Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez is an Excellent Fighter... But Not The Best

[RamBoVee]

Look I think we all kinda know Canelo is not the guy. Right?

He is good for boxing yes! Third world people like the Red hair and the super light skin representing a brown nation. It's like " see .... we have him!!! LOL.

But he's not the one. Canelo is not great. End of story!!!

[Curtis Harper]

What a stu.pid comment.

1-Crawford and Lomachenko are fighting with bums, the best rival that Crawford faced was a small Gamboa and he had a lot of troubles.

Lomachenko only faced two elite rivals: salido and Russell JR.

Salido beat Loma.

Big difference in canelo defeated by Floyd at 23 years old.

2-Only idi.ot people like you think this.

Science showed that Canelo doping was because the tainted meat.

He is enrolled with the hardest VADA test last 3 fights and he showed that his strenght is natural.

Stu.pid, read more about this and stop with your sh.it.


3-Lomachenko LOST against Salido.

The only that beat Canelo was Floyd, not Lara, and not GGG, only in their wet dreams of the haters those fighters won a fight against Canelo.

Were competitive fights but the result was fair. A close win against Lara and a Draw against GGG in the first.

4-Canelo has a tremendous skillset, he is a high level fighter and he showed this against P4P rivals, not sh.its like Postol, Linares, Horn, Marriagas.

This is a waste of time trying to distinguish bummy opponents from REAL opponents with some people.

If someone thinks Bud had a tougher time with his resume than Nelo with his, that should end the discussion.

[Curtis Harper]

Look I think we all kinda know Canelo is not the guy. Right?

He is good for boxing yes! Third world people like the Red hair and the super light skin representing a brown nation. It's like " see .... we have him!!! LOL.

But he's not the one. Canelo is not great. End of story!!!

Who is great and why ???

Be very specific with the why part.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Look I think we all kinda know Canelo is not the guy. Right?

He is good for boxing yes! Third world people like the Red hair and the super light skin representing a brown nation. It's like " see .... we have him!!! LOL.

But he's not the one. Canelo is not great. End of story!!!

The racist and hate in this comment
Is fu.cking incredible

Canelo is better than Loma and Crawford and he is younger than them

[Mexican_Puppet]

This is a waste of time trying to distinguish bummy opponents from REAL opponents with some people.

If someone thinks Bud had a tougher time with his resume than Nelo with his, that should end the discussion.

I know man, these haters are ignorant fans.

[aboutfkntime]

This is no longer about anyone specifically. To me anyway (I dealt with the p4p issue in another comment).

You shouldn't assume you're the only one with a decent amount of knowledge. TBF, 99 % of people here make the same claim !

Resumes gives a person all the important info they need. It will PROVE who an elite boxer is. You can disagree with me but I doubt you can refute it.

demanding absolute proof, for something that is purely hypothetical..... seems silly

especially considering the fact that plenty of P4P fighters lost to opponents who were not ranked P4P

your proof..... is proof of nothing, other than what they did yesterday..... case in point, Pacquiao

demanding by resume, is requiring someone to draw you a roadmap..... like I said, it takes knowledge and understanding, especially when it comes to style

[champion4ever]

What a stu.pid comment.

1-Crawford and Lomachenko are fighting with bums, the best rival that Crawford faced was a small Gamboa and he had a lot of troubles.

Lomachenko only faced two elite rivals: salido and Russell JR.

Salido beat Loma.

Big difference in canelo defeated by Floyd at 23 years old.

2-Only idi.ot people like you think this.

Science showed that Canelo doping was because the tainted meat.

He is enrolled with the hardest VADA test last 3 fights and he showed that his strenght is natural.

Stu.pid, read more about this and stop with your sh.it.


3-Lomachenko LOST against Salido.

The only that beat Canelo was Floyd, not Lara, and not GGG, only in their wet dreams of the haters those fighters won a fight against Canelo.

Were competitive fights but the result was fair. A close win against Lara and a Draw against GGG in the first.

4-Canelo has a tremendous skillset, he is a high level fighter and he showed this against P4P rivals, not sh.its like Postol, Linares, Horn, Marriagas.

Well let me ask you this. How do we know whether or not he was clean in those fights? I am sorry but I don't know about you but I could never rank a drug cheat ahead of a clean fighter.

There's a very strong possibility that he was doping in both the Trout, Mayweather, Lara, Cotto, Chavez, Jr and the first Golovkin bout. We will never know because he was never enrolled in the year round, 365 day VADA Clean Boxing Program in association with the WBC.

Lomachenko and Crawford did theirs the right way cleanly. However, with Canelo Alvarez we will never know because there are just too many question marks.

Lastly that tainted contaminated beef excuse is all bullshit! LOL, Ginger knew exactly what he was doing. He had been doing it for years. He was cheating in order to gain an unfair edge and an advantage over his opponents.

Do you know how many bulls he would have to have eaten in order to test positive for Clenbuterol; Which is an Anabolic agent used as a performance enhancer?

[Curtis Harper]

demanding absolute proof, for something that is purely hypothetical..... seems silly

especially considering the fact that plenty of P4P fighters lost to opponents who were not ranked P4P

your proof..... is proof of nothing, other than what they did yesterday..... case in point, Pacquiao

demanding by resume, is requiring someone to draw you a roadmap..... like I said, it takes knowledge and understanding, especially when it comes to style

But isn't it claimed Pac has the best resume, whatever that is

[aboutfkntime]

guys, there is no way to spin it..... if "resume doe" is your MAIN determining factor, then this is your P4P list.....


1) Pacquiao
2) *****
3) *****
4) *****
5) *****
6) *****
7) *****
8) *****
9) *****
10) *****
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
* Golovkin


fill in the blanks however you see fit..... it does not matter who else, because nobody will note of a list with Pacquiao ranked #1 and Golovkin missing anyway

[Curtis Harper]

guys, there is no way to spin it..... if "resume doe" is your MAIN determining factor, then this is your P4P list.....


1) Pacquiao
2) *****
3) *****
4) *****
5) *****
6) *****
7) *****
8) *****
9) *****
10) *****
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
* Golovkin


fill in the blanks however you see fit..... it does not matter who else, because nobody will note of a list with Pacquiao ranked #1 and Golovkin missing anyway

Compare that which you

Shouldn't be hard