawford for 5 years? I don't think Crawford was even on Pacquiao's radar 5 years ago. Secondly, Thurman already had a fight since coming back. Did you not know that? Also, Pacquiao is 40, Thurman is undefeated and should be in his prime regardless of a long layoff. This is a solid match up. Stop hating just for the sake of hating.

          Comment

          • theface07
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2013
            • 3851
            • 476
            • 45
            • 49,777

            #55
            Originally posted by Realizniguhnit
            Pacquiao is past it and Thurman hasn't fought anybody in 2+ years after winning 2 close decisions over Porter and Garcia and ducking a willing Spence in the process... It's amazing that they even let Thurman keep the 1 belt he has for so long. You can't stay at #1 for chit you did over 2 years ago.
            Even though I thought he deserved the nod against Wilder, tell that to the lineal champ, Tyson Fury.

            Comment

            • theface07
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2013
              • 3851
              • 476
              • 45
              • 49,777

              #56
              Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat
              Good post. Green K.

              I have Spence and Crawford as the top 2.
              The Pacman should call it a day very soon.
              He just schooled Broner. When is his sorry ass gonna retire?

              Comment

              • Mr.365
                Undisputed Champion
                • Oct 2018
                • 1233
                • 77
                • 153
                • 36,030

                #57
                Sounds gay

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP