Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez vs. Daniel Jacobs - CompuBox Punch Stats

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kezzer
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2017
    • 3480
    • 116
    • 35
    • 58,969

    #11
    Not sure I believe these stats, I would have to watch again but it didn’t appear like over 40% of Canelo landed.

    Comment

    • M Bison
      Perfect, but you're not
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 15677
      • 600
      • 798
      • 32,424

      #12
      40% accuracy, give me a god damn break! Is there not even any legitimacy to people who are recording the punches, I mean you could easily have them watch the entire fight over a few more times to get accurate results.

      Comment

      • bigdunny1
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2015
        • 14762
        • 382
        • 2
        • 167,136

        #13
        Originally posted by Red Skull
        40% accuracy, give me a god damn break! Is there not even any legitimacy to people who are recording the punches, I mean you could easily have them watch the entire fight over a few more times to get accurate results.
        Now compubox is just lying about every stat? Damn you haters are funny

        Compubox

        Canelo
        Total shots
        188 of 466 (40%)

        Jabs
        68 of 202 (34%)

        Power shots
        120 of 264 (46%)

        Jacobs
        Total shots
        131 of 649 (20%)

        Jabs
        42 of 290 (15%)

        Power shots
        89 of 359 (25%)

        Comment

        • bigdunny1
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2015
          • 14762
          • 382
          • 2
          • 167,136

          #14
          All the GGG fans and Canelo haters staying away from this thread like the plague lmao

          Comment

          • jas
            Voice of Reason
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 22531
            • 936
            • 914
            • 1,059,614

            #15
            People are sheep and not intelligent enough to think for themselves

            Its why they blindly follow stats

            E.g. arguments that canelo won the round because he outlanded jacobs in power shots

            No power shot is the same

            Canelo and jacobs landed 9 each in the 9th round but jacobs landed a huge shot. Even if canelo had landed a few more average shots would you give the round to canelo or jacobs? You dont even know how to answer

            If canelo is p4p 1 then ggg and jacobs should be in your top 5 since the fights were so close..
            But jacobs wont feature that high

            People are fanboys

            If canelo wasnt popular he would have at least 1 loss vs ggg. And he wouldnt be considered by some as p4p

            So if you get to the crux of it, people are holding in canelo in high regard because he has fans

            Its pathetic and indicative of how dumb people are when it comes to boxing

            Comment

            • M Bison
              Perfect, but you're not
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2012
              • 15677
              • 600
              • 798
              • 32,424

              #16
              Originally posted by bigdunny1
              All the GGG fans and Canelo haters staying away from this thread like the plague lmao
              Doesn't look that way to me, I think Compubox must have some blind people tallying the punch total. Shots slapping the arm and impressively missing wild aren't punches that should be counted.

              Comment

              • bigdunny1
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2015
                • 14762
                • 382
                • 2
                • 167,136

                #17
                Originally posted by Red Skull
                Doesn't look that way to me, I think Compubox must have some blind people tallying the punch total. Shots slapping the arm and impressively missing wild aren't punches that should be counted.
                So compubox is just refusing to count punches just for Canelo? lmao

                Comment

                • bigdunny1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2015
                  • 14762
                  • 382
                  • 2
                  • 167,136

                  #18
                  Damn haters really quiet scared to show their face in this thread lol

                  Comment

                  • dmb2live
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Mar 2018
                    • 16
                    • 0
                    • 6
                    • 9,929

                    #19
                    I don’t agree with the compubox stats for rounds 7-11. Watching it live, I thought Jacobs controlled those rounds with the jab. Jacobs threw a lot of “pawing and range finder” jabs, but I thought he landed at a higher percentage than 20%. Jacobs landed quite a few jabs to the body

                    Comment

                    • bigdunny1
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2015
                      • 14762
                      • 382
                      • 2
                      • 167,136

                      #20
                      Originally posted by dmb2live
                      I don’t agree with the compubox stats for rounds 7-11. Watching it live, I thought Jacobs controlled those rounds with the jab. Jacobs threw a lot of “pawing and range finder” jabs, but I thought he landed at a higher percentage than 20%. Jacobs landed quite a few jabs to the body
                      Lmao!!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP