Originally posted by OCPancho
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Jacobs Faces $1M Penalty, 3 Pounds Overweight At 2nd Weigh-In
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostI like how everyone says "good for him", "smart move", but if Canelo (or god forbid Floyd) did it they would be seething.
I personally don't care. He's a grown ass man, he knows what he's doing.
Those who called Lemieux a cheater and then next week didn't call Jacobs a cheater for doing exactly the same.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrShakeAndBake View PostUmmm Salido did it, you had no problem with it. chill already and wait
till Danny J Knocks that mfer out!!!
LOL
Jacobs has a contractual stipulation added by the DLH side that requires a second weigh-in and that there be a price paid in the event that either fighter exceeds 170. Jacobs exceeded 170, and paid the price stipulated in the contract. Only cheating would be if Jacobs refused to honor the contract and not pay the agreed price for exceeding 170.
Again, the only break in contract is DLH publicising the results of the second (unofficial) weigh-in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View PostCanelo never broke a contract, never did what Jacobs did two times now
Also abandoned VADA testing when he had to make 154...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View PostLook at this jerk.
GGG was in prime in 2015.
GGG was too old in 2017.
Hahahahaha those bit.ches are the worst sofe loser in boxing history
I mean I know you are a hardcore mexican fighter groupie but please explain to me why isn't it possible?
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostWell Canelo had signed a document stating he would face GGG if they allowed him to make a voluntary defense first against Khan...
Also abandoned VADA testing when he had to make 154...
We are talking about weights in the contract
He did what Floyd said.
He did what Cotto said
Canelo Made a lot of vada testing too lol
Te la vas a pelear pinche narizón enfermo, loco y pendejo. Aún así va a ganar Saúl.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostI been knowing this,but I still love owning him publicly to shut him up & send him for cover. And also to publicly show others the fallacy of his feminine ways.
Comment
-
Originally posted by angkag View PostJust on the hair test:
- Canelo tested positive Feb 17 (and Feb 20) in urine tests
- hair sample taken Mar 29, tested negative
- clen can be detected in urine for weeks, but detected in hair samples for months
So, just applying logic, why didn't the hair test show the clen that was known to be in the system Feb 17 ? Isn't the only proof here that the hair test doesn't work as it fails to pick up the clen that was known to be in the system on Feb 17 ?
And if the argument is that the amounts were so tiny, can we just remind ourselves that there were 105 positive clen tests in the youth soccer tournament, and Canelo's level on Feb 27 was among the top 5 out of those 105 positive tests (ie he came close to top of class).
Comment
Comment