He took GGG by EASY KTFO. And took Jacobs also. He has Canelo with 5 loses now.
they criticize Jacobs, for not doing enough to win..... but then give Jabkin a free pass for doing exactly the same thing..... Jabkin should have fought Canelo..... like his trainer instructed from the corner, when Abel saw that Canelo was winning
Chavez sr. Had great waist movement and good defense. He didn’t just rush in. He slipped and picked off shots while walking his man down.
So if what your saying is Canelo doesn’t possess power then why do his opponents choose to fight of the back foot. Jacobs never tried cuz he knew if he tried and go toe to toe there was a big possibility of him being dropped or ko’d.
Canelo doesnt go toe to toe either.....He will in the last rd but thats about it. Its not like Jacobs is a master boxer who Canelo couldnt back against the ropes. Like I said... Canelo has zero kos/knockdowns in his biggest fights despite landing clean power shots.
I’ve boxed when I was a teen. So if your implying that you box doesn’t mean you have the intellectual capacity to understand boxing (Most likely your not that good if you haven’t done anything with it yet) That being said Mickey moved up 2 weight classes and yes he lost but in no way got beat up like GGG did agains Nelo in the rematch. Cinnamon beat the Mexican outta him and made him retreat all night. Something he never did in 30+ fights. And Jacobs did come to survive even though he was the one with all the physical advantages. He was worried to stand his ground and exchange. I’m a boxing fan not a Fanboy like you who will never give credit where credit is due. and that’s the main characteristic of a Fanboy and you sir are definitely one.
Dude how can you make a post like this, then at the end say you are impartial and objective lol.
You said Canelo beat GGG worse than Spence beat Mikey.
Spence outlanded Mikey roughly 345 - 75 lol. GGG roughly outlanded Canelo 234-202 in the rematch. Also the whole rematch was more or less in the center of the ring, with both guys circling around. Canelo held the center of the ring MUCH better in the 2nd fight vs what he did in the first, and hardly ran at all. He also slowed GGG down and forced the fight to the center of the ring, which I agree no one has done to him before (besides Ouma early in his career).
But GGG was still overall the one pressing the action, mainly behind his jab, and again the fight was fought in the center of the ring. If you have evidence of where GGG was running can you please post it or note the rounds? I just watched the rematch again yesterday actually and saw no evidence of it? Also no one says Mikey even won one round. Most people say GGG still won the 2nd fight, and again he outlanded Canelo most rounds, and overall.
How can you claim to be impartial and then make those claims lol? You go on in your next few posts as well to tout your impartiality and mock others on here for their bias lol. Absurd dude come on.
GGG was clearly the better man between him and Canelo between the 2 fights. You want to give Canelo a participation trophy just because he is your guy, yet you claim to be the impartial one and everyone else is biased lol. Crazy man.
Dude how can you make a post like this, then at the end say you are impartial and objective lol.
You said Canelo beat GGG worse than Spence beat Mikey.
Spence outlanded Mikey roughly 345 - 75 lol. GGG roughly outlanded Canelo 234-202 in the rematch. Also the whole rematch was more or less in the center of the ring, with both guys circling around. Canelo held the center of the ring MUCH better in the 2nd fight vs what he did in the first, and hardly ran at all. He also slowed GGG down and forced the fight to the center of the ring, which I agree no one has done to him before (besides Ouma early in his career).
But GGG was still overall the one pressing the action, mainly behind his jab, and again the fight was fought in the center of the ring. If you have evidence of where GGG was running can you please post it or note the rounds? I just watched the rematch again yesterday actually and saw no evidence of it? Also no one says Mikey even won one round. Most people say GGG still won the 2nd fight, and again he outlanded Canelo most rounds, and overall.
How can you claim to be impartial and then make those claims lol? You go on in your next few posts as well to tout your impartiality and mock others on here for their bias lol. Absurd dude come on.
GGG was clearly the better man between him and Canelo between the 2 fights. You want to give Canelo a participation trophy just because he is your guy, yet you claim to be the impartial one and everyone else is biased lol. Crazy man.
Lol bringing up compubox stats to prove your point is the first red flag. Also there’s a difference between getting beat soundly which Errol did to Mickey and getting beaten up which Canelo did to GGG. How can you be pressing the action if your the one going backwards while the other guy is coming forward. Also most professional boxers and coaches (people who actually know what to look for in a fight)seen canelo win that 2nd fight. Not media members or fans who’ve never even stepped into a ring themselves. He was pressing the action by going backwards please
Lol bringing up compubox stats to prove your point is the first red flag. Also there’s a difference between getting beat soundly which Errol did to Mickey and getting beaten up which Canelo did to GGG. How can you be pressing the action if your the one going backwards while the other guy is coming forward. Also most professional boxers and coaches (people who actually know what to look for in a fight)seen canelo win that 2nd fight. Not media members or fans who’ve never even stepped into a ring themselves. He was pressing the action by going backwards please
No one is quoting compubox - I'm telling you that GGG landed 3x the amount of punches Mikey did. Canelo landed almost half of what Spence threw. Yet somehow you say Canelo beat up GGG even though he got outlanded by 30 punches, and you say Mikey didn't get beat up when Spence outlanded him by 5x the punches lol. Again no one gave Mikey a round, and most people said GGG won.
You aren't objective at all - by the way, I asked you to cite the rounds/moments where GGG was backing up? Please do, thanks.
just bc Canelo comes 4d doesnt mean he forcing the fight...he is mostly coming 4d in defensive, safe mode. He is not a pressure fighter ala Chavez Sr or Tito....thats why Jacobs never tired. Canelo hit Jacobs, Ggg clean and never came close to knockdown. He hit Cotto clean countless times - same result. His punches r fast and flashy.
False, he lands hard to the body and his rivals are not able to thrown much or be very aggressives
Munguia is a big guy and has power and Smith said that Nelo has more power
No one is quoting compubox - I'm telling you that GGG landed 3x the amount of punches Mikey did. Canelo landed almost half of what Spence threw. Yet somehow you say Canelo beat up GGG even though he got outlanded by 30 punches, and you say Mikey didn't get beat up when Spence outlanded him by 5x the punches lol. Again no one gave Mikey a round, and most people said GGG won.
You aren't objective at all - by the way, I asked you to cite the rounds/moments where GGG was backing up? Please do, thanks.
I’ll say it again. If you have to use compubox to prove your point. That just tells me you don’t process the intelectual capacity to understand what just happened in the fight. You do know compubox is just a guy in a room pressing a button when ever he “thinks” a punch landed. So it really doesn’t translate to what actually happened in the fight. So keep using compubox
I’ll say it again. If you have to use compubox to prove your point. That just tells me you don’t process the intelectual capacity to understand what just happened in the fight. You do know compubox is just a guy in a room pressing a button when ever he “thinks” a punch landed. So it really doesn’t translate to what actually happened in the fight. So keep using compubox
As I said, for the final time, my punch count numbers don't necessarily have anything to do with compubox. Usually compubox tells the basic story; sometimes I think they get it fairly wrong. But Ray Charles could tell Spence was significantly outlanding Mikey, and could also tell that GGG was outlanding Canelo, round in and round out.
I also asked you, for the final time, to cite the rounds and moments where GGG was backing up in the 2nd fight.
But anyway - I'm done here man, you obviously don't debate in good faith so it's a waste of time - best of luck to you, sincerely!
can’t be exciting when your opponent is not willing to exchange or take some risks. It takes 2 to make a fight exciting. It common sense really. Something you don’t seam to possess
Comment