Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez is an Excellent Fighter... But Not The Best

[aboutfkntime]

But isn't it claimed Pac has the best resume, whatever that is

you think that Pacquiao should be ranked P4P #1... ?

so, I guess using that same methodology, Golovkin should not be ranked?

[champion4ever]

guys, there is no way to spin it..... if "resume doe" is your MAIN determining factor, then this is your P4P list.....


1) Pacquiao
2) *****
3) *****
4) *****
5) *****
6) *****
7) *****
8) *****
9) *****
10) *****
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
* Golovkin


fill in the blanks however you see fit..... it does not matter who else, because nobody will note of a list with Pacquiao ranked #1 and Golovkin missing anyway

I agree. In addition, to Canelo's resume he has never dominated or won decisively over any of the top names he has fought as Pacquiao and Lomachenko have.

[Curtis Harper]

I know man, these haters are ignorant fans.

With AFT being the exception, they won't say who is great, but they ''know'' who isn't........

They like how some guys steamroll over bums while hate how some guys have to go to hell and beck vs quality opponents.

[Curtis Harper]

you think that Pacquiao should be ranked P4P #1... ?

so, I guess using that same methodology, Golovkin should not be ranked?

Comparing resumes, whatever they are, should solve the riddle. I've been sending you quotes in the hopes of this comparison.

[aboutfkntime]

Compare that which you

Shouldn't be hard

what does that reply actually mean.....?

look, if " resume doe " is YOUR MAIN determining factor, then this is YOUR P4P list.....


1) Pacquiao
2) *****
3) *****
4) *****
5) *****
6) *****
7) *****
8) *****
9) *****
10) *****
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
* Golovkin


right..... ?

because, you certainly cannot have double-standards..... either, resume is your MAIN criteria..... or it is just a determining factor

either, stick with resume..... ranking Pac at #1, and removing Golovkin..... or, leave it as-is..... with Pac removed and Golovkin keeping his (lower-ranked) spot

using style / skills / form is not only more accurate..... it prevents all of the flip-flopping and selective reasoning

[Curtis Harper]

what does that reply actually mean.....?

look, if " resume doe " is YOUR MAIN determining factor, then this is YOUR P4P list.....


1) Pacquiao
2) *****
3) *****
4) *****
5) *****
6) *****
7) *****
8) *****
9) *****
10) *****
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
* Golovkin


right..... ?

because, you certainly cannot have double-standards..... either, resume is your MAIN criteria..... or it is just a determining factor

either, stick with resume..... ranking Pac at #1, and removing Golovkin..... or, leave it as-is..... with Pac removed and Golovkin keeping his (lower-ranked) spot

using style / skills / form is not only more accurate..... it prevents all of the flip-flopping and selective reasoning

Compare the resumes then. How many times will it take ?

[aboutfkntime]

Comparing resumes, whatever they are, should solve the riddle. I've been sending you quotes in the hopes of this comparison.

right, so..... you do think that Pacquiao should be ranked P4P #1

and, using that same methodology..... Golovkin should not be ranked

your call I suppose..... because your P4P list is just that.... your P4P list

just a tip, perhaps you might want to keep that list to yourself

[aboutfkntime]

Compare the resumes then. How many times will it take ?

compare who's resume..... Pacquiao and Golovkin ?

btw, in a reasonable debate, if I am trying to prove you wrong..... am I really compelled to answer unnecessary simpleton questions?

don't take it there, it will not end well..... we can agree to disagree

if we do..... I of course, will wonder about your P4P list..... you have Pac #1, based on resume..... but who are 2-10?

[Curtis Harper]

right, so..... you do think that Pacquiao should be ranked P4P #1

and, using that same methodology..... Golovkin should not be ranked

your call I suppose..... because your P4P list is just that.... your P4P list

just a tip, perhaps you might want to keep that list to yourself

I never said Pac should be number 1. IN FACT, I stated otherwise. It was one of the earlier ''Please compare resumes'' replies I made to your p4p list.

It's all there if you're curious.

[Curtis Harper]

compare who's resume..... Pacquiao and Golovkin ?

btw, in a reasonable debate, if I am trying to prove you wrong..... am I really compelled to answer unnecessary simpleton questions?

don't take it there, it will not end well..... we can agree to disagree

if we do..... I of course, will wonder about your P4P list..... you have Pac #1, based on resume..... but who are 2-10?

For being the smartest man in the room, you're having much difficulty with a simple request.

Compare Pac's resume with Nelo....since he is the main topic of this ''he ain't great'' thread............................................ ..