Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Jacobs - Official Scorecards - Photo

[NachoMan]

Actually I wrote boxing for 3 different publications one of which is one of the biggest sports websites on the web. So I easily take you to school. But I be simple to help with your idiocy or maybe your hooked on phonics didnt work as well as you thought. First I didnt tell you how I scored the fight, second re-read my comment and realize the ******ity of your response which actually underlines my point. You felt Canelo was "busier" that's your words not mine. Watching the fight, and punch stats show that that was not the case. Your feeling is not supported by the facts yet it's one of the ways you chose to score the fight. Wasn't punch stats the same argument you guys made for why Canelo defeated Lara, trout, cotto, GGG. Hmmmm, guess punch stats are only used to argue when it supports your "feeling" of a scoring method.

OMG. "I am legitimate because I write for 3 boxing websites!" Hahahaha! So does my little brother. Does that make you a professional journalist or some other kind of authority on boxing? You started with that little bit of chest thumping because you know how weak and ****** your argument was. I don't have to twist anything at all about your comments. They are plain as day, and plain ******. Go back and read them. Better yet, have your other "journalist" friends go back and read your ******-ass drivel. You want to twist it in some desperate way to preserve your dignity and save face, but there is no chance of that. You are a ****** f.uck who doesn't know jack-shi.t about boxing, yet someone even dumber than you is allowing you to publish work on their website. Go ahead and tell us your name and these websites so we can all avoid them (or better yet read them for comic relief). Just because you write something, kid, doesn't mean its worth a damn thing. Your words and your inability to make a coherent, logical, fact-based argument in defense of your drivel is all anyone needs to know about you. #YDKSAB

[Alan Smithee]

It's one thing to debate and another to argue. Canelo won a lackluster decision. The scorecards were pretty accurate. Obviously a few rounds the other way and there would be a whole new discussion. Happens in boxing. There are many who believe that Charlo dominated and easily beat Harrison. I was at that fight and agreed with the decision. IMHO Canelo invites controversy by not pushing the envelope. Can't argue with his success though!

[NoConcoms]

7-5 or 8-4 In favor of Canelo.

Jacobs was simply not effective enough through the 1st 8 rounds.

[aboutfkntime]

Andrade nexx !!

which will make Canelo..... undisputed

it looks like Andrade is about to increase his fanbase by 97,000

and then they will be gone

like with Kovalev

[robbyheartbaby]

115-113 looks good, great job by the judges they got it right, fun fight both talented fighters.

[KnickTillDeaTh]

OMG. "I am legitimate because I write for 3 boxing websites!" Hahahaha! So does my little brother. Does that make you a professional journalist or some other kind of authority on boxing? You started with that little bit of chest thumping because you know how weak and ****** your argument was. I don't have to twist anything at all about your comments. They are plain as day, and plain ******. Go back and read them. Better yet, have your other "journalist" friends go back and read your ******-ass drivel. You want to twist it in some desperate way to preserve your dignity and save face, but there is no chance of that. You are a ****** f.uck who doesn't know jack-shi.t about boxing, yet someone even dumber than you is allowing you to publish work on their website. Go ahead and tell us your name and these websites so we can all avoid them (or better yet read them for comic relief). Just because you write something, kid, doesn't mean its worth a damn thing. Your words and your inability to make a coherent, logical, fact-based argument in defense of your drivel is all anyone needs to know about you. #YDKSAB

Above is a great example of a child who doesn't get his way. Called out on your lack of knowledge, bested by your own argument, which resulted in your complete melt down underscored by an emotional outburst. As I said I could school you, but it was too easy to do it by simply using your own words.

Glen Feldman turned in the only reasonable card, but I still find it generous to Jacobs. I gave Jacobs 2 rounds and one even. Canelo was busier and more effective in every other round.

When your little brother gets syndicated and receives a press badge, give him my congratulations, It's a great feeling.

[NachoMan]

Above is a great example of a child who doesn't get his way. Called out on your lack of knowledge, bested by your own argument, which resulted in your complete melt down underscored by an emotional outburst. As I said I could school you, but it was too easy to do it by simply using your own words.



When your little brother gets syndicated and receives a press badge, give him my congratulations, It's a great feeling.

Forget all of your silliness about a press press. Any clown can get a press pass. Yes, my lil bro gets those too, wow, amazing. Forget all of that though and let's stay on subject. I would like you to once and for all "school me" with your knowledge as you keep threatening to do. I've explained to you the basic scoring criteria because you believe "punches thrown" actually counts for something. You are the idiot here. Defend your statements instead of bouncing around thumping your chest. You know less than zero about this sport.

[aboutfkntime]

Andrade nexx !!

which will make Canelo..... undisputed

it looks like Andrade is about to increase his fanbase by 97,000

and then, they will be gone..... and Andrade will be alone

like Kovalev

wow, whoever wrote that smart post deserves lots of greenK

[mrpain81]

Thought Canelo won the last two rounds, don't know how 2 judges gave those 2 for Jacobs. I also had Jacobs in 10,9,8.

I'll have to re-watch but I don't see any possible way Jacobs won that fight.