Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jacobs Faces $1M Penalty, 3 Pounds Overweight At 2nd Weigh-In

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by OCPancho View Post
    Where did you get your 840K from ?
    Try 600K.

    Not that it was not a dirty play.
    Marquez mentioned in golpe a golpe that the penalty for missing weight was 350k reduced by Floyd that week from the half a million a pound to 350k, lets not forget he missed 2.5 pounds not 2 pounds.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
      I like how everyone says "good for him", "smart move", but if Canelo (or god forbid Floyd) did it they would be seething.

      I personally don't care. He's a grown ass man, he knows what he's doing.
      You don't have to guess about hypocrisy... we already have examples!

      Those who called Lemieux a cheater and then next week didn't call Jacobs a cheater for doing exactly the same.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Boksfan View Post
        That guy is so racist it's not even funny.
        So are you lol. Oh because you said "so"... My b.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by MrShakeAndBake View Post
          Ummm Salido did it, you had no problem with it. chill already and wait
          till Danny J Knocks that mfer out!!!
          LOL
          Salido case different as he missed the official weigh-in, weighing in 2 and a 1/4 pounds over the featherweight limit. That was a violation of the rules and he got stripped of his belt as a result.

          Jacobs has a contractual stipulation added by the DLH side that requires a second weigh-in and that there be a price paid in the event that either fighter exceeds 170. Jacobs exceeded 170, and paid the price stipulated in the contract. Only cheating would be if Jacobs refused to honor the contract and not pay the agreed price for exceeding 170.

          Again, the only break in contract is DLH publicising the results of the second (unofficial) weigh-in.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
            Canelo never broke a contract, never did what Jacobs did two times now
            Well Canelo had signed a document stating he would face GGG if they allowed him to make a voluntary defense first against Khan...

            Also abandoned VADA testing when he had to make 154...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
              Look at this jerk.

              GGG was in prime in 2015.

              GGG was too old in 2017.

              Hahahahaha those bit.ches are the worst sofe loser in boxing history
              Im far from a GGG fan. But how is it impossible for him to be out of prime 2 years later at his age? Whar age is it ok for you? What is the age to be out of prime for you?

              I mean I know you are a hardcore mexican fighter groupie but please explain to me why isn't it possible?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
                Canelo never broke a contract, never did what Jacobs did two times now

                Actually, Canelo has done exactly the same thing before.


                https://www.boxingscene.com/photos-w...n-point--36620

                Comment


                • Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                  Well Canelo had signed a document stating he would face GGG if they allowed him to make a voluntary defense first against Khan...

                  Also abandoned VADA testing when he had to make 154...
                  That does not mean sh.it

                  We are talking about weights in the contract

                  He did what Floyd said.

                  He did what Cotto said

                  Canelo Made a lot of vada testing too lol


                  Te la vas a pelear pinche narizón enfermo, loco y pendejo. Aún así va a ganar Saúl.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by kushking View Post
                    I been knowing this,but I still love owning him publicly to shut him up & send him for cover. And also to publicly show others the fallacy of his feminine ways.
                    nah, you should take his advice and quit.... Delahoya style. You're out of your league.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by angkag View Post
                      Just on the hair test:

                      - Canelo tested positive Feb 17 (and Feb 20) in urine tests
                      - hair sample taken Mar 29, tested negative
                      - clen can be detected in urine for weeks, but detected in hair samples for months

                      So, just applying logic, why didn't the hair test show the clen that was known to be in the system Feb 17 ? Isn't the only proof here that the hair test doesn't work as it fails to pick up the clen that was known to be in the system on Feb 17 ?

                      And if the argument is that the amounts were so tiny, can we just remind ourselves that there were 105 positive clen tests in the youth soccer tournament, and Canelo's level on Feb 27 was among the top 5 out of those 105 positive tests (ie he came close to top of class).
                      here is logic, you don't know when he took the clen and it's known that hair testing for clen isn't reliable. Everything you see there says "can remain in system" , "may remain in hair" , nothing concrete. That's why it's not the primary form of testing used. Because it's not reliable. Again with logic, don't you find it odd that he tested positive the very first time they ever tested him in Mexico and that was the furthest out from a fight that they had ever tested him? Common sense should tell you something.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP